CE ÎNSEAMNĂ ÎN MUNCĂ O JUMĂTATE DE ŞEKEL – 1

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

What Is Half a Shekel in the Work – 1

Article No. 12, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

The verse says, “When you take a census of the children of Israel to number them, each one of them shall give a ransom for his soul to the Lord, when you number them, and there shall be no plague among them when you count them. This is what they shall give: half a shekel in the shekel of holiness. The rich shall not pay more and the poor shall not pay less than half a shekel, to make atonement for your souls.”

In order to understand this in the work, we must first present what our sages said (Nida 31b), “Our sages said, ‘There are three partners in a person: the Creator, his father, and his mother. His father sows the white; his mother sows the red, and the Creator places in him a spirit and a soul.’” It is known that all of our work is only to achieve Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator, called “equivalence of form,” since we were born with a desire to receive delight and pleasure for self-love. This is the opposite of the Creator, whose wish is to bestow upon His creatures.

It is also known that disparity of form creates separation. When the creatures are separated from the Life of Lives, they are called “dead.” For this reason, there was a correction that is known as Tzimtzum [restriction] and concealment, to such an extent that we must work on faith, to believe in the Creator and in reward and punishment. However, all the concealments are only so as to have the ability to engage in Torah and Mitzvot [commandments] in order to bestow and not for our own sake.

If the delight and pleasure were revealed, and Providence were revealed—that the Creator behaves benevolently with Hiscreatures as good and as doing good, it would be utterly impossible for the creatures to work and observe Torah and Mitzvot in order to bestow. Instead, they would have to work in order to receive, for they would have no way to overcome the pleasures they would feel in Torah and Mitzvot.

But once the concealment has been established, and the delight and pleasure in Torah and Mitzvotare not revealed, in order for the world to exist, so they would have some vitality and feel pleasure in their lives, we were given light and pleasure clothed in corporeal pleasures, as The Zohar says. But we must believe that this is only a very thin light, called “thin light,” which was given to the Klipot[shells/peels] so they can exist and sustain man before he is rewarded with receiving other Kelim[vessels], called “vessels of bestowal,” for only in those Kelim is it possible for the upper light to appear.

Therefore, the beginning of man’s work is to believe above reason concerning everything he sees and feels, that it is only a concealment that was placed deliberately for man’s sake. But the truth is not as he sees and feels, so he should tell himself: “The have eyes and do not see, ears, anddo not hear.”

This means that only through this work, by overcoming the mind and heart, can he be rewarded with vessels of bestowal, for specifically with these Kelim he can see and feel the Creator’s guidance as benevolent.

However, what can one do when he sees that it is not easy to overcome self-love, and to have the ability to come to the degree of bestowal in mind and heart? In that state, when a person begins to feel that there is evil in him, and he wants to exit the evil’s control, but feels that he cannot exit its control and that it is not so easy, but probably requires great exertion to obtain vessels of bestowal, he is willing to exert but does not know in what way he can arrange his way so as to clearly know that this is the right way that will bring him to the King’s palace, meaning to be rewarded with Dvekutwith the Creator, as it is written (Deuteronomy 30), “To love the Lord your God, to hear unto His voice, and to cling unto Him, for He is your life.”

The order is that first he must divide his work into two opposite ways. That is, there is a way where one must walk on a path of wholeness, and although he sees that he is full of flaws, there is still happiness: He is happy that he is not deficient. It is as our sages said, “Who is rich? He who is happy with his lot” (Avot 4:1). This depends on the extent to which he appreciates the importance of the King.

That is, he examines the measure of his desire to cling to the Creator, meaning that it is worthwhile to relinquish himself and annul before Him. This is as it is written in the book Matan Torah (The Giving of the Torah) (p 129), where he presents the following allegory: “The soul is an illumination that extends from His essence. This illumination has parted from the Creator by the Creator clothing it in a desire to receive, for that thought of creation to delight His creatures created in every soul a desire to receive pleasure. Yet, the disparity of form of the will to receive separated that illumination from His essence and made it a separate part from Him.”

When a person believes this, that his soul comes from His essence, but was separated from the Creator and became an authority of its own with creation, meaning through the will to receive installed in her, he gives the following allegory about it: “Now the soul is just like an organ that was cut off and separated from the body. Although prior to the separation, the organ and the rest of the body were one, exchanging thoughts and feelings, after the organ was cut off from the body they became two authorities. Now one does not know the thoughts of the other. This is all the more so once the soul clothed in a body of this world—all the ties it had prior to her separating from His essence have stopped.”

Therefore, when a person sees how important is his engagement in Torah and Mitzvot—that the Creator has given to us to observe His commandments, for by keeping what He has commanded to us we have the privilege of keeping contact with the Creator. And although he still does not feel this privilege, for lack of importance, since we see that in corporeality, when a person enjoys his life, how much time during the day does he enjoy the corporeality? He is limited in receiving pleasure. Instead, he has certain times when he enjoys, such as when he eats and drinks and sleeps and sees nice things or listens to singing and good music. However, he cannot eat, drink, look, and listen all day long. Rather, he settles for what he has and feels wholeness in the corporeal life, and does not say, “If I cannot enjoy all those things today, I give them up.” The reason is the importance of corporeality.

It therefore follows that if a person pays attention to the importance of the King, he will have complete satisfaction in being given the Torah and Mitzvot to observe as much as he can. Even if, for example, he has the privilege of speaking with a great king with whom not anyone is permitted to come and speak. Rather, it requires much persuasion among the king’s confidants to let him speak a few words with the king. How elated that person would be when he sees that many people are not permitted to approach the king, or are even told that the king is here in town and there are people who can speak with the king.

He sees that there are people in the world who do not know that there is a King in the world, and only a very small group of people in the world were given the thought and desire to believe that there is a King in the world. Even those who were informed about the King do not know that it is possible to speak with Him. But that person was given knowledge from above that he can come in and speak with the King, meaning that he can believe.

We can understand this with an allegory. A person who comes to drink water is told, “Go, come in and speak with the King. Tell him, ‘I thank You for letting me drink,’ and say the blessing ‘Blessed are You, O Lord…’” In other words, he thanks and says to Him: “I thank You for ‘everything that is made by His word.’” It follows that if he believes that he is speaking with the King, as it is written, “The whole earth is full of His glory,” what elation a person feels when he believes that he is speaking with the King for only a moment.

The excitement from standing and speaking with the King for even a moment should give complete satisfaction so he will have vitality and joy throughout the day. Although he does not see the King, we were given the belief that “the whole earth is full of His glory,” and we were also given the belief that “You hear the prayer of every mouth.”

Baal HaSulam said about that, “every mouth,” means even the mouth of the lowliest person. The Creator hears everyone! It follows that according to one’s faith when he is speaking with the Creator, meaning whether he thanks Him or asks Him for something, the Creator hears everything. That person, if he walks in this path, can be happy all day long because he feels contentment from speaking to the King.

Especially during the prayer, it does not even matter if he does not know the meaning of the words because his praying and uttering what is written in the prayer book, a person should know that this is the order that the ministers of the King have arranged, that when entering the King’s place, these are the words to be said. Therefore, it makes no difference if he knows what he is saying or not, for it is not man who has made this prayer or this thanksgiving, for this is the order for everyone, as anyone who comes in to speak to the King, they arranged it and not he.

Indeed, what a person asks is not written in the prayers or in the thanksgivings that he says. Rather, the prayers that a person says are written and inscribed in man’s heart. That is, a person asks not what is written in the prayer book, but what is written in his own heart. It therefore follows that although everyone prays with the same prayer book, each one demands and prays that He will satisfy the deficiency in his heart.

It is as it is written in the blessing for the new month: “Life, that the Lord will fulfill our heart’s wishes for the best.” This means that after all the prayers we say in the blessing for the new month, which our sages have set up, we conclude with our own prayer, meaning what the heart prays, and say that the Creator will fulfill our heart’s wishes for the best.

We should understand why we say that the Lord will fulfill our heart’s wishes for the best. Why do we add “our heart’s wishes for the best”? We understand that man’s heart, what he asks and prays for, comes from his heart. But who knows if the heart yearns for good things? The heart could ask for bad things. For this reason, we were given the addition “our heart’s wishes for the best.” Conversely, when our sages established the prayers, their heart was completely with the Creator. Certainly, all their prayers are good prayers. But we are not so, hence we must add “for the best.”

It therefore follows that one should rejoice in having been rewarded with speaking a few words with the King. This is called “right line,” meaning the path of the right, which is called “wholeness.” This means that he does not feel in himself any lack.

By this we can interpret what our sages said, “There are three partners in a person: His father sows the white.” His father is called “male,” meaning complete. But the mother is called “female,” deficient. This is why they said, “His father sows the white,” from the color “white,” meaning that it is spotless there, completely white, without any deficiency.

This is as our sages said (Yotze 16), “Every turn you turn will be only through the right.” This means that the order of the beginning of the work should be in the right, meaning in wholeness, when a person sees no deficiency in himself. Naturally, at that time it is possible to praise the King for giving him wholeness, and then it can be said, “the blessed cling to the Blessed.”

But when a person feels deficient, our sages said “The cursed does not cling to the blessed.” For this reason, in such a state he is separated. Therefore, a man must walk on the right line, called “wholeness,” from which a person receives life, when he is adhered to some extent to the Life of Lives. But a person, as long as he lives, can see whether his deeds are good or bad and correct them.

If a person dies, meaning has no vitality, nothing from which to receive life, he cannot correct his actions because at that time he is considered dead. And with all of his vitality, it is possible that if he could escape the life he is in while in this world, and die a physical death, or at least, if he could take a sleeping pill so he could sleep for at least three months, if he were to see such a sleeping pill and could receive vitality from it, but what can he do if in the meantime he wants nothing but to sleep? And if he must do something, when he remembers that soon he will have time to sleep, from this he receives his vitality for the time being.

For this reason, a person must make the first basis in his work the walk on the right line, the line of wholeness, without any deficiency in mind or heart. Baal HaSulam said about what is written in the Book of Esther, “And Mordechai knew all that was done, and Mordechai tore up his clothes and wore sack and ashes and went out and cried a great and bitter cry, and came up to the king’s gate, for it is forbidden to come into the king wearing sackcloth.”

The Even Ezra interprets there that it is the way of the degrading of the kingship. He said a commentary on this, that when a person engages in Torah and Mitzvot, or when he prays, it is regarded as standing at the King’s gate. At that time, if a person looks at himself and wants to see if he is OK, meaning if he is not transgressing the King’s commandment, through this act the King is degraded, by Him seeing that there are people, of whom he is one, who do not want to recognize the greatness of the King. They do not want to take upon themselves the King’s authority. On the contrary, they have the power to say that they do not recognize the King’s kingship.

Rather, the King’s glory is that everyone recognizes the importance of the King and everyone wants to serve Him with their hearts and souls. It is beautiful to see how they are all standing and praising the King, how He cares about the well-being of all the people in the country. This is the meaning of “It is forbidden to come into the King’s gate wearing sackcloth,” which is a dirty garment.

Rather, when coming into the King’s gate, one should be dressed with clothes that befit sitting at the King’s gate. Otherwise, when he is sitting wearing sackcloth, it is a sign that he is not happy with the King, but is rather sitting and mourning what he is missing in life and has no peace of mind. It follows that he sits and mourns, and he is in contempt of the King for the King not having mercy on him and not satisfying his wish.

Instead, when one engages in Torah and Mitzvot, he should believe above reason that what he has is very important, and that he is unworthy of more, but should be content with little and be happy with his lot, that despite the small amount that He has given him, he has a grip on spirituality, meaning small in quality and small in quantity.

From everything, a person should be happy, meaning with any extent of grip on spirituality that he may have. He believes that he was given this from above, that this, too, is not “my strength and the might of my hand.” Naturally, he can adhere to the Creator to the extent called “the blessed clings to the blessed.”

This is the meaning of what our sages said (Shabbat 30), “The Shechina [Divinity] is present only through the joy of Mitzva [good deed/commandment],” as it was said, “And now, take me a musician, and he was as a playing musician and the hand of the Lord shall be upon him.” Rav Yehuda said, “So it is with words of the law.” That is, Dvekut [adhesion] must be equivalence of form. It follows that when a person feels that he is cursed, there is no place for Dvekut. We should interpret why Rav Yehuda said, “So it is with the words of the law.” It is known that Halacha [law] is called Hakalah [the bride], which pertains to the acceptance of the Kingdom of Heaven. That is, the acceptance of the Kingdom of Heaven, which is above reason, is called “the joy of Mitzva.”

And there is a higher degree, called “the instilling of the Shechina,” and it all comes through joy. Otherwise, it turns out that it is specifically the blessed who cling to the blessed. But if he feels that he is cursed, he cannot cling to the blessed. Naturally, in that state he remains lifeless.

It therefore follows that when we say, “Blessed are You, O Lord, who hears a prayer,” it means that we are thanking the Creator for hearing the prayer. But when a person is deficient, for otherwise he has no room for prayer, he is in a state of “cursed.” Thus, how can he have Dvekut with the Creator during the prayer? Moreover, if he is deficient, what is he thanking Him for?

The answer to this is that by believing that He hears the prayer, we already have joy because He will certainly save us. It follows he already has joy about the prayer, for even when he is confident, he must work above reason that the Creator will help him and he will be able to immediately be rewarded with Dvekut, since the confidence itself gives him wholeness and he is already called “blessed,” and as said above, the blessed cling to the blessed.

However, precisely when a person asks the Creator to bring him closer, the evil inclination comes and lets him understand that the Creator is not hearing his prayer. It does not let him trust in the Creator’s help, and brings him several proofs and says, “Look back and see how many times you have already prayed and thought that the Creator was helping you, only to later remain bare and destitute? This happens to you every time, and each time you say, ‘Now the Creator is certainly hearing me and I’ll be permanently adhered to spirituality.’ You tell me, what happens afterwards? You fell again into the place of lowliness and sank into greater self-love than before you prayed. Therefore, why are you now so sure that now the Creator will hear you that you are already so thankful to the Creator that you say, ‘Blessed are You, O Lord, Who hears a prayer’?”

What can a person reply to the body when it brings him evidence from the past that his prayer was not granted? Based on what does a person want to tell it that this is not so, but that I believe above reason that now I am certain that the Creator will answer my prayer?

The answer is that since the whole foundation is built on above reason, and man must observe this Mitzva, therefore, the evidence from the past that you are bringing me—that my prayer was not granted and this is why there is no reason to trust in the Creator that my prayer will be accepted this time—you bring me evidence from the past in order to weaken my power of faith.

But I am telling you that specifically now I can say that I believe and trust above reason because you bring evidence only from within reason. I thank you very much for the questions you are asking me and for the proofs, for you are giving me a place on which to build the above reason. Therefore, now I am continuing with great joy for the opportunity to observe the Mitzva of faith and confidence above reason.

It therefore follows that from the same place where the body comes to weaken him from the joy that he has from the prayer, and his confidence that the Creator will now answer his prayer, a person needs to bring the power for faith above reason. That is, on the place of reason there is now an opportunity to place the above reason. If the reason did not bring him the opposite, how could he say that he is going above it?

Therefore, a person must always say that each time, he is given descents from above so as to have room to go above reason, so in any case, the body cannot weaken the faith and confidence that he has during the prayer when the body resists his thanking the Creator and saying, “Blessed are You, O Lord, Who hears a prayer.” The body argues, “How do you know that the Creator will answer your prayer that you are thanking Him?”

It cannot be said that he is thankful to the Creator for answering others. He thanks Him for this and says to Him: “Blessed are You,” when a person normally blesses for what he has obtained by himself, and not that he is thankful for others. And in general, how does one know what is in the heart of one’s friend?

Rather, a person thanks the Creator for himself, and also says to the body, “Thank you for coming to me with correct arguments, since now I have room to work above reason.” This is called “right line,” “wholeness,” and this is the main road on which a person must walk. From here a person draws vitality, for then he is on the degree of “blessed.” This is called “The blessed clings to the blessed.”

However, a person cannot walk on one leg, called “right leg,” which is wholeness. He also needs another leg, which is the left leg. “Left” means something that requires correction, where there is a deficiency that needs to be corrected. It is as our sages said (Sotah 47), “Our sages said, ‘The left should always reject, and the right brings closer.’”

We should interpret this according to our way that “right” is when he works in a way of “the right brings closer,” meaning that it brings him closer to Kedusha [sanctity/holiness]. He looks and sees how he is close to spirituality, and with every portion, when he sees that he is close to Kedusha, even if by a tiny grip, he is happy and thanks the Creator for it, and does not look at the negative.

“The left rejects” is when he is walking on the left leg. At that time he is looking only at the rejections, how much he is rejected and removed from Kedusha in both quantity and quality. This means that these two ways are completely opposite to one another, from one end to the other. For this reason, right is called Hesed [mercy], as it is known that the right line is mercy, and it is also called “day,” as it is written, “In the day, the Lord commands His mercy.”

The thing is that one who walks on the “right” looks only at the mercy that the Creator is doing with everyone, and how he himself is receiving mercy from the Creator. He thanks the Creator for all the receptions of mercy, and naturally lives in a day that is all good, for when he feels the mercies that the Creator is doing with him, he rejoices and has something for which to thank the Creator.

However, when he wants to walk on the left leg, too, concerning the “left,” we learned that the left rejects. This means that when he criticizes his actions—if something requires correction—this is the time to see only rejections: how he is repelled from spirituality and all his thoughts, words, and actions are immersed in self-love. He does not see any possibility that he will be able to exit the body’s control, which controls him with all its might.

Moreover, as soon as he begins to think that it is not worthwhile to remain in a state of reception, the body promptly comes to him with stronger arguments than the body usually said when he did not want to obey it but wanted to work in order to bestow, since now the body has become shrewder and asks more poignant questions.

He asks himself: “How come before I started to work harder and with greater effort in the holy work the body was not that clever, and now that I have begun to do the holy work I understood that the good side of a person should be smarter and more clever, and more energetic because I have engaged in holy work?”

According to the rule, “A Mitzva [good deed/commandment] induces a Mitzva,” I understood that the body grows weaker. That is, the arguments it had thus far ceased and it had no strength to argue because the Kedusha was strengthened by the good deeds that I was doing all the time in holy work. But now I see the opposite: The body has become smarter and presents stronger and more sensible arguments.

But what despairs him most is that it says it would be better for him to stop this work called “working in order to bestow,” and be like the rest of the people, without looking to be extraordinary, meaning to return to the normal state. That is, it is enough for us to observe Torah and Mitzvot without intentions, and we need to give all our energy to observing Torah and Mitzvot more meticulously, since this is easier than the aim to bestow.

Especially, I see that compared to those who want to be extraordinary, ordinary people engage more meticulously with Torah and Mitzvot than other people, and this awards them titles. One is called “righteous,” another is called Hassid [pious], and another is called “A very important person.” So why should he walk into the path of for the Creator instead of for his own benefit?

In that state, a person needs great mercy in order not to escape the campaign. One has no way out of this situation unless through faith above reason, and to say that the body has now become very clever because it is given from above a sensation of what is reason so it will now be possible for him to go above reason.

“Reason” means reason that comes from an external mind. Externality is the original will to receive, in which there is no bestowal. The “inner reason” is reason that dresses in the inner Kelim [vessels], which is Bina, whose origin is bestowal and who has no reception in her whatsoever. For this reason, the external mind does not understand that there is a reality of a desire to bestow. Hence, when a person awakens to do something in order to bestow, it immediately stands against him like an experienced warrior and begins to subdue a person with great craftiness.

Do not be surprised, since the verse says that the evil inclination is called an “old and foolish king.” So why do we say that it is clever? We should ask a different question about this: “How can it be said that an angel, who is spiritual, is a fool, as it is written in The Zohar about the verse, ‘For He will command His angels to you to guard you in all your ways’?” It interprets “His angels” to mean two angels: the good inclination and the evil inclination. If the evil inclination is called an “angel,” how can it be a fool? We must interpret that an angel is named after the action, as it is written (Judges 13), “And the angel of the Lord said unto him, ‘Why do you ask for my name, for it is wondrous?’”

This means that the name of the angel changes according to the mission it was sent to do. It follows that the action determines its name.

Accordingly, we should say that the evil inclination is called a “fool” because it tries to make man do foolish things, and they make people fools with great cleverness. Therefore, when a person begins to overcome and does not want to listen to it, it must show the person more cleverly that it is right. And when a person overcomes the arguments of the evil inclination, the evil inclination must come to him with even cleverer arguments, so that one cannot defeat it unless through faith above reason and to say that reason is meaningless and that he is going above reason.

However, if a person overcomes the external reason, which is making just arguments, he gains that each time, his faith grows to a higher degree than what he had prior to the coming of the evil inclination with its reasoning that it is not worthwhile to exit self-love. Because the reason of the evil inclination grows each time, one has no other choice—if he wants to remain in Kedusha—but to draw upon himself greater faith. That is, each time he becomes more needy of the Creator to help him be saved from his evil. This means that one should not pray that the foreign thoughts will die but that they will repent.

This is done specifically by receiving help from above in the form of faith above reason. It follows that he is not asking the Creator that the thoughts will die so he will not have to overcome the thoughts, but rather to settle for the faith he has in the Creator, that to the extent of the faith he has before the evil inclination came with its correct arguments, and which could not be answered without the help of the Creator, he receives the strength to go above reason.

But one who is not walking on the path of truth, whose work is based entirely on a foundation of mind and heart, asks the Creator to take these thoughts away from him so they will not disrupt his work. It follows that he remains in his degree and cannot advance, since he has no need to advance. Instead, he wants to remain in the current state permanently, this is all he expects, and he has no need for greatness.

Although he wants higher degrees than the rest of the people, meaning, if he is a wise disciple and knows that there are people who are not nearly at his level, and of course he wants to be at the top in the work, for this reason he wants to rise to a higher level than where he feels he is right now. However, this is all in excess; it is not necessity. One who prays for surplus, his prayer cannot be from the bottom of the heart because he knows that his situation is not so bad. He sees that there are people who are worse than he, and he needs it only as a surplus.

The rule is that “There is no light without a Kli [vessel],” and a Kli means a lack and a need that he must satisfy. Surplus, however, is not regarded as a lack in spirituality, and for this reason a person stays where he is and cannot move at all.

However, it is not so for one who wishes to walk on the path of truth, who wants to work in mind and heart. When the body comes to him and begins to attack him over why he wants to veer off from the common way, that everyone works in order to receive, and after each time he overcomes it, it comes to him with stronger arguments, in that state he does not ask the Creator to take away its arguments, but rather asks the Creator to repent on all those arguments that the wicked one is presenting, meaning that the Creator will give him the strength to go above reason.

It follows that his asking the Creator to give him more strength is not because of surplus, but simply that he wants to be a Jew who believes in the Creator, and it brings him thoughts that slander the path of the Creator and everything related to Kedusha. That is, whenever he wants to do something in order to bestow, it immediately comes to him with the arguments of the wicked, who mock the servants of the Creator, as it is written, “Not to us, O Lord, not to us, but to Your name give glory, for why should the nations say…”

Therefore, the reason that each time he wants greater powers from above is necessity: He is asking for help to be saved from death, to enter life, for “The wicked in their lives are called ‘dead.’” And since it wants to put him in the camp of the wicked with its arguments, it follows that he is not asking the Creator’s help so He will give him luxuries, but simply for his soul, so he will not be wicked.

It therefore follows that a person always benefits from the questions of the wicked by giving him a need to ask the Creator to grant his heart’s wishes favorably, meaning to be good and not bad. Such a prayer is called a “prayer from the bottom of the heart.” It is received above immediately since it is regarded as a “prayer of the poor,” as it is written in The Zohar about the verse, “A prayer for the poor when he is weak,” where it says that the prayer of the poor delays all the prayers since its prayer is received before all other prayers.

The reason is that to him, this is not luxury, but he simply wants to live and not be as one who is dead, for the wicked in their lives are called “dead.” This is the meaning of what is written, “The Lord is near to all who call upon Him in truth.”

We should interpret that the Lord is near to save those who seek, who want to walk on the path of truth called “for the sake of the Creator.”

That is, they see that they cannot overcome self-love and work in order to bestow, and ask the Creator to help them overcome the body. That is, they ask the Creator for only one thing—to be able to do something for the Creator, to be able to say wholeheartedly, “Blessed is our God, who has created us for His glory,” and not for the sake of the body.

Now we can understand what our sages said, “There are three partners in a person: the Creator, his father, and his mother. His father gives the white.”

“White” is called the “right line,” which is regarded as white, meaning that there is no stain or flaw there, but only wholeness. However, as said above, the wholeness is from the perspective of importance. That is, he sees that he has faults, but how does he know that he has faults? It comes from his mother, who is called “left line,” meaning that she is in the form of “the left rejects,” which is regarded as Nukva [female], a deficiency.

When he examines his spiritual state, he sees that he does not have all the desirable intentions, meaning that they will all be in order to bestow. Rather, he sees how he is immersed in self-love. Moreover, he sees that it is impossible for a person to come out of this control, but only the Creator can deliver him from exile, as it was in the redemption from Egypt. It is written about it, “I the Lord,” and our sages explained, “I and not a messenger.” That is, only the Creator can deliver the enslavement of self-love, called “the land of Egypt,” for Eretz [land] comes from the [Hebrew] word Ratzon [desire]. In other words, the will to receive wants only to restrain the Kedusha, and this is called “the land of Egypt.”

For this reason, once he has started with the right line, which is wholeness, and he should certainly thank and praise the King for giving him wholeness in the importance, as it is written, “Therefore, we must thank You and praise and be grateful to Your name. Happy are we; how fortunate we are. We are happy when we rise and in the evening in synagogues and in seminaries” (prior to reading the “Shema of Offerings”).

Afterward, we move to the left line, called “deficiency.” Meaning, it is called “mother,” female, who indicates lacks, meaning the real measure of his rejection from the desire to bestow. That is, he sees how each time he wants to place the intention to bestow on the act, the body repels him and he cannot overcome it.

In that state, there is room for prayer to the Creator to help him overcome. Subsequently, he returns to the right line and says that he has wholeness and a great privilege, at least with regard to actions. Although the service he is doing for the King is out of an intention for self-love, called Lo Lishma [not for Her sake], this service is still very important to him because whatever the case may be, he is serving the King in his actions.

And since the King is important to him, he can be happy with the small grip that he has on Kedusha. It follows that through the left line, he now receives a way to overcome in the right, and say that he is happy that he can appreciate the little grip he has on Kedusha. That is, before he came to the left line, he thought that he really did have wholeness, but it was incomplete wholeness. Therefore, naturally, I have something for which to praise the King. But now that the left line has let him see that he is remote from wholeness, it follows that now he should be sad and not happy. Still, he braces himself and says, “Since the King is very important, therefore, although I have only a small grip on spirituality, it is still important to me.”

It therefore follows that the left line always causes him to observe the greatness and importance of the Creator, or he will have nothing with which to praise the King, for there is nothing more important in spirituality than to have something for which to be thankful. Hence, the right line causes the left line to grow bigger in him each time, and the left line forces the right line to grow, and by this, the lines grow. When they come to a certain measure that it is clear that these two lines are opposite from one another, the Creator gives the soul, and then he comes out from the exile. This is called “He who comes to purify is aided,” as in the words of The Zohar, that he is given a soul, and this is the help he receives from the Creator.

Now we will explain what we asked about the half shekel and what it implies to us in the work. We should interpret “When you count the heads.” When one wants to be a head in Kedusha and not a tail, it is as we say on the eve of the new year [Rosh Hashanah], “May we be the head and not the tail.” A tail means that he himself has no opinion, but he follows the majority without any criticism over what he does, meaning that he wants to be independent and understand for himself the purpose of his actions. Certainly, after the work, we receive reward. But what reward does he expect in return for his work? Is it true what he has heard from his tutors, who explained to him that it is better to relinquish rest—both bodily rest and the rest of the intellect—and engage in Torah and Mitzvot, for by this he will receive reward? Why is this a reward? They gave him many examples of reward, that it is certainly worthwhile to make an effort in order to be rewarded with this reward. Or, there is a higher and more sublime reward. They showed him examples of reward only suitable to his being a beginner in the work. If he were shown a higher reward than the one they said to him, he would not understand the benefit of the reward due to the smallness of his mind. Therefore, now he must scrutinize and see if this is really the reward that he had heard from them, or should he go and ask what is really the reward he should receive in return for his work?

Moreover, now he wants to know what is really the exertion that he needs to make, and what is this matter of exertion, meaning if observing Torah and Mitzvot in practice is enough in and of itself or is an intention required, too. That is, do I also need to know why I am doing the act, and not because I am doing these actions because I see that there are others who are doing, and they are the leaders of the people so I want to do as they do. Rather, I want to know if it is possible to know the aim of Torah and Mitzvot, or is there no one in the world who has a clue what are Torah and Mitzvot, more understanding, more feeling than little children when they assume the burden of Torah and Mitzvot. That is, although the children grow up, become famous in the greatness of the Torah, this is only with respect to the revealed Torah. That is, they have more knowledge of how and in what way the revealed actions should be done. But in the actual greatness of Torah and Mitzvot they add nothing.

This means that all the greatness is only in the externality of the Torah and Mitzvot, but to have something internal, no one in the world has a clue.

Or, perhaps there are people for whom the internality that is in the Torah and Mitzvot was added. He wants to know its interior, meaning what special intention there is in each and every Mitzva[commandment]. He heard or saw what is written in The Zohar (presented in the Sulam commentary, Part 1), which says that the Mitzvot in the Torah are called in The Zohar by the name “613 deposits,” and they are also called “613 counsels.” The difference between them is that in everything there is anterior and posterior. A preparation for something is called “posterior,” and attainment of the matter is called “anterior.”

Likewise, in Torah and Mitzvot there is “we will do” and “we will hear,” as our sages wrote (Shabbat88), “Doers of His word, to listen to the voice of His words. In the beginning, they do, and afterwards, they hear. The Mitzvot are called by the name ‘613 counsels,’ and they are the posterior. When one is rewarded with hearing the voice of His word, the 613 Mitzvot become deposits, from the word ‘deposit.’ This is so because there are 613 Mitzvot, and in each Mitzva the light of a special degree is deposited, corresponding to a unique organ in the 613 organs and tendons of the soul and the body.”

By this we can interpret “When you count the heads of the children of Israel.” That is, when you awaken to be the head and not the tail, as was written above, the children of Israel, when he wants to understand what is Yashar-El [straight to the Creator] by their numbers, meaning the Mitzvot as deposits. It is written about it, “Each of them shall give a ransom for his soul when you count them.” Counting means calculating, counting how much he knows about the intention of Torah and Mitzvot, and the measure of his nearing the Creator by observing Torah and Mitzvot. At that time he can fall into despair and escape from the war. This is called a “flaw.” To correct this, the children of Israel were blessed first, and then Israel are blessed once more in the end, and there was no flaw in them. It is as it is written (Ki Tissa, Item 2), “Come and see; they established that there is no blessing above for something that is counted. It follows that in the beginning, Israel are blessed when receiving the ransom. Afterward, Israel are blessed again.”

(And in Item 3) It asks, “Why is a plague [also “flaw”] appearing because of the count?” It replies, “It is because there is no blessing in what is counted. And since the blessing disappears, the Sitra Achrais on it.” We should understand why there is no blessing on something that is counted. According to what we explained above, that the blessed cling to the blessed, for this reason, when a person begins to enter the left line, to examine if he already understands everything with his reason, meaning if he already feels that he is progressing in the work, and if he really has faith and confidence that the Creator will help him be rewarded with spirituality and will not remain in his lowliness, during the criticism, opposite thoughts and calculations come to him, from what he would like to see. That is, when he begins to contemplate if the effort he has made in order to be rewarded with some spirituality is worthwhile, and if he is walking on the path of truth, then he can see the truth better than the rest of the people. He sees his real situation, that he is actually far from Kedusha, and he begins to doubt the beginning. That is, he has exerted in vain because now he sees according to his reason that it is a shame to waste time for nothing.

In other words, before he began to walk on the path of truth, he had better thoughts about spirituality. He was not so materialistic, meaning he did not find such good tastes in corporeal things. But now that he has begun the work of bestowal, he has received more lust for corporeal lusts because he finds more pleasure in them.

It follows that according to this calculation, he doubts the beginning. That is, now he has greater regret for his current work, called “bestowal,” that he has left the previous work. He was satisfied with actions and felt utterly complete because he knew that the act was the most important, and there is no need to reflect on the intention. He also had assistance from our sages, who said, “It is not the learning that is the most important, but the act,” and in actions, he was complete. Naturally, he did everything gladly because he felt that he was a complete person. Should the Creator punish him, he understands that perhaps he deserves the punishment because he did not put a lot of efforts into the commandment, “Reprove your neighbor,” as our sages said, “Anyone who can protest and does not protest is punished for it” (Shabbat 54). It is only in this that he feels that he has been lazy with this Mitzva.

This is what he always thought. But now that he has begun to work on the way of in order to bestow, he sees the evil that exists in him more than ever. Therefore, why should he continue in this way. For this reason, now he is in a state of “cursed,” and “The cursed does not cling to the blessed.” It follows that now he is regarded as dead because he has parted from the Life of Lives, and this is regarded as death, called “plague.”

By this we can interpret the reason why there is no blessing in something that is counted, and “since the blessing disappears, the Sitra Achra is on it” and it can harm. Something that counted is regarded as a person beginning to count the gains he has made in spirituality. At that time he sees the opposite; he feels that he has only lost. The Sitra Achra always brings him proof that it is better for him to escape the campaign and he regrets every day that he has exerted in vain, for this path is not for him. It therefore follows that the person cannot do anything in the right way. It follows that on the left line, called “counting,” there is danger of death.

If one can be in one line, meaning walking on the path he walked on before he chose to work in order to bestow, when he knew that only actions were required, and not intentions, for a person is not demanded from above to work with intentions, unless he can observe the Mitzvot, this is really wholeness for him and he need not think about intentions. However, from this he will never reach the truth, for the truth is that every act should be for the sake of the Creator.

It is likewise, in a state of counting, when he is going to calculate if he has gained from the exertion he has put thus far into the work of the Creator, and wants to see the truth. There is great danger here because when he sees that he is not progressing in the work, he might regress from the work and come to a state called “pondering the beginning.”

For this reason, The Zohar says that there was a correction there “that they did not count before all of that ransom was collected and counted. It follows that first, Israel are blessed when receiving the ransom, and then Israel are blessed again. It follows that Israel were blessed in the beginning and in the end, and there was no plague in them.”

By what is said in the words of The Zohar, we can understand the advice that we can give when wanting to walk on the path toward being rewarded with Dvekut with the Creator. According to the rule that there is no light without a Kli because there is no filling without a lack, and a lack means a need, and the need must be from the bottom of the heart, to feel what he needs as necessity and not as luxury, when a person feels a lack, he is in a state of “cursed,” and the cursed does not cling to the blessed. In a state of blessed, a person feels that he has wholeness and no lacks at all. Otherwise, he is not regarded as whole. But if he is in wholeness and has no lack, then he has no need—called a Kli—for the Creator to satisfy.

To this comes the answer that Israel were blessed before the count and after the count, and for this reason there could not be a plague in Israel. The thing is that blessing means that the order of man’s admission to the work begins with the right. That is, he should appreciate the service he is giving to the Creator by observing the commandments of the Creator. To the extent that he appreciates the greatness of the Creator, he rejoices in being rewarded with doing what the Creator commanded.

This matter of appreciating the great one is in our nature. We see that it is regarded as a great honor, if there is someone who is the greatest in the generation and people regard him as an important person. Everyone wants to serve him.

However, the satisfaction in the service depends on the greatness and importance that the world attributes to this great person. It follows that when one feels and depicts to himself that he is serving the Creator, he feels that he is blessed, and then comes the rule that the blessed clings to the blessed.

It follows that in such a state a person feels himself as the happiest in the world. This is the time when he needs to thank the Creator for giving him the little service that he served Him. It follows that in that state he is adhered to the Creator because there is joy in him, as our sages said, “The Shechina [Divinity] is present only out of joy.” Yet, at the same time, he still does not have a Kli so as to have a need for the Creator to truly bring him closer, meaning that his intention will be only to bestow, called Lishma [for Her sake]. And in order to achieve Lishma, a person must have a desire and need. But on the right line, where he feels wholeness, there is no place for a lack.

Therefore, he must switch to the left line, regarded as counting and calculating, to see with his own mind if he really wants to be a servant of the Creator and not serving himself. That is, in everything he does, he has no other thought but his own benefit. At that time, he sees the truth, meaning the left rejects. He sees that he is unable to do anything for the Creator.

To the extent that he felt wholeness in the right and felt good about himself, delighted that he was serving the Creator, to that extent he feels bad about himself when he sees that he is in a state of remoteness from the work of the Creator. That is, now everything is black, to the point where he has no hope of emerging from this control. At that time he can pray, and then he is in a state called “cursed,” “dead,” “wicked,” for he sees that he cannot work for the sake of the Creator.

In order not to have a flaw, since regarding something that is counted, there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and does not sin, he always finds flaws. He must shift to the right line, and then he needs additional overcoming in greatness of the Creator so as to be able to say that he is happy that he has some grip on the work of the Creator, since it is a very important thing to serve the King. For this reason, although it is a tiny grip, still, with respect to importance, I regarded it as a great thing. The fact that the grip on Kedusha has now become smaller is because of the left line, for he saw that he was in utter lowliness. Hence, now it is difficult for him to say the opposite—that he has wholeness. But the truth is that when he says he has wholeness, it is only because of the importance of the greatness of the King, according to the rule that when something is of very high quality, even a small amount of the great quality is more important than a great amount of the low quality.

It therefore turns out that each time, he must increase the right by way of above reason, and always say that as much as he assumes the greatness and importance of the Creator, and that it is worthwhile to be thankful for a small amount, he should glorify and praise the King even more for letting him serve Him just a little. It is as it is written (in The Soul of Every Living Being), “We do not thank You enough, the Lord our God.”

It turns out that by returning to the right line, where there is work in wholeness, called “blessed,” and then returning once again to counting and calculating, and then above reason once again, where there is no place for intellectual calculations, this is called “blessing before the count, and blessing after the count.” This is the correction that there will be no flaw in them, that he will not remain in lowliness and will despair and escape the campaign forever.

This is the meaning of “half a shekel in the shekel of holiness.” It means that the work of holiness, to weigh the work, to give half the work called “right,” which is blessed, as ransom to the Creator, saying that now he is working entirely for the Creator and he has no lack in him, so naturally, I can praise and thank the Creator, and I feel that I am blessed, clinging to the blessed, this is the ransom that he will not remain in the lowliness of the left, called “cursed” and is regarded as separation from the Creator.

The other half of the work is in the left. This is as The Zohar says, that there must be a blessing prior to the counting. This means that before a person walks on the left line, called “counting,” he must be in a state of “right,” called “blessed.” Afterward it is repeated, and naturally there will be no flaw when they count them, meaning when he wants to be rewarded with the Mitzvot being for him as 613 deposits. This is the meaning of what is written, “The rich shall not pay more and the poor shall not pay less than the half shekel.”

“Rich” means “right”—one who is walking on the path of wholeness without lacking anything. Rather, he is delighted with whatever he has. This is why it is said, “The rich shall not pay more than half a shekel.” That is, that he will not walk on the right all the time, but should also shift to the left, called “counting” and “calculating.”

“The poor shall not pay less.” “Poor” means that he has nothing, for when he begins to count and calculate his work, whether it is for the sake of the Creator or for his own sake, he sees that he has nothing with which to say that he is doing this for the sake of the Creator. This is why it is said that the poor shall not pay much less than half. That is, he must shift to the right, which is blessing and wholeness. However, the work should be balanced. These two lines should be equal so that each of them will increase the other.

This is the meaning of what is written, “to atone for your souls.” Specifically by those two, which are opposite to one another, atonement comes, the soul comes out of the control of the exile, where the nations of the world control Israel with the power of self-love. By this they will be rewarded with a head of Kedusha, and will not be as a tail.

This is the meaning of what is written, “There are three partners in a person … His father sows the white.” That is, from the right side, called “his father,” “male,” and male is regarded as wholeness, and wholeness is regarded as white, without any dirt. The mother is called Nukva [female]. She sows the red. Here we see a place of danger that we must correct.

Afterward, the Creator gives the soul, since out of the two above lines emerges a Kli suitable to receive the flow of abundance. At that time we can say that it is regarded as “He who comes to purify.” This comes after he walks on the two above-mentioned two lines, and then “He is aided with a holy soul.”

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

PURIM, ŞI PORUNCA – PÂNĂ CÂND EL NU ŞTIE

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

Purim, and the Commandment: Until He Does Not Know

Article No. 11, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

Our sages said (Megillah 7), “On Purim, one must drink until he does not know the cursed Haman from the blessed Mordechai.” However, it is impossible to come to a state of not knowing before one is in a state of knowing. Afterward, it is possible to say that we should achieve a higher degree, called “not knowing.” Certainly, this is a higher degree than knowing, since we are instructed to observe this only on Purim and not all year long, as our sages said, “On Purim, one must,” and not throughout the year.

Accordingly, we should understand the meaning of knowing and not knowing. We should also understand the commandment in the Torah to read the portion, Zachor [Remember]. The Magen Avraham wrote (Orach Chaim, Mark 685), “I should explain the custom, for because of whom is it written in the Torah that they should read specifically on this Shabbat [Saturday]? The sages determined that it is this Shabbat because many people come to the synagogue. And it is close to Purim in order to attach the story of Amalek with the story of Haman.”

This means that “Remember that which Amalek had done to you” always applies. However, they determined that it should be read on Shabbat before Purim in order to attach the story about Amalek to the story of Haman. Also, what does the attachment of “Remember” to Purim teach us in the work?

In order to understand all the above, we should first understand the purpose of creation. From this we will know what is “between the cursed Haman and the blessed Mordechai,” and what is “cannot tell between the cursed Haman and the blessed Mordechai.”

It is known that the purpose of creation is to do good to His creations. In order for the good that the Creator gives to be complete, that upon reception they will not feel any unpleasantness, since there is a rule that every branch wants to resemble its root, and the root of the creatures is His desire to give to the creatures, when the creatures receive from Him, they feel shame, as it is opposite from the root.

For this reason, there was a correction called “restriction and concealment” on the original vessel of reception, which is—as it was initially created—receiving in order to receive. It was done by correction, meaning that in this Kli [vessel], there is already control over her through the establishing of the restriction so the upper abundance does not come to the Kli called “will to receive.” The Kelim[vessels] of this kind remained in a state called “vacant space without light,” and she remained in the dark.

Only when they can place an intention to bestow on this Kli, which is called “receiving,” meaning although he has a great desire and craving to receive the abundance, still, if he is not sure if what he receives from the Creator will be due to Mitzva [good deed], which is because the Creator wants to give, as it was said, He wants to do good to His creations, he is willing to relinquish the delight that he receives from the Creator. Instead, he wants to receive delight and pleasure only because of the purpose of creation.

Now we can know the difference between the cursed Haman and the blessed Mordechai. The way of Righteous Mordechai is to work only in order to bestow upon the Creator, which is called “bestowing.” By this we can later come to the degree of wholeness, when he comes to a degree where he can already say to the Creator, “I want You to give me delight and pleasure because I want to observe Your desire: to give to the creatures delight and pleasure. Now I am ready to receive the delight and pleasure because I know that I do not want this due to self-love, but in order to bestow.”

Now, with the aim to bestow, reception of the King’s gift is in wholeness. That is, there is no shame there because the reception is because of his desire to assist the Creator, for the purpose of creation to be revealed, so everyone will know that the purpose of creation is to do good to His creations.

Since our sages said (Kiddushin 40b), “If he performs one Mitzva [good deed/correction], happy is he, for he has sentenced himself and the entire world to the side of merit.” Therefore, since he is in a state where he has no concern for self-love but rather for love of others, it follows that by wanting to receive delight and pleasure from the Creator, he wants to keep the love of others between man and God, and between man and man.

This is as it is written in The Zohar (“Introduction of the Book of Zohar,” Item 67): “‘And to say to Zion, ‘You are My people.’’ …Do not pronounce ‘You are My people [ Ami]’ with a Patach in the Ayin, but “You are with Me [ Imi],” with a Hirik in the Ayin, which means partnering with Me. …Happy are they who exert in the Torah.”

Although there it speaks of between man and the Creator, but the matter of interpretation of a partner can also be applied between man and man, since this implies that later, the whole world will receive the side of merit. It follows that he did good between man and man by causing the entire world to receive the delight and pleasure that exist in the purpose of creation.

It follows that he has become a partner of the Creator in that through him will come the assistance by which everyone will achieve the purpose of creation. Thus, he has become a partner of the Creator, as it is written, “I started creation by wanting to give delight and pleasure, and Israel exert to realize the goal by making Kelim [vessels] that are fit to receive the upper abundance without any flaw, called ‘bread of shame.’ Rather, even when they receive the delight and pleasure, they will not lose the Dvekut [adhesion], called ‘equivalence of form,’ for this was the reason for the Tzimtzum[restriction].”

This is regarded as knowing the path of Mordechai, which is a path that brings blessing to the entire world, as it was said above, “If he merits, he sentences himself and the entire world to the side of merit.” This is called “the blessed Mordechai.”

Conversely, Haman’s way is not to look at the correction of the Tzimtzum that was placed on the vessels of reception. Rather, he says, “Since the Creator created the world in order to do good to His creations, and we see that in our nature there is a desire to receive delight and pleasure, then why did the Creator create this desire if not to use it? Did He instead create in us a desire and craving to receive pleasure and said not to use it but be tormented by it?”

It therefore follows that this is the opposite way. It is said that He created the world in order to do good to His creations. By Righteous Mordechai saying not to use this desire, it means that He has created the world in order to do bad to His creations. So, it would probably be better not to create the will to receive delight and pleasure altogether then to create a desire and craving to receive delight, and then say not to use it but to torment oneself and remain devoid of pleasure.

Therefore, how is it possible to agree with Mordechai’s way and say that it is forbidden to use the Kelim that want to enjoy? After all, this is the real Kli [vessel] that the Creator created. Even Mordechai admits that the Creator created the desire to receive delight and pleasure in the world. Therefore, Haman argues that Mordechai’s way is not the path of truth.

Especially, he has many supporters for his way. The whole world says that the real way in the world is as Haman says. It is as it is written (Esther 3): “All the king’s servants, who are at the king’s gate, kneel and bow to Haman, for so the king commanded for him.”

This means that Haman made them see that thus the king commanded. That is, Haman claimed that since the king, meaning the Creator, created the will to receive, He must want us to receive and enjoy. And all the king’s servants kneeled, meaning surrendered to Haman’s view because he argued that this will to receive—which Mordechai says not to use—is incorrect because the Creator did not create it in vain, but rather to be used. And Mordechai says “No,” as it is written, “And Mordechai did not kneel and did not bow.” This is the meaning of what is written, “And the king’s servants, who are at the king’s gate, said to Mordechai: ‘Why are you defying the king’s commandment?’”

Baal HaSulam said about this that it means that the king’s servants said to Mordechai: “Haman is telling us that his going in his way and not in Mordechai’s way is because this is the path of truth.” This is the meaning of their asking Mordechai, “Why are you defying the king’s commandment?” meaning the Creator, for Haman said that so the king had commanded him, meaning the King of Kings.

This means that since the will to receive and to crave for self-love is the King of all Kings, He has created this force in the creatures. This is why the whole world supports Haman’s view and mind.

Also, Haman’s view was written in the Torah, as our sages said (Hulin 139b), “Haman (manna) [in Hebrew: “from” is spelled the same as Haman] from the Torah, where is it from? Have you eaten off the tree from which I have commanded you not to eat?”

Eating from the tree of knowledge is explained in the introduction to the book Panim Meirot. It explains there (Item 18) that Adam HaRishon was completely separated from the Sitra Achra, “And it has already been explained that Adam HaRishon did not have the Gadlut of reception in his structure whatsoever, which extends from the vacant space. Rather, he extended entirely from the system of Kedusha [sanctity], which is about bestowal.” It is written in The Zohar (Kedoshim) that “Adam HaRishon did not have anything from this world. This is why the tree of knowledge was forbidden for him, like his root and the entire system of Kedusha, which are separated from the Sitra Achra due to their disparity of form.” It follows that Haman means using the big will to receive in order to receive, for this was the whole of the serpent’s advice.

It is also written there that he said to the serpent, “God had eaten from this tree and created the world. That is, He looked at this in the form of ‘The end of the act is in the preliminary thought,’ and this is why He created the world.” This is the meaning of the serpent’s argument that eating from the tree of knowledge is God’s commandment.

So why did the Creator command Adam HaRishon not to eat? To this, the serpent gave Adam and Eve a good answer. Essentially, he means to observe the Creator’s commandment by advising them to eat from the tree of knowledge. This is also the issue here in the Book of Esther, where it is written, “And all the king’s servants who are at the king’s gate kneel and bow to Haman.” It is so because so the king had commanded him.

By this we will understand that “cursed Haman” means that Haman’s way is a cursed path, meaning a path of a curse. This is as it is written (Genesis 3), “And the Lord God said unto the serpent: ‘Because you did this, cursed are you more than all beasts.’ …To the woman He said, ‘I will greatly multiply Your sadness.’ …And to the man He said, ‘Because you have … eaten from the tree … Cursed is the earth because of you.’”

According to the above, we understand that the man should reach the degree of “knowing.” Meaning, what is the big difference between “cursed Haman” and “blessed Mordechai”? It is the difference between life and death, since Mordechai’s way brings life, and one is rewarded with adhering to the Life of Lives, but Haman’s way, he already knows, brings curse to the world, for all the death in the world is caused by “Have you eaten off the tree from which I have commanded you not to eat?”

It is about this that the writing says “cursed.” This matter applies until the end of correction, that one should be careful not to fall into the path of Haman. At the end of correction, all the will to receive will be corrected in order to bestow, and then death will be swallowed up forever. It is as The Zoharsays, “At the end of correction, SAM will be a holy angel.”

Now we can understand the attachment of blotting out Amalek when we read, “Remember what Amalek had done to you.” Specifically, when we know everything that Amalek had done to us, which is the death that he caused to the world by his control—not to walk in the path of bestowal, to adhere to the Life of Lives—then we try to obliterate him from the face of the earth. Otherwise, before a person achieves the degree of knowing what Haman and Amalek did to us, a person does not crave to obliterate him.

It follows that specifically when one has reached the degree of knowing the cursed Haman from the blessed Mordechai, it is possible to blot out Amalek. For this reason, before Purim, which is the time when we should reach the degree, “until he does not know,” we must reach the degree of knowing, and only then can we blot out Amalek.

In other words, when a person wants to observe, “Blot out the memory of Amalek,” it is a sign that he has already been rewarded with knowing. Otherwise, a person cannot blot out Amalek. Rather, he is still immersed in the Klipa [shell/peel] of Amalek and does not want to keep, “Blot out the memory of Amalek.”

Now we will explain what our sages said, “On Purim, one must drink until he does not know the cursed Haman from the blessed Mordechai.” We asked, “What is the Gadlut [greatness/adulthood] that only on Purim can we do such a thing, meaning until “he does not know”? The holy ARI says (The Study of the Ten Sefirot, Part 16, Item 220), “Therefore, in the future, all the special days will be canceled except for the Book of Esther. The reason is that there has never been such a great miracle, not on Shabbats and not on good days, when there was such illumination even after the departure of the Mochin from the female, except in the days of Purim. In this respect, there is a great advantage to Purim over the rest of the days, even over Shabbats and good days.”

In the commentary Ohr Pnimi, he interprets there that before the end of correction it is impossible to correct all the sparks and Kelim that broke, but only the 288 sparks from the 320 sparks can be sorted and brought into Kedusha [sanctity]. Yet, this, too, will be sorted gradually, leaving 32 sparks out of all the sparks which must not be sorted. This is called the “stony heart.” Only by sorting the 288 sparks, when they are completely sorted, the stony heart will be sorted by itself, as well, as in, “And I will remove the stony heart from your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh. At that time, death will be swallowed up forever, all the bad will be corrected into good, and darkness will shine as light.”

Since these lights of Purim are a similitude of the end of correction, for they illuminated only thanks to the miracle, for this reason, all the special days are cancelled besides Purim, for it belongs to the end of correction. Then, when all the bad is corrected, there will be no difference between “the cursed Haman and the blessed Mordechai,” and Haman, too, will be corrected into good.

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

CARE ESTE SUBSTANŢA CALOMNIEI ŞI ÎMPOTRIVA CUI ESTE ACEASTA

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

What Is the Substance of Slander and Against Whom Is It?

Article No. 10, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

It is written in The Zohar (Metzora, Item 4), “Come and see, with the slander that the serpent said to the woman, he caused the woman and the man to be sentenced to death, them, and the whole world. It is written about slander, ‘And their tongue, a sharp sword.’ For this reason, ‘Beware the sword,’ meaning slander. ‘Wrath brings the punishments of the sword.’ What is, ‘Wrath brings the punishments of the sword’? It is the sword for the Creator, as we learned that the Creator has a sword with which He judges the wicked. It is written about it, ‘The Lord has a sword full of blood,’ ‘And My sword shall eat flesh,’ which is the Malchut from the side of Din [judgment] in her. Hence, ‘Beware the sword, for wrath brings the punishments of the sword, that you may know there is judgment.’

“It writes Din, but it means, ‘That you may know that thus it is judged,’ that anyone with a sword in his tongue who speaks slander, the sword that consumes everything is ready for him—the Malchut in the form of the Din in her. It is written about it, ‘This shall be the law of the leper.’ Malchut, which is called ‘this,’ sentences the leper because he slandered, for afflictions come for slander.” Thus far its words.

This needs to be understood, since The Zohar says that for anyone with a sword in his tongue, meaning who slanders, the sword that consumes everything is ready for him—the Malchut in the form of Din in her. And we learn this from what is written about the serpent, who slandered the woman. However, there the slander was about the Creator; how is this a proof between man and man, that it should be so grave as to cause death, as it explains about the verse, “And their tongue, a sharp sword,” about slander between man and man?

In other words, there is the same measure and severity of iniquity of slander between man and man as in slander between man and the Creator. Is it possible that one who slanders his friend will be similar to one who slanders the Creator?

When slandering the Creator, we can understand that it causes death, since by slandering the Creator he becomes separate from the Creator. For this reason, since he is separated from the Life of Lives, he is considered dead. But why should it cause death when the slander is between man and man?

The Zohar says that afflictions come for slander. Our sages said (Arachin 15b), “In the West they say: The talk of a third kills three: It kills the one who tells, the one who receives, and the one about whom it is said.” RASHI interprets “The talk of a third” as gossip, which is the third between man and man, revealing to him a secret. Also there, Rabbi Yohanan said in the name of Rabbi Yosi Ben Zimra: “Anyone who slanders, it is as though he denies the tenet.” And Rav Chisda said, “Mr. Ukva said, ‘Anyone who slanders, the Creator says, ‘He and I cannot dwell in the world.’’”

Also, we should understand the severity of the prohibition on slander, to the point that it is as though one has denied the tenet, or according to what Mr. Ukva says, that the Creator says, “He and I cannot dwell in the world.” It means that if we say, for example, that if Reuben said something bad to Shimon about Levi, that he did something bad, the Creator cannot dwell in the world, due to Reuben’s slander about Levi. But with other transgressions that Reuben might have committed, the Creator can dwell in the world with him. Thus, if this is such a grave matter, then we should understand what makes slander so bad.

We will interpret this in the work. In the essay “The Giving of the Torah,” he explains the great importance of the commandment, “Love thy friend as thyself.” “Rabbi Akiva says, ‘This is the great rule of the Torah.’ This statement of our sages demands explanation. The word Klal (collective/rule) indicates a sum of details that, when put together, form the above collective. Thus, when he says about the commandment, ‘Love thy friend as thyself,’ that it is a great Klal in the Torah, we must understand that the rest of the 612 commandments in the Torah, with all their interpretations, are no more or no less than the sum of the details inserted and contained in that single commandment, ‘Love thy friend as thyself.’

“This is quite perplexing, because you can say this regarding Mitzvot [commandments] between man and man, but how can that single Mitzva [commandment] contain all the Mitzvot between man and God, which are the essence and the vast majority of its laws?

“He also writes there about a convert who came before Hillel (Shabbat 31) and told him: ‘Teach me the whole of the Torah while I am standing on one leg.’ And he replied: ‘That which you hate, do not do unto your friend (the translation of ‘Love thy friend as thyself’), and the rest is commentary; go study.’

“Here before us is a clear law, that in all 612 commandments and in all the writings in the Torah there is none that is preferred to the commandment, ‘Love thy friend as thyself’ … since he specifically says, ‘the rest is commentary; go study.’ This means that the rest of the Torah is interpretations of that one commandment, that the commandment to love your friend as yourself could not be completed were it not for them.”

We should understand why, when the convert told him in the holy tongue [Hebrew], “Teach me the whole of the Torah while I am standing on one leg,” Hillel did not reply to him in the holy tongue, but replied to him in the language of translation [Aramaic] and told him, “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend.”

We should also understand that in the Torah, it is written, “Love thy friend as thyself,” which is a positive Mitzva [commandment to perform some action], but Hillel spoke in a negative term [commandment to avoid some action], for he told him, “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend,” which is negative phrasing.

In the essay “The Giving of the Torah,” he explains the greatness and importance of the rule, “Love thy friend as thyself,” since the purpose of creation is to do good to His creations, and for the creatures to feel delight and pleasure without any lacks. There is a rule that any branch wishes to resemble its root. Since our root is the Creator, who created all the creatures, He has no deficiencies or needs to receive anything from anyone.

Therefore, when the creatures receive from someone, they, too, feel ashamed of their benefactors. Thus, for the creatures not to be ashamed while receiving delight and pleasure from the Creator, the matter of Tzimtzum [restriction] was set up in the upper worlds. This causes the upper abundance to be hidden from us, so we do not feel the good that He has hidden in the Torah and Mitzvot that the Creator has given us.

We are made to believe that the corporeal pleasures that we see before us, feeling its virtue and benefit, and the whole world, meaning that all the creatures in this world devotedly chase after pleasures to obtain them. Still, there is but a tiny light in them, a very small illumination compared to what can be obtained by keeping Torah and Mitzvot. It is written about it in The Zohar that the Kedusha [holiness] sustains the Klipot [shells]. This means that if Kedusha did not give sustenance to the Klipot,they would not be able to exist.

There is a reason why the Klipot should exist, since in the end, everything will be corrected and will enter the Kedusha. This was given for the creatures to correct, for by having the concept of time for them, there can be two topics within the same topic, even though they are in contrast. It is written about it (“Introduction to The Book of Zohar,” Item 25), “For this reason, there are two systems, ‘Kedusha [holiness],’ and the ‘Impure ABYA,’ which are opposite to one another. Thus, how can the Kedusha correct them?”

This is not so with man, who is created in this world. Since there is a matter of time, they (two systems) are in one person, but one at a time. And then there is a way for Kedusha to correct the impurity. This is so because until thirteen years of age, a person attains the will to receive that is in the system of impurity. Afterward, through engagement in Torah, he begins to obtain Nefesh de [of] Kedusha, and then he is sustained by the system of the worlds of Kedusha.

Yet, all the abundance that the Klipot have, which they receive from the Kedusha, is but a tiny light that fell because of the breaking of the vessels and through the sin of the tree of knowledge, by which the impure ABYA were made. And yet, we should believe, imagine, and observe how all the creatures chase that tiny light with all their might, and none of them says, “I will settle for what I have acquired.” Instead, each always wishes to add to what he has, as our sages said, “One who has one hundred wants two hundred.”

And the reason why there was no wholeness in them is because there was no wholeness in them to begin with. But in spirituality, the upper light is dressed in everything spiritual. Hence, when a person attains some illumination of spirituality, he cannot tell if it is a small or a great degree, since in the spiritual, even the degree of Nefesh de Nefesh, which is a part of the Kedusha—and like the rest of Kedusha, it is wholeness—there is wholeness in even a part of it. This is so because the discernments of “great” or “small” in the upper light are according to the value of the receiver.

In other words, it depends on the level to which the receiver is capable of obtaining the greatness and importance of the light. But there is no change at all in the light itself, as it is written, “I the Lord (HaVaYaH), do not change” (as explained in the “Preface to the Wisdom of Kabbalah,” Item 63).

Accordingly, the question arises, “Why does the whole world chase the tiny light that shines in corporeal pleasures, while for spiritual pleasures, which hold the majority of delight and pleasure, we do not see anyone wishing to make such great efforts, as they make for corporeality?” However, corporeal pleasures are in the impure ABYA. There were no restriction or concealment on them, and purposely so, or the world would not exist, since it is impossible to live without pleasure.

Also, it extends from the purpose of creation to do good to His creations. Hence, without pleasure there is no existence to the world. It turns out that the pleasures had to be disclosed in them. This is not so with additions, meaning with receiving delight and pleasure for more than sustaining the body, which is the real pleasure. On that, there were restriction and concealment so they would not see the light of life that is clothed in Torah and Mitzvot, before a person accustoms himself to working in order to bestow, called “equivalence of form.” This is so because had the light that is clothed in Torah and Mitzvot been revealed, there would be no room for choice.

In other words, where the light is revealed, the pleasure that one would feel in keeping Torah and Mitzvot would be in the form of self-reception. Thus, he would not be able to say that he is keeping Torah and Mitzvot because of the commandment of the Creator. Rather, he would have to keep Torah and Mitzvot because of the pleasure that he feels in them. While a person feels pleasure in some transgressions, he can calculate that the pleasure is only a tiny light compared to the real taste in Torah and Mitzvot and how it is difficult to overcome the lust, and that the greater the desire, the harder it is to endure the test.

It turns out that while the immensity of the pleasure in Torah and Mitzvot is revealed, a person cannot say, “I am doing this Mitzva [commandment] because it is the Creator’s will,” meaning that he wants to give pleasure to the Creator by keeping His Mitzvot [commandments]. After all, without the Creator’s commandment, he would still keep Torah and Mitzvot because of self-love, and not because he wants to give to the Creator.

This is the reason for the placement of the restriction and the concealment on Torah and Mitzvot. And this is why the whole world chases corporeal pleasures, while having no energy for the pleasures in Torah and Mitzvot because the pleasure is not revealed for the above-mentioned reason.

It therefore follows that regarding faith, we must assume the importance there is in Torah and Mitzvot, and, in general, believe in the Creator—that He watches over the creatures. This means that one cannot say that he is not keeping Torah and Mitzvot because he does not feel the Creator’s guidance, how He gives abundance to the creatures, since here, too, he must believe, even though he does not feel it.

This is so because if he felt that His guidance is benevolent, there would be no question of faith there anymore. But why did the Creator make it so we would serve Him with faith? Would it not be better if we could serve in a state of knowing?

The answer is—as Baal HaSulam said it—that one shouldn’t think that the fact that the Creator wants us to serve Him with faith is because He cannot shine to us in the form of knowing. Rather, the Creator knows that faith is a more successful way for us to reach the goal, called “Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator,” which is equivalence of form. By that, we will have the power to receive the good while being without the “bread of shame,” meaning without shame. This is so because the only reason we will want to receive delight and pleasure from the Creator is that we will know that the Creator will derive pleasure from it. And since we wish to bestow upon the Creator, we wish to receive delight and pleasure from Him.

Thus, we see that the main work we must do, to achieve the purpose for which the world was created—to do good to His creations—is to qualify ourselves to acquire vessels of bestowal. This is the correction for making the King’s gift complete, so they will feel no shame upon reception of the pleasures. And all the evil in us removes us from the good that we are destined to receive.

We were given the remedy of Torah and Mitzvot so as to achieve those Kelim. This is the meaning of what our sages said (Kidushin 30), “The Creator says, ‘I have created the evil inclination; I have created for it the spice of Torah,’ by which he will lose all the sparks of self-love within him and will be rewarded with his desire being only to bestow contentment upon his Maker.”

In the essay “The Giving of the Torah” (Item 13), he says, “There are two parts in the Torah: 1) Mitzvot [commandments] between man and God, 2) Mitzvot between man and man. And both aim for the same thing—to bring the creature to the final goal of Dvekut with Him.

“Furthermore, even the practical side in both of them is really one and the same. … Toward those who keep Torah and Mitzvot Lishma, there is no difference between the two parts of the Torah, even on the practical side. This is because before one accomplishes it, one is compelled to feel any act of bestowal—either toward another person or toward the Creator—as emptiness beyond conception…

“Since this is the case, it is reasonable to think that the part of the Torah that deals with man’s relationship with his friend is better capable of bringing one to the desired goal. This is because the work in Mitzvot between man and God is fixed and specific and is not demanding, one becomes easily accustomed to it, and everything that is done out of habit is no longer useful. But the Mitzvotbetween man and man are changing and irregular, and demands surround him wherever he may turn. Hence, their cure is much more certain and their aim is closer.”

Now we understand why Rabbi Akiva said about the verse, “Love thy friend as thyself,” that it is “the great rule of the Torah.” It is because the important thing is to be rewarded with Dvekut with the Creator, which is called “a vessel of bestowal,” meaning equivalence of form. This is why the remedy of Torah and Mitzvot was given, so that through it we would be able to exit self-love and reach love of others, as stage one is the love between a person and his friend, and then we can achieve the love of the Creator.

Now we can understand what we asked above, why when the convert came to Hillel and told him, “Teach me the whole of the Torah while I am standing on one leg,” Hillel did not reply to him in the holy tongue, as he asked, “Teach me the whole of the Torah while I am standing on one leg,” but replied to him in the language of translation [Aramaic], “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend” (the translation of “Love thy friend as thyself”). And there is more to understand, since in the Torah, it is written, “Love thy friend as thyself,” which is a positive Mitzva [commandment to perform some action], while he replied to the convert in a negative tongue, “Do not do,” since he told him, “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend.”

According to what he explains about the importance of the Mitzva, “Love thy friend as thyself,” in his explanation of the words of Rabbi Akiva, who said that “Love thy friend as thyself” is the great rule of the Torah, that specifically this Mitzva has the power to bring one the remedy for reaching the love of the Creator, for this reason, when the convert came to Hillel and told him, “Teach me the whole of the Torah while I’m standing on one leg,” he wished to tell him the rule, “Love thy friend as thyself,” as it is written in the Torah. However, he wished to explain to him the grave iniquity called “slander,” which is even graver than the Mitzva, “Love thy friend as thyself.”

The Mitzva, “Love thy friend as thyself” gives one the power to overcome and exit self-love. By exiting self-love, he can achieve the love of the Creator.

It follows that if he does not engage in the Mitzva, “Love thy friend as thyself,” he is in a state of “sit and do nothing.” He did not progress in coming out of the domination of self-love, but did not regress, either. In other words, although he did not give love to others, he also did not relapse and did nothing to evoke hatred of others.

Yet, if he slanders his friend, by that, he relapses. Not only does he not engage in love of others, he does the opposite—engages in actions that cause hatred of others by slandering his friend. Naturally, one does not slander one he loves, for it separates the hearts. Therefore, we do not wish to slander one that we love so as not to spoil the love between us, since slander inflicts hatred.

It therefore follows that the severity of the iniquity of slander is that love of others yields love of the Creator, and hatred of others yields hatred of the Creator, and there is nothing worse in the world than that which yields hatred of the Creator. But when a person sins with other transgressions and cannot overcome his will to receive because he is immersed in self-love, it still does not make him hate the Creator. This is why it is written about the rest of the transgressions, “I am the Lord, who dwells with them in the midst of their impurity.” But in regards to slander, by this action he becomes hateful of the Creator, as it is the very opposite act of love of others.

Now we can understand the words of Rabbi Yohanan in the name of Rabbi Yosi Ben Zimra: “Anyone who slanders, it is as though he denies the tenet.” Can it be that slander would make one deny the tenet? However, since it causes him to hate the Creator, he denies the very purpose of creation—to do good. And we see that one who does good to another and gives him more delight and pleasure each time, certainly loves him. But when a person slanders, it makes him hate the Creator. Thus, this person denies the very purpose of creation—to do good.

Now we can also understand what we asked about what Rav Hasda said in the name of Mr. Ukva: “Anyone who slanders, the Creator says, ‘He and I cannot dwell in the world.’” Is it possible that slander could cause the Creator not to dwell in the world with him?

As we said above, one who slanders becomes hateful of the Creator. As in corporeality, a person can be in a house with many people and yet be indifferent to whether they are good people or not. But when he sees his hater there, he immediately runs away from there, for he cannot be in a single room with a hater. Similarly, we say that one who becomes hateful of the Creator, the Creator cannot be with him in the world.

We could ask, “But one who steals something from his friend also causes his friend to hate, since when the one from whom it was stolen finds out that he stole, he will see that he is his hater?” Or, we could say that even if he never knows who stole from him, the thief himself—instead of engaging in love of others—engages in an opposite act, in hatred of others, by which he becomes more immersed in self-love. And yet, they do not say that stealing is as bad as slander. Also, it means that robbing is not as grave as slander, too.

The answer should be that one who engages in stealing or robbing does not rob or steal because of hatred. The reason is that he has love for money or for important artifacts, and this is why he steals or robs, not because of hate. But with slander, it is not because of some fancy, but only out of hatred.

It is as Rish Lakish said (Arachin 15), “Rish Lakish said, ‘Why is it written, ‘If the serpent bites without whispering, there is no advantage to the one with the tongue?’ In the future, all the animals will come to the serpent and tell him, ‘The lion preys and eats; a wolf preys and eats. But you, what pleasure have you?’ He tells them, ‘And what is the advantage of the one with the tongue?’’”

RASHI interprets, “‘A lion preys and eats,’ all who harm people derive pleasure. The lion preys and eats. He eats of what is alive. And if a wolf preys, it kills first and then eats. It has pleasure. But you, what is your pleasure in biting people? The serpent replied, ‘And what is the advantage of the one with the tongue? One who slanders, what joy does he have? Similarly, when I bite, I get no pleasure.’”

With the above said, we can see that there is a difference between harming people because one derives pleasure, such as the lion and the wolf, who have no desire to harm because they hate people, but because of desire, since they take pleasure in people. Thus, the reason why they harm others is only out of desire.

This is not so with slander. One does not receive any reward for it, but it is an act that causes hatred of people. And according to the rule, “Love thy friend as thyself,” where from love of man one comes to love of the Creator, it follows that from hatred of people one can come to hatred of the Creator.

Similarly, we find these words (Berachot 17a): “‘The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom; a good understanding have all they that do them.’ It did not say, ‘That do,’ but ‘That do them,’ they who do Lishma [for Her sake] and not they who do Lo Lishma [not for Her sake]. And anyone who does Lo Lishma, it is better for him to not be born. In the Tosfot, he asks, ‘And if the sayer should say, ‘Rav Yehuda said, ‘Rav said, ‘One should always engage in Torah and Mitzvot, even in Lo Lishma, for out of Lo Lishma he will come to Lishma.’’’’ We should say, ‘Here we are dealing with one who is learning only in order to annoy his friends, and there it was about one who is learning in order to be respected.’”

We should understand the answer of the Tosfot, when he says that we should distinguish between Lo Lishma in order to annoy and Lo Lishma in order to be respected, meaning to call him “a rabbi” and so on. We should understand it according to the rule that Rabbi Akiva said, “Love thy friend as thyself is the great rule of the Torah.” By what he explains in the essay “The Giving of the Torah,” it is because through this Mitzva [commandment] he will acquire love of others, and from this he will later come to love of the Creator.

It therefore follows that one should try to exit self-love, and then he will be able to engage in Torah and Mitzvot Lishma, meaning in order to bestow and not for his own benefit. This is done by keeping Torah and Mitzvot. Thus, as long as he does not exit self-love, he cannot engage in Lishma. And although he engages in self-love, there is power in keeping Torah and Mitzvot in order to exit self-love and from that to subsequently come to love of the Creator, at which time he will do everything in order to bestow.

Achieving Lishma is possible only when he engages in Torah and Mitzvot in order to be respected. That is, he is learning but he still cannot work for the sake of others, since he hasn’t acquired the quality of love of others. Hence, engagement in Torah and Mitzvot will help him achieve the quality of love of others.

But when he learns in order to annoy, which is an opposite act from love of others, keeping Torah and Mitzvot for the hatred of others, in order to annoy, how can two opposites be in the same carrier? Meaning, it is said that the Torah assists in achieving love of others when one performs an act of bestowal—although the intention is to receive a prerogative, the Torah assists him toward the intention of obtaining the desire to bestow, as well. But here he engages in the very opposite, in hatred of others. How can this cause love of others?

It is as we said about the distinction between a thief or a robber, and a slanderer. Thieves and robbers love money, gold, and other important things. They have no personal dealings with the individual himself. In other words, thieves and robbers have no thought or consideration of the person himself, but their thoughts are focused on where they can get more money more easily, and with greater difficulty for the police to expose them as the thieves or robbers. But they never think of the person himself.

With slander, however, one has no consideration of the act itself when he slanders. Rather, his only thought is to humiliate his friend in the eyes of people. Thus, the only thought is one of hatred. It is a rule that one does not slander one he loves. Hence, it is specifically slander that causes hatred of others, which subsequently leads to hatred of the Creator. For this reason, slander is a very grave iniquity, which actually brings destruction of the world.

Now we will explain the measure of slander—how and how much is considered slander, whether a word or a sentence that is said about one’s friend is already considered slander. We find this measure in Hillel’s answer to the convert, “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend.” This means that with any word that you want to say about your friends, observe and consider if you would hate it if this was said about you. In other words, if you would derive no pleasure from these words, “Do not do unto your friend.”

Thus, when one wishes to say something about one’s friend, he should immediately think, “If this were said about me, would I hate that word?” “Do not do unto your friend,” as Hillel said to the convert. From here we should learn the measure of slander that is forbidden to say.

And with the above said, we can understand why Hillel spoke to the convert in the language of translation and not in the holy tongue [Hebrew], just as to the convert, who told him [in Hebrew], “Teach me the whole of the Torah while I am standing on one leg.” Instead, he spoke in the language of translation, meaning that what he told him was, “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend” [in Aramaic], the translation of “Love thy friend as thyself.”

First, we should understand what the language of translation implies to us. The Ari said (The Study of the Ten Sefirot, Part 15, p 1765), “‘And the Lord God caused a deep sleep’ is translation in Gematria [Tardema (sleep) = Targum (translation)], and it is considered Achoraim [posterior].” This means that the holy tongue [Hebrew] is called Panim [anterior] and the translation [Aramaic] is called Achoraim [posterior].

Panim means something that illuminates or something whole. Achor [back] means something that is not illuminating or is incomplete. In the holy tongue, which is called Panim, it writes, “Love thy friend as thyself,” which is wholeness, since through love of man one achieves the love of the Creator, which is the completion of the goal, for one should achieve Dvekut [adhesion], as it is written, “And to cleave unto Him.”

But the translation of “Love thy friend as thyself” that Hillel told him, “That which you hate, do not do unto your friend,” we should say that it relates to slander, which is about negation, that slander is forbidden because it brings hatred, and from this, one might come to hatred of the Creator. However, this is still not considered wholeness because by not slandering, one still does not achieve love of others, and from love of others he will reach wholeness, called Dvekut with the Creator.

However, this is why slander is worse, since not only does he not engage in love of others, he does the opposite—engages in hatred of others. For this reason, when teaching the general public to begin the work, they are first taught how to not spoil and harm the public. This is called “avoiding.” Otherwise, you are harming the public by doing things to harm.

This is why Hillel said to the convert who came to him only the translation of “Love thy friend as thyself”: 1) Because it is more harmful when slandering, for it causes hatred, which is the opposite of love of others. 2) Because it is easier to keep, for this is only in “sit and do not do.” But “Love thy friend” is “Rise up and do,” when one should take action to sustain the love of friends.

However, afterwards there are exceptions: people who each wish to be a servant of the Creator personally. A person is told that the matter of “Love thy friend,” which is the rule that Rabbi Akiva said—as above-mentioned, that love of others can bring him to achieve love of the Creator—is the main goal: that one will have vessels of bestowal and that in these vessels he will be able to receive delight and pleasure, which is the purpose of creation, to do good to His creation.

Two methods in education extend from this:

  1. Focusing the learning on not slandering because this is the worst iniquity.
  2. Focusing the education on “Love thy friend,” since this will bring man to love others, and from love of others he will come to love of the Creator, and from love of the Creator he can then receive the purpose of creation—to do good to His creations. This is because he will already have the suitable vessels for receiving the upper abundance, as he will have vessels of bestowal, which he has obtained by love of others. And then there will be no room for slander.

Concerning slander, The Zohar says that the serpent’s slandering to the woman caused death to the world. It says there that the sword that consumes everything is ready for anyone with a sword in his tongue, meaning who slanders. And The Zohar concludes, “As it is written, ‘This will be the law of the leper,’ as for afflictions come for slander.” It follows that he began with death and ended with afflictions, which means that only afflictions come and not death.

Certainly, there are explanations for the literal meaning. But in the work, we should interpret that afflictions and death are one and the same. In other words, the purpose of the work is to achieve Dvekut with the Creator, to adhere to the Life of Lives. By this we will have suitable vessels for reception of the delight and pleasure that is found in the purpose of creation, to do good to His creations. Through slander, he becomes a hater of the Creator, and there is no greater separation than this. Certainly, by that he becomes separated from the Life of Lives.

It follows that where he should have received delight and pleasure from the Creator, he receives the opposite. In other words, instead of pleasure, it becomes affliction [in Hebrew “pleasure” and “affliction” contain the same letters]. This is the meaning that through slander, afflictions come instead of pleasures. This is the meaning of “The wicked, in their lives, are called ‘dead,’” since they are separated from the Life of Lives. It follows that in the work, death and afflictions are the same.

In other words, if one adheres to the Life of Lives, he receives abundance from Him. And if it is to the contrary and he becomes separated from Him, then he is full of afflictions where he should have been filled with pleasures.

With the above-said, we can interpret what they said (Arachin 15), “In the West they say: The talk of a third kills three: It kills the one who tells, the one who receives, and the one about whom it is said.” We know the words of our sages, “The Torah, Israel, and the Creator are one.” It means, as explained in the book A Sage’s Fruit (Part One, p 65), that Israel is one who wishes to adhere to the Creator. He achieves this through the 613 Mitzvot [commandments] of the Torah, at which time he is rewarded with the Torah, which is the names of the Creator. And then everything becomes one. It turns out that one who slanders causes the killing of three: 1) the one who tells, 2) the one who receives, 3) the one about whom it is said.

The three discernments are to be made between man and man.

However, between man and the Creator there is also the matter of slander, as mentioned concerning “The Torah, Israel, and the Creator are one.” When a person comes and looks in the Torah, he sees all those good things that the Creator has promised us in keeping the Torah. For example, it is written, “For this is your life,” and it is also written, “They are more desirable than gold, yes, than much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and the drippings of the honeycomb,” and other such verses. If a person is not rewarded and does not feel it, this is called “slandering the Creator.”

It follows that three discernments should be made here: 1) the slanderer, 2) the Torah, 3) the Creator.

When a person looks in the Torah, if he is not rewarded, he does not see the delight and pleasure clothed in the holy Torah, and stops learning the Torah because he says he found no meaning in it. Thus, in speaking of the Torah, he is slandering the Creator.

It follows that he blemishes three things: the Torah, Israel, and the Creator. Where one should exert to make the unification of “Are one”—that they will all shine, meaning that the discernment of Israel will obtain the unification that the whole Torah is the names of the Creator—he causes separation in that, through slander.

A person must believe above reason that what the Torah promises us is true, and the only fault is in us—that we are still unfit to receive the delight and pleasure, called “the hidden light” or “the flavors of Torah and Mitzvot,” as it is written in The Zohar that the whole Torah is the names of the Creator.

To achieve this, we need vessels of bestowal—to have equivalence of form between the light and the Kli [vessel]. Achieving vessels of bestowal is done by love of friends. It is as Rabbi Akiva said, “Love thy friend as thyself is the great rule of the Torah,” for through it we achieve love of others, and through love of others we arrive at love of the Creator and the love of Torah. The Torah is called “a gift,” and gifts are given to loved ones. The opposite of this is slander, which causes hatred of people and hatred of the Creator, as we said above.

Now we can understand what our sages said about slander, “The talk of a third kills three: It kills the one who tells, the one who receives, and the one about whom it is said.” RASHI interprets that out of hatred they provoke one another and kill each other. We can understand that this applies between man and man; but how does this apply between man and the Creator?

When a person looks in the Torah and tells the Torah that he does not see or feel the delight and pleasure that the Creator said that He is giving to the people of Israel, he is slandering the Creator. There are three things here: the telling person, the receiver, meaning the Torah, and the one of whom it is said, meaning the Creator. Since when a person engages in love of others, he obtains the love of the Creator and the love of Torah, in that state, the Creator imparts upon him life, as it is written, “For with You is the source of life.” This is from the side of Dvekut [adhesion], as it is written, “And you who cleave.”

In that state, one is rewarded with the law of life. But through slander, the life from the Creator, which he should have received, is withheld from him. Thus, 1) the life from the Torah—where he should have sensed the Torah of life—is withheld from him, 2) he himself becomes lifeless, which is considered that he is killed, and 3) life stops in three places. And through the love of others, life flows from two places and he is the receiver of the life.

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

MĂREŢIA CUIVA DEPINDE DE MĂSURA ÎNCREDERII SALE ÎN VIITOR

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future

Article No. 09, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

It is written in The Zohar (BeShalach, Item 216): “‘Then shall Moses … sing.’ It should have said, ‘Sang.’ And it replies, ‘But this thing depends on the future, when he complemented for that time and complemented for the future, when Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future.’ ‘This singing’ is in female form [in Hebrew], but it should have said, ‘This song,’ in male form [in Hebrew]. And it replies, ‘This singing is that the queen praises the King.’ Rabbi Yehuda said, ‘Thus, if it is the singing of the queen to the King, why does it say, ‘Moses and the children of Israel’? After all, the queen should have been the one who is praising.’ It replies, ‘Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.’”

We should understand the answer that he gives about what is written in future tense, that it refers to the future. What does it come to teach us in the work? We should also understand about the answer he is giving, why it writes “singing” in female form, which interprets the intention to Malchut, meaning that Malchut is praising the King, about which Rabbi Yehuda asked. Thus, if he is referring to Malchut, why does it say, “Moses and the children of Israel”? For this reason, he must interpret that his intention is Moses and Israel, who know how to praise the King for the Malchut. We should also understand the meaning of Moses and Israel having to praise the King for the Malchut, and why they do not have to praise the King for themselves, but for Malchut.

It is known that Moses is called “the faithful shepherd.” Baal HaSulam interpreted that Moses was providing Israel with faith, and faith is called Malchut [kingship]. In other words, he instilled fear of heaven, called “kingdom of heaven,” into the people of Israel. This is why Moses is called “the faithful shepherd,” after the faith. It is written about it, “And they believed in the Lord and in his servant, Moses,” meaning for Moses instilling in them faith in the Creator.

It is known that one cannot live from negativity, but from positivity. This is so because “nourishment” refers to what a person receives and enjoys receiving. This comes to us from the purpose of creation, called “His desire to do good to His creations.” Therefore, a person must receive delight and pleasure so as to have something with which to delight one’s body. This is called “positivity,” meaning a filling. And with this filling, he satisfies his needs.

But a person also needs a lack. Otherwise, there is no place in which the light of life can enter. A lack is called “a Kli” [a vessel]. This means that if one has no Kelim [vessels], he cannot receive anything. A lack is called “a desire,” meaning that he has a desire for something and he feels that he is lacking this thing and wishes to satisfy the need. To the extent that he feels its absence and to the extent that he needs to satisfy his need, this is the measure of his lack. In other words, a great lack or a small lack depends on the measure of one’s sense of necessity to satisfy that need.

This means that if a person comes to feel that he is lacking something, and he feels that feeling in his every organ, yet he does not have a strong desire to satisfy his need, there are many reasons why he does not have such a great desire to satisfy his need.

  1. He told his friends what he needs, and he feels the necessity for it. However, the friends made him see that what he needs is unattainable. So his friends influenced him with their views that he must accept his situation. They weakened his strength to overcome so he can prevail over the obstacles on his way to obtaining what he wants. In consequence, the need and craving weakened, too, since he sees that he will never obtain what he wants. For this reason, meaning because he sees that it is utterly impossible that he will ever be able to satisfy his need, this is the reason why he does not obtain his goal—it causes him to lessen his lack. It turns out that his great desire has waned due to despair.
  2. Sometimes he does not even tell his friends what he wants; he only hears from friends speaking with each other. He hears that they have already given up, and that affects him, too. In other words, their despair affects him and he loses the enthusiasm that he had for achievingDvekut [adhesion] as soon as possible. Thus, he loses that willpower.
  3. Sometimes one thinks for himself without any slander from the outside, but sees that each time he wishes to draw near to Kedusha [holiness], when he begins to analyze, he realizes the opposite, that he is regressing instead of moving forward. And this causes him to lose his strength for the work.

It turns out that then he collapses under his load. He has nothing from which to receive sustenance because he sees only negativity and darkness. Thus, he loses the spirit of life that he had when he seemingly had some livelihood, called “sustaining his soul.” Now he feels spiritually dead, meaning he cannot make a single movement in the work, just as if he were actually dead.

This means that even though now he sees the truth, meaning the recognition of evil, it is negative, and from this, one cannot receive any livelihood, since provision of the body is specifically from positivity. Therefore, one must walk on the right line for two reasons: 1) to keep his desire from waning when he hears slander, 2) to receive vitality, which is specifically from positivity, meaning that it is positive, that there is a matter of wholeness here.

However, it is difficult to understand how, when he criticizes his work-order and sees that his being immersed in self-love is the truth, how can he be told to walk on the right line, which is called “wholeness”? After all, as far as he can see, when he judges honestly, it is a total lie.

It is known that general and particular are equal. This means that the individual follows the same order that applies to the collective. In regard to the collective, it was given to us to believe in the coming of the Messiah (in the prayer, “I Believe”), “I believe in the coming of the Messiah. And though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”

Hence, one must never give up and say, “I see that I cannot obtain Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator.” This is considered that he exits the exile among the nations of the world, called “self-love,” and comes under the authority of Kedusha [holiness], and comes to correct the root of his soul and cling to the Life of Lives.

It follows that if one believes in the general redemption, he should believe that redemption will come to him in particular. Hence, one should receive wholeness for himself with respect to the future, in a way that one should depict for himself the measure of goodness, pleasure, and joy that he will receive when all his needs are satisfied. This certainly gives him emotional satisfaction and energy to work to obtain this goal that he hopes to achieve.

It turns out that first one must depict for himself what he is hoping for—that it will make him happy and joyful if he obtains what he anticipates. However, first one should thoroughly know the goal he wants to obtain. If one does not pay close attention and much scrutiny to what he expects from his life, meaning that he should tell himself, “Now I have decided what I want, after analyzing the joy in life that can be obtained in the world.”

If he has the opportunity to obtain this, he will have the strength and wisdom to say, “Now I can thank the Creator for creating His world.” Now he can wholeheartedly say, “Blessed is He who said, ‘Let there be the world,’ since I feel the delight and pleasure, that it is truly worthwhile for me and for all creations to receive this delight and pleasure that I have now received from the purpose of creation, called ‘His desire to do good to His creations.’”

And although he is still far from obtaining the goal, if he nonetheless knows for certain from what he can receive his future happiness, it is as it is written (Avot, Chapter 6), “Rabbi Meir says, ‘Anyone who engages in Torah Lishma [for Her sake] is rewarded with a great many things. Moreover, the whole world is worthwhile for him. He is let into the secrets of the Torah and he becomes like an everlasting spring.’”

When he pays attention to this—to what he can achieve—meaning when he feels the importance of the goal and depicts for himself the happiness he will achieve, the joy that he will experience when he attains it are unimaginable.

Thus, to the extent that he believes in the importance of the goal, and to the extent that he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can receive the filling of the light of life from the future goal. It is known that there is inner light and there is surrounding light. Baal HaSulam interpreted “inner light” as referring to what one receives in the present, and “surrounding light” as the light that is destined to shine, but which one has not yet attained. However, the surrounding light shines, to an extent, in the present, to the extent of his confidence that he will attain it.

He said that this is like a person who bought merchandise from the market. Since many people brought this merchandise to the market, it had little value. All the merchants wanted to sell the merchandise at any price, but there were no buyers because everyone was afraid to buy, perhaps it might grow even cheaper.

Then one man bought all the merchandise for a very low price. When he came home and told them what happened in the market, they all laughed at him: “What did you do? Of course all the merchants wanted to sell all the merchandise they had in stock. This will only make everything cheaper, and as a result, you will lose all your money.”

But he insisted, saying, “Now I am happier than ever, since I will profit from this merchandise not as before, when I knew I could get twenty percent profit from the merchandise. Instead, I’ll make a five hundred percent profit. However, I will not sell it now. I will store it and I will take it to the market in three years, for by then this merchandise will not be found here in the country, and I will get the price that I want.”

It turns out that if he calculates how much he has earned in the present, meaning this year, then he has nothing. This is considered that he has nothing in the present with which to be happy.

This is an allegory about the inner light, which shines in the present. However, the surrounding light, called “light that shines specifically in the future,” shines in the present, too, to the extent of his belief that in the future he will receive the full reward he hopes for, and then his joy will be complete. Now he is receiving joy and high spirits from what he will receive in the future.

This explains the above allegory, that this merchant was ridiculed by everyone for buying the merchandise in the market precisely when it was irrelevant, when no one wanted to buy it. Yet, he bought it as something that others left because it was worthless, and now he is delighted because he is one hundred percent sure that in three years this merchandise will not be found anywhere and then he will get rich. And so, he enjoys in the present what will happen in the future.

It follows that to the extent that he believes that it will come to him—and does not despair about the future—as it is written, “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can enjoy in the present what will come in the future.

Thus, when a person is told that even though he walked on the left line—meaning criticized and saw that he was in utter baseness—and he sees this truth, since he does not wish to deceive himself and justify his thoughts and actions, but seeks the truth and does not care if the truth is bitter, yet he wishes to reach the goal for which he was born, but because of all this truth he cannot go on living, since it is impossible to live without pleasure, called “vitality” and “life.” To live, one needs light, which revives a person. By living, it is possible to work and to reach the goal. For this reason, he must then shift to the right line, called “wholeness.”

However, this wholeness—from which he now receives the liveliness that sustains his body—should be built on a basis of truth. This brings up the question, “How can he receive wholeness when he sees the truth, that he is in the lowest state, immersed in self-love from head to toe and without a spark of bestowal?”

To that he should say, “Everything I see is true.” However, it is so from the perspective of the inner light. This means that in the present, he is in lowliness and has nothing from which to receive joy and life. But from the perspective of the surrounding light, which is the future, he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”

It turns out that through the surrounding light that shines in relation to the future, he can draw it so it will shine in the present. And to the extent of the faith and confidence that he has in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, he can draw vitality and joy so it will shine in the present.

It follows that now that he is walking on the right line to receive wholeness, it is the real truth, since the surrounding light shines in the present. And besides, it is a path of truth, and since by believing in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, it is a great remedy that through the commandment of faith, the future will draw nearer to the present in him. This means that the surrounding light will be internal. This is considered that the light actually dresses in the present. It is called “the surrounding will become internal.”

Thus, from here—meaning from faith, from believing that in the end he will reach the goal, even though reason shows him each time that he is retreating from the goal and not advancing—he overcomes and goes above reason. And then faith itself accumulates each time in the form of “penny by penny joins into a great amount,” until he is rewarded with permanent whole faith, which is the attainment of the light of Hassadim in illumination of Hochma, as it is written in the Sulamcommentary.

Now we can understand what we asked about why The Zohar explains that this is why it is written, “Shall … sing,” in future tense. By that, it implies that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. What does that come to teach us in the work? In matters of work, we should know what we have now, in the present, and know what we must do. Thus, what can we learn about what the future holds?

As we explained, we must walk on the right line, which is wholeness, and receive vitality from it, because it is impossible to live from negativity. Hence, there is advice to feel wholeness from what will be in the future. This is the meaning of what the righteous call, “singing in the future.” In other words, now—in the present—they are singing about what they will receive in the future. This means that to the extent that they picture the delight and pleasure they will receive in the future, they can feel it in the present, provided they have faith that there is a future, meaning that in the future everyone will be corrected.

This is something one can already be thankful for in the present. To the extent that he feels it, this is the measure of the praise that he can give in the present. And besides receiving life in the present from positivity, he gains from the goal in general being important for him because he must picture for himself the delight and pleasure in store for the creatures to receive.

And each time he contemplates the matter, he gradually sees a bit more of what he can receive in the future, meaning what has been prepared for us by the purpose of creation. And although he sees that in his current state he is miles away from the goal, this depends on the measure of his faith in the goal, as in the example of the allegory above. This follows the rule, “All that is certain to be collected is deemed collected” (Yevamot 38).

With the above, we can understand what The Zohar explains—that the reason why it writes “Shall … sing,” in future tense, is to imply that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. This is so because we must know this, so we can receive joy and vitality in the present from what will be in the future. By this we can sing in the present as if now we were receiving all the delight and pleasure.

This is regarded as being able to receive illumination from a surrounding. In other words, the surrounding shines in the internal from afar, meaning that although a person is still far from obtaining the delight and pleasure, he can still draw illumination from the Surrounding Light also in the present.

Now we will explain what we asked about The Zohar explaining why he writes, “This singing” in female form [in Hebrew]. It is because Moses and Israel know how to properly praise the King for the queen. And we asked, “Why do Moses and Israel not praise the King for themselves?”

First, we must understand why we have to praise the King. In corporeality, we understand that a flesh and blood king needs honors, to be respected. He enjoys the praises that the people give him. But with regard to the Creator, why does He need us to praise Him and sing before Him chants and songs?

It is a known rule that everything we say in regard to the Creator is only by way of “By Your actions we know You.” However, there is no attainment in Him, Himself, whatsoever. Rather, all we speak of relates to the attainment of the lower ones.

This is the reason why one must praise and thank the Creator, for by this one can measure and assume the greatness and importance of the giving that the Creator has given him. To that extent, one can test how much importance and greatness of the King he feels.

The purpose of creation is to do good to His creations, meaning for the creatures to enjoy Him. And by the measure of the greatness of the Giver, there is meaning and pleasure in giving, that they give Him in order to delight. And when one tries to give thanks, he already has reason for considering and scrutinizing the giving: what he received and from whom he received, meaning the greatness of the giving and the greatness of the giver.

It follows that one’s gratitude should not be because the upper one will enjoy it, but so that the lower one will enjoy it. Otherwise, it is similar to the allegory that Baal HaSulam said about the verse, “Who has not taken My name in vain.”

He asked, “What does it mean that a person takes in vain? Does it mean that he was given a soul from above in vain?” He said that it is similar to a child being given a bag of gold coins. He is delighted about the coins because they look so nice and are lovely to look at. But the child is incapable of assessing the value of the gold coins.

From this we can understand that the gratitude and praise that we give to the Creator are only to benefit the creatures, meaning that we have something by which to praise the King. This means that when one tries to praise the Creator, this is the time when he is capable of feeling the importance of the gift and the importance of the giver of the gift. For this reason, what one should mind most is the praise that one gives to the King. This enables him to be given every time anew. Otherwise, if one cannot appreciate the King’s gift, one cannot be given anything because he falls under the definition of “Who is a fool? He who loses what he is given” (Hagigah 4a).

And what is the reason that a fool loses what he is given? This is simple: He is a fool. He does not appreciate the importance of the matter, so he does not pay attention to keeping the gift that he has been given. For this reason, the extent of the importance of the gift is his keeping of it. Thus, he can be in a state of constant ascension because it is evident that he does not lose what he is given, for he appreciates it.

It follows from the above that one may have many descents because he does not appreciate the gift of the King. In other words, he cannot appreciate the measure of importance of the nearing—that he has been given from above a desire and a thought that it is worthwhile to be a servant of the Creator.

And since he did not appreciate the importance of the matter, meaning the calling that he was given—to enter and serve the King—he might even corrupt, if he serves the King without knowing how to keep himself from blemishing something. In that state, a person is thrown back to a place of garbage and waste.

In that state, he sustains himself on the same waste that cats and dogs search to sustain themselves, and he, too, searches for provision for his body in that place. He does not see that he can find provision elsewhere. Meaning, during the descent, those things that he said were waste and unfit as food for humans—but are suitable as food only for animals—he himself chases that provision and has no desire for human food because he finds it completely tasteless.

For this reason, the stability of the states of ascent depends primarily on the importance of the matter. This is why it depends mainly on the praise and gratitude he gives to being accepted from above. This is so because the praises themselves that he gives to the Creator enhance His importance and esteem. This is why we are commanded to think very seriously about praising.

There are three discernments in regard to praising:

1. The measure of the giving. This means that the importance of the gift is according to the measure of praise and gratitude that one gives for the gift.

2. The greatness of the giver, meaning if the giver is an important person. For example, if the king gives a present to someone, the gift may be a very small thing but it will still be very important. In other words, the measure of the praise and gratitude does not take the greatness of the gift into account, but rather measures the greatness of the giver. Meaning, the same person might give to two people, but to one, the giver is more important and he recognizes the importance and greatness of the giver. Thus, he will be more grateful than the other, who does not recognize the importance of the giver to the same extent.

3. The greatness of the giver, regardless of whether he gives or not. Sometimes, the king is so important in the eyes of a person, that the person has a strong desire to merely speak to the king, but not because he wishes to speak to the king so the king will give him something. He doesn’t want anything, but his whole pleasure is in having the privilege of speaking to the king.

However, it is impolite to come to the king without some request, so he is searching for some request that the king may grant. In other words, he says that he wants to come to the king so the king will give him something, but in truth, he says that he wants the king to give him something only on the outside. In his heart, he does not want anything from the king. Just having the ability to speak to the king is enough for him and it does not matter to him if the king has given him something or not.

When people on the outside see that he did not receive a thing from the king, and look at him as he is walking out of the king’s house delighted and elated, they laugh at him. They tell him, “What a fool you are! How mindless are you? You can see for yourself that you are leaving as empty-handed as you came in. You walked into the king to ask for something of the king, yet you walked out empty-handed, so why the joy?”

We can understand this if while a person prays to the Creator to give him something, we can discern about it, 1) that one prays to the Creator to give him what he demands of the Creator. If He accepts his demand for the prayer to be granted, when he receives what he wants, he is willing to thank the Creator. And the extent of salvation that he received from the Creator is the extent of his joy, high spirits, praise, and gratitude. In other words, everything is measured by the degree of salvation he has received from the Creator.

2) The measure of the greatness of the Giver. In other words, to the extent that he believes in the greatness of the Creator, this is what determines for him what he receives from the Creator. That is, even though in the eyes of the receiver it is a small thing, he still received something from the Creator. Thus, he can already be happy and praise and thank the Creator, since it is the giver who is important to him, as in the above-mentioned allegory.

3) The greatness of the giver without giving. He, too, has great importance. In other words, the king is so important in his eyes that he does not want anything from the king, but will consider it great fortune if he can speak even a few words with the king. And the reason why he comes in with some request is only superficial, since one cannot come before the king without some request. Yet, he did not come for the king to grant his request. The reason he said he was asking for something was only for the external ones, who do not understand that speaking to the king is the most valuable giving, but the external ones do not understand it.

When we speak of a single body, we should say that “external ones” are the thoughts that come to a person from the outside world, meaning those who have no concept of the internality, and have no tools to understand that the internality of the king is what counts. Rather, they value the king only by what extends from the king to them, which is called “the externality of the king.” But they have no clue of the internality of the king, meaning the king himself and not what extends from the king outward.

Hence, these thoughts mock a person when he says, “Since I just spoke to the king, it does not matter if the king is granting my wish.” Rather, his only wish is the internality of the king, not what extends from him.

Therefore, if a person prays to the Creator and does not see that the Creator has given him something—since what matters to him is the internality of the king—he can be happy and rejoice in having been rewarded with speaking to the king. Yet, external thoughts within him wish to revoke that joy in him because they consider only the vessels of reception—what he has received from the king in his vessels of reception, while he tells them, “I am delighted and joyful, and I praise and thank the king simply for having given me the chance to speak with him. This is enough for me.”

Moreover, he says to his external ones, “Know that I want nothing from the king except to praise him and thank him. By this I adhere to the king because I want to bestow upon him by praising him. I have nothing else to give him. It follows that now I am considered ‘a servant of the Creator,’ and not ‘a servant of myself.’ For this reason, I cannot hear your telling me, ‘What have you gained?’”

“For example, all year long you engaged in Torah and in prayer, keeping all the Mitzvot[commandments], but you are still standing on the same degree as a year ago or two ago. Thus, why the joy that you praise the Creator and say, ‘This is my gain, that I spoke to the Creator many times, and what else do I need?’ In other words, if the king had given me something, I might have received it in order to receive. But now that I have nothing in my hand, I am happy and thank the Creator because my intention in the work was only to bestow.”

However, since in that state a person is telling the truth, he faces strong resistance from the external ones, who cannot tolerate one who is walking on the path of truth, if his only aim is to bestow. In that state, he has a great war, and they wish to shatter his joy. They make him think that the opposite is true—that what they are telling him is the path of truth, and that he is deceiving himself thinking that he is right.

In this world, a lie usually succeeds. For this reason, he needs great strengthening, and to tell them, “I am walking on the path of truth, and now I want to hear no criticism. If there is truth in your words, I ask that you will come to me with your complaints, to show me the truth, when I decide it is time for criticism. Only at that time will I be willing to listen to your views.”

It therefore follows that in order for one to have joy in the work of the Creator, all he needs is faith. In other words, when he believes in the greatness of the Creator, he does not need the King to give him anything. Simply being able to speak to the King is all he wants, meaning to speak to the Creator, as mentioned in the third discernment of giving praise.

If he pays more attention to praising the King, then high inspiration will come to him by itself because he does not want anything from the King. This is similar to the SefiraBina. It is known that at its end, Hochma does not wish to receive the light of Hochma, but Hochma wishes to bestow upon the Emanator as the Emanator bestows upon Hochma. And she wants equivalence of form.

In that state, the abundance, called “light of Hassadim,” after the Kli, comes by itself. This means that the receiver wishes to engage in Hesed [grace/mercy], hence the abundance is called “light of Hassadim” [plural of Hesed]. It is similar here. When a person wants nothing of the King except to bestow upon the King, and pays attention to what He thinks, an inspiration from above comes upon him by itself when he engages in singing and praising of the King, to the extent that he has prepared himself.

Now we can understand the matter of Moses and Israel singing and praising the King for the queen, and not the queen herself. It is known that everything we say about the upper worlds is only in relation to the souls, that Malchut is called “the collective soul of Israel” or “the assembly of Israel.” It is explained in The Study of the Ten Sefirot (Part 16), that the soul of Adam HaRishon came out from the interior of the worlds BeriaYetzira, and Assiya, from which he received NefeshRuachNeshama. And they all came out from Malchut de [of] Atzilut, called Shechina [Divinity]. And Zeir Anpin, who gives to the Malchut, is called “King.”

Since Malchut is the receiver for the souls, it follows that Malchut cannot receive abundance for the people of Israel because they are still unfit—having no vessels of bestowal. Otherwise, it will all go to the Sitra Achra [other side], who are called “dead,” since there is reception in order to receive in them, which is called “separation and remoteness from the Creator,” who is called “the Life of Lives.” This is why they are called “dead.”

In The Zohar, it is considered that a person must be concerned about the sorrow of the Shechina, meaning sorrow at not being able to receive abundance for her children, who are the people of Israel. She is called “the assembly of Israel” because she assembles within her the abundance that she should give to Israel. Therefore, when the people of Israel engage in equivalence of form, there is room for Malchut to receive the upper abundance from the King, who is called “the Giver,” ZA, so as to give to the people of Israel.

This is called “Malchut, who is called ‘the Queen,’ praising the King for the abundance she has received from Him.” Likewise, when she cannot receive abundance for Israel from the King, it is called “the sorrow of the Shechina.” And when she can receive abundance, she is called “The mother of the sons is happy,” and she praises the King.

Yet, all the sorrow and joy relate only to the whole of Israel. This is why The Zohar says that Moses and Israel say the song, meaning praise the king for the queen. It means that the reason why Moses and Israel praise the king is for the queen, which means that they have established themselves to praise the King, since what the King was to give to Moses and Israel was not for themselves, but for Malchut. In other words, they cannot tolerate the sorrow of the Shechina,which is why they engage in equivalence of form, so that Malchut can bestow. This is why it says, “Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.”

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

MĂREŢIA CUIVA DEPINDE DE MĂSURA ÎNCREDERII SALE ÎN VIITOR

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future

Article No. 09, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

It is written in The Zohar (BeShalach, Item 216): “‘Then shall Moses … sing.’ It should have said, ‘Sang.’ And it replies, ‘But this thing depends on the future, when he complemented for that time and complemented for the future, when Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future.’ ‘This singing’ is in female form [in Hebrew], but it should have said, ‘This song,’ in male form [in Hebrew]. And it replies, ‘This singing is that the queen praises the King.’ Rabbi Yehuda said, ‘Thus, if it is the singing of the queen to the King, why does it say, ‘Moses and the children of Israel’? After all, the queen should have been the one who is praising.’ It replies, ‘Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.’”

We should understand the answer that he gives about what is written in future tense, that it refers to the future. What does it come to teach us in the work? We should also understand about the answer he is giving, why it writes “singing” in female form, which interprets the intention to Malchut, meaning that Malchut is praising the King, about which Rabbi Yehuda asked. Thus, if he is referring to Malchut, why does it say, “Moses and the children of Israel”? For this reason, he must interpret that his intention is Moses and Israel, who know how to praise the King for the Malchut. We should also understand the meaning of Moses and Israel having to praise the King for the Malchut, and why they do not have to praise the King for themselves, but for Malchut.

It is known that Moses is called “the faithful shepherd.” Baal HaSulam interpreted that Moses was providing Israel with faith, and faith is called Malchut [kingship]. In other words, he instilled fear of heaven, called “kingdom of heaven,” into the people of Israel. This is why Moses is called “the faithful shepherd,” after the faith. It is written about it, “And they believed in the Lord and in his servant, Moses,” meaning for Moses instilling in them faith in the Creator.

It is known that one cannot live from negativity, but from positivity. This is so because “nourishment” refers to what a person receives and enjoys receiving. This comes to us from the purpose of creation, called “His desire to do good to His creations.” Therefore, a person must receive delight and pleasure so as to have something with which to delight one’s body. This is called “positivity,” meaning a filling. And with this filling, he satisfies his needs.

But a person also needs a lack. Otherwise, there is no place in which the light of life can enter. A lack is called “a Kli” [a vessel]. This means that if one has no Kelim [vessels], he cannot receive anything. A lack is called “a desire,” meaning that he has a desire for something and he feels that he is lacking this thing and wishes to satisfy the need. To the extent that he feels its absence and to the extent that he needs to satisfy his need, this is the measure of his lack. In other words, a great lack or a small lack depends on the measure of one’s sense of necessity to satisfy that need.

This means that if a person comes to feel that he is lacking something, and he feels that feeling in his every organ, yet he does not have a strong desire to satisfy his need, there are many reasons why he does not have such a great desire to satisfy his need.

  1. He told his friends what he needs, and he feels the necessity for it. However, the friends made him see that what he needs is unattainable. So his friends influenced him with their views that he must accept his situation. They weakened his strength to overcome so he can prevail over the obstacles on his way to obtaining what he wants. In consequence, the need and craving weakened, too, since he sees that he will never obtain what he wants. For this reason, meaning because he sees that it is utterly impossible that he will ever be able to satisfy his need, this is the reason why he does not obtain his goal—it causes him to lessen his lack. It turns out that his great desire has waned due to despair.
  2. Sometimes he does not even tell his friends what he wants; he only hears from friends speaking with each other. He hears that they have already given up, and that affects him, too. In other words, their despair affects him and he loses the enthusiasm that he had for achievingDvekut [adhesion] as soon as possible. Thus, he loses that willpower.
  3. Sometimes one thinks for himself without any slander from the outside, but sees that each time he wishes to draw near to Kedusha [holiness], when he begins to analyze, he realizes the opposite, that he is regressing instead of moving forward. And this causes him to lose his strength for the work.

It turns out that then he collapses under his load. He has nothing from which to receive sustenance because he sees only negativity and darkness. Thus, he loses the spirit of life that he had when he seemingly had some livelihood, called “sustaining his soul.” Now he feels spiritually dead, meaning he cannot make a single movement in the work, just as if he were actually dead.

This means that even though now he sees the truth, meaning the recognition of evil, it is negative, and from this, one cannot receive any livelihood, since provision of the body is specifically from positivity. Therefore, one must walk on the right line for two reasons: 1) to keep his desire from waning when he hears slander, 2) to receive vitality, which is specifically from positivity, meaning that it is positive, that there is a matter of wholeness here.

However, it is difficult to understand how, when he criticizes his work-order and sees that his being immersed in self-love is the truth, how can he be told to walk on the right line, which is called “wholeness”? After all, as far as he can see, when he judges honestly, it is a total lie.

It is known that general and particular are equal. This means that the individual follows the same order that applies to the collective. In regard to the collective, it was given to us to believe in the coming of the Messiah (in the prayer, “I Believe”), “I believe in the coming of the Messiah. And though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”

Hence, one must never give up and say, “I see that I cannot obtain Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator.” This is considered that he exits the exile among the nations of the world, called “self-love,” and comes under the authority of Kedusha [holiness], and comes to correct the root of his soul and cling to the Life of Lives.

It follows that if one believes in the general redemption, he should believe that redemption will come to him in particular. Hence, one should receive wholeness for himself with respect to the future, in a way that one should depict for himself the measure of goodness, pleasure, and joy that he will receive when all his needs are satisfied. This certainly gives him emotional satisfaction and energy to work to obtain this goal that he hopes to achieve.

It turns out that first one must depict for himself what he is hoping for—that it will make him happy and joyful if he obtains what he anticipates. However, first one should thoroughly know the goal he wants to obtain. If one does not pay close attention and much scrutiny to what he expects from his life, meaning that he should tell himself, “Now I have decided what I want, after analyzing the joy in life that can be obtained in the world.”

If he has the opportunity to obtain this, he will have the strength and wisdom to say, “Now I can thank the Creator for creating His world.” Now he can wholeheartedly say, “Blessed is He who said, ‘Let there be the world,’ since I feel the delight and pleasure, that it is truly worthwhile for me and for all creations to receive this delight and pleasure that I have now received from the purpose of creation, called ‘His desire to do good to His creations.’”

And although he is still far from obtaining the goal, if he nonetheless knows for certain from what he can receive his future happiness, it is as it is written (Avot, Chapter 6), “Rabbi Meir says, ‘Anyone who engages in Torah Lishma [for Her sake] is rewarded with a great many things. Moreover, the whole world is worthwhile for him. He is let into the secrets of the Torah and he becomes like an everlasting spring.’”

When he pays attention to this—to what he can achieve—meaning when he feels the importance of the goal and depicts for himself the happiness he will achieve, the joy that he will experience when he attains it are unimaginable.

Thus, to the extent that he believes in the importance of the goal, and to the extent that he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can receive the filling of the light of life from the future goal. It is known that there is inner light and there is surrounding light. Baal HaSulam interpreted “inner light” as referring to what one receives in the present, and “surrounding light” as the light that is destined to shine, but which one has not yet attained. However, the surrounding light shines, to an extent, in the present, to the extent of his confidence that he will attain it.

He said that this is like a person who bought merchandise from the market. Since many people brought this merchandise to the market, it had little value. All the merchants wanted to sell the merchandise at any price, but there were no buyers because everyone was afraid to buy, perhaps it might grow even cheaper.

Then one man bought all the merchandise for a very low price. When he came home and told them what happened in the market, they all laughed at him: “What did you do? Of course all the merchants wanted to sell all the merchandise they had in stock. This will only make everything cheaper, and as a result, you will lose all your money.”

But he insisted, saying, “Now I am happier than ever, since I will profit from this merchandise not as before, when I knew I could get twenty percent profit from the merchandise. Instead, I’ll make a five hundred percent profit. However, I will not sell it now. I will store it and I will take it to the market in three years, for by then this merchandise will not be found here in the country, and I will get the price that I want.”

It turns out that if he calculates how much he has earned in the present, meaning this year, then he has nothing. This is considered that he has nothing in the present with which to be happy.

This is an allegory about the inner light, which shines in the present. However, the surrounding light, called “light that shines specifically in the future,” shines in the present, too, to the extent of his belief that in the future he will receive the full reward he hopes for, and then his joy will be complete. Now he is receiving joy and high spirits from what he will receive in the future.

This explains the above allegory, that this merchant was ridiculed by everyone for buying the merchandise in the market precisely when it was irrelevant, when no one wanted to buy it. Yet, he bought it as something that others left because it was worthless, and now he is delighted because he is one hundred percent sure that in three years this merchandise will not be found anywhere and then he will get rich. And so, he enjoys in the present what will happen in the future.

It follows that to the extent that he believes that it will come to him—and does not despair about the future—as it is written, “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can enjoy in the present what will come in the future.

Thus, when a person is told that even though he walked on the left line—meaning criticized and saw that he was in utter baseness—and he sees this truth, since he does not wish to deceive himself and justify his thoughts and actions, but seeks the truth and does not care if the truth is bitter, yet he wishes to reach the goal for which he was born, but because of all this truth he cannot go on living, since it is impossible to live without pleasure, called “vitality” and “life.” To live, one needs light, which revives a person. By living, it is possible to work and to reach the goal. For this reason, he must then shift to the right line, called “wholeness.”

However, this wholeness—from which he now receives the liveliness that sustains his body—should be built on a basis of truth. This brings up the question, “How can he receive wholeness when he sees the truth, that he is in the lowest state, immersed in self-love from head to toe and without a spark of bestowal?”

To that he should say, “Everything I see is true.” However, it is so from the perspective of the inner light. This means that in the present, he is in lowliness and has nothing from which to receive joy and life. But from the perspective of the surrounding light, which is the future, he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”

It turns out that through the surrounding light that shines in relation to the future, he can draw it so it will shine in the present. And to the extent of the faith and confidence that he has in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, he can draw vitality and joy so it will shine in the present.

It follows that now that he is walking on the right line to receive wholeness, it is the real truth, since the surrounding light shines in the present. And besides, it is a path of truth, and since by believing in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, it is a great remedy that through the commandment of faith, the future will draw nearer to the present in him. This means that the surrounding light will be internal. This is considered that the light actually dresses in the present. It is called “the surrounding will become internal.”

Thus, from here—meaning from faith, from believing that in the end he will reach the goal, even though reason shows him each time that he is retreating from the goal and not advancing—he overcomes and goes above reason. And then faith itself accumulates each time in the form of “penny by penny joins into a great amount,” until he is rewarded with permanent whole faith, which is the attainment of the light of Hassadim in illumination of Hochma, as it is written in the Sulamcommentary.

Now we can understand what we asked about why The Zohar explains that this is why it is written, “Shall … sing,” in future tense. By that, it implies that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. What does that come to teach us in the work? In matters of work, we should know what we have now, in the present, and know what we must do. Thus, what can we learn about what the future holds?

As we explained, we must walk on the right line, which is wholeness, and receive vitality from it, because it is impossible to live from negativity. Hence, there is advice to feel wholeness from what will be in the future. This is the meaning of what the righteous call, “singing in the future.” In other words, now—in the present—they are singing about what they will receive in the future. This means that to the extent that they picture the delight and pleasure they will receive in the future, they can feel it in the present, provided they have faith that there is a future, meaning that in the future everyone will be corrected.

This is something one can already be thankful for in the present. To the extent that he feels it, this is the measure of the praise that he can give in the present. And besides receiving life in the present from positivity, he gains from the goal in general being important for him because he must picture for himself the delight and pleasure in store for the creatures to receive.

And each time he contemplates the matter, he gradually sees a bit more of what he can receive in the future, meaning what has been prepared for us by the purpose of creation. And although he sees that in his current state he is miles away from the goal, this depends on the measure of his faith in the goal, as in the example of the allegory above. This follows the rule, “All that is certain to be collected is deemed collected” (Yevamot 38).

With the above, we can understand what The Zohar explains—that the reason why it writes “Shall … sing,” in future tense, is to imply that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. This is so because we must know this, so we can receive joy and vitality in the present from what will be in the future. By this we can sing in the present as if now we were receiving all the delight and pleasure.

This is regarded as being able to receive illumination from a surrounding. In other words, the surrounding shines in the internal from afar, meaning that although a person is still far from obtaining the delight and pleasure, he can still draw illumination from the Surrounding Light also in the present.

Now we will explain what we asked about The Zohar explaining why he writes, “This singing” in female form [in Hebrew]. It is because Moses and Israel know how to properly praise the King for the queen. And we asked, “Why do Moses and Israel not praise the King for themselves?”

First, we must understand why we have to praise the King. In corporeality, we understand that a flesh and blood king needs honors, to be respected. He enjoys the praises that the people give him. But with regard to the Creator, why does He need us to praise Him and sing before Him chants and songs?

It is a known rule that everything we say in regard to the Creator is only by way of “By Your actions we know You.” However, there is no attainment in Him, Himself, whatsoever. Rather, all we speak of relates to the attainment of the lower ones.

This is the reason why one must praise and thank the Creator, for by this one can measure and assume the greatness and importance of the giving that the Creator has given him. To that extent, one can test how much importance and greatness of the King he feels.

The purpose of creation is to do good to His creations, meaning for the creatures to enjoy Him. And by the measure of the greatness of the Giver, there is meaning and pleasure in giving, that they give Him in order to delight. And when one tries to give thanks, he already has reason for considering and scrutinizing the giving: what he received and from whom he received, meaning the greatness of the giving and the greatness of the giver.

It follows that one’s gratitude should not be because the upper one will enjoy it, but so that the lower one will enjoy it. Otherwise, it is similar to the allegory that Baal HaSulam said about the verse, “Who has not taken My name in vain.”

He asked, “What does it mean that a person takes in vain? Does it mean that he was given a soul from above in vain?” He said that it is similar to a child being given a bag of gold coins. He is delighted about the coins because they look so nice and are lovely to look at. But the child is incapable of assessing the value of the gold coins.

From this we can understand that the gratitude and praise that we give to the Creator are only to benefit the creatures, meaning that we have something by which to praise the King. This means that when one tries to praise the Creator, this is the time when he is capable of feeling the importance of the gift and the importance of the giver of the gift. For this reason, what one should mind most is the praise that one gives to the King. This enables him to be given every time anew. Otherwise, if one cannot appreciate the King’s gift, one cannot be given anything because he falls under the definition of “Who is a fool? He who loses what he is given” (Hagigah 4a).

And what is the reason that a fool loses what he is given? This is simple: He is a fool. He does not appreciate the importance of the matter, so he does not pay attention to keeping the gift that he has been given. For this reason, the extent of the importance of the gift is his keeping of it. Thus, he can be in a state of constant ascension because it is evident that he does not lose what he is given, for he appreciates it.

It follows from the above that one may have many descents because he does not appreciate the gift of the King. In other words, he cannot appreciate the measure of importance of the nearing—that he has been given from above a desire and a thought that it is worthwhile to be a servant of the Creator.

And since he did not appreciate the importance of the matter, meaning the calling that he was given—to enter and serve the King—he might even corrupt, if he serves the King without knowing how to keep himself from blemishing something. In that state, a person is thrown back to a place of garbage and waste.

In that state, he sustains himself on the same waste that cats and dogs search to sustain themselves, and he, too, searches for provision for his body in that place. He does not see that he can find provision elsewhere. Meaning, during the descent, those things that he said were waste and unfit as food for humans—but are suitable as food only for animals—he himself chases that provision and has no desire for human food because he finds it completely tasteless.

For this reason, the stability of the states of ascent depends primarily on the importance of the matter. This is why it depends mainly on the praise and gratitude he gives to being accepted from above. This is so because the praises themselves that he gives to the Creator enhance His importance and esteem. This is why we are commanded to think very seriously about praising.

There are three discernments in regard to praising:

1. The measure of the giving. This means that the importance of the gift is according to the measure of praise and gratitude that one gives for the gift.

2. The greatness of the giver, meaning if the giver is an important person. For example, if the king gives a present to someone, the gift may be a very small thing but it will still be very important. In other words, the measure of the praise and gratitude does not take the greatness of the gift into account, but rather measures the greatness of the giver. Meaning, the same person might give to two people, but to one, the giver is more important and he recognizes the importance and greatness of the giver. Thus, he will be more grateful than the other, who does not recognize the importance of the giver to the same extent.

3. The greatness of the giver, regardless of whether he gives or not. Sometimes, the king is so important in the eyes of a person, that the person has a strong desire to merely speak to the king, but not because he wishes to speak to the king so the king will give him something. He doesn’t want anything, but his whole pleasure is in having the privilege of speaking to the king.

However, it is impolite to come to the king without some request, so he is searching for some request that the king may grant. In other words, he says that he wants to come to the king so the king will give him something, but in truth, he says that he wants the king to give him something only on the outside. In his heart, he does not want anything from the king. Just having the ability to speak to the king is enough for him and it does not matter to him if the king has given him something or not.

When people on the outside see that he did not receive a thing from the king, and look at him as he is walking out of the king’s house delighted and elated, they laugh at him. They tell him, “What a fool you are! How mindless are you? You can see for yourself that you are leaving as empty-handed as you came in. You walked into the king to ask for something of the king, yet you walked out empty-handed, so why the joy?”

We can understand this if while a person prays to the Creator to give him something, we can discern about it, 1) that one prays to the Creator to give him what he demands of the Creator. If He accepts his demand for the prayer to be granted, when he receives what he wants, he is willing to thank the Creator. And the extent of salvation that he received from the Creator is the extent of his joy, high spirits, praise, and gratitude. In other words, everything is measured by the degree of salvation he has received from the Creator.

2) The measure of the greatness of the Giver. In other words, to the extent that he believes in the greatness of the Creator, this is what determines for him what he receives from the Creator. That is, even though in the eyes of the receiver it is a small thing, he still received something from the Creator. Thus, he can already be happy and praise and thank the Creator, since it is the giver who is important to him, as in the above-mentioned allegory.

3) The greatness of the giver without giving. He, too, has great importance. In other words, the king is so important in his eyes that he does not want anything from the king, but will consider it great fortune if he can speak even a few words with the king. And the reason why he comes in with some request is only superficial, since one cannot come before the king without some request. Yet, he did not come for the king to grant his request. The reason he said he was asking for something was only for the external ones, who do not understand that speaking to the king is the most valuable giving, but the external ones do not understand it.

When we speak of a single body, we should say that “external ones” are the thoughts that come to a person from the outside world, meaning those who have no concept of the internality, and have no tools to understand that the internality of the king is what counts. Rather, they value the king only by what extends from the king to them, which is called “the externality of the king.” But they have no clue of the internality of the king, meaning the king himself and not what extends from the king outward.

Hence, these thoughts mock a person when he says, “Since I just spoke to the king, it does not matter if the king is granting my wish.” Rather, his only wish is the internality of the king, not what extends from him.

Therefore, if a person prays to the Creator and does not see that the Creator has given him something—since what matters to him is the internality of the king—he can be happy and rejoice in having been rewarded with speaking to the king. Yet, external thoughts within him wish to revoke that joy in him because they consider only the vessels of reception—what he has received from the king in his vessels of reception, while he tells them, “I am delighted and joyful, and I praise and thank the king simply for having given me the chance to speak with him. This is enough for me.”

Moreover, he says to his external ones, “Know that I want nothing from the king except to praise him and thank him. By this I adhere to the king because I want to bestow upon him by praising him. I have nothing else to give him. It follows that now I am considered ‘a servant of the Creator,’ and not ‘a servant of myself.’ For this reason, I cannot hear your telling me, ‘What have you gained?’”

“For example, all year long you engaged in Torah and in prayer, keeping all the Mitzvot[commandments], but you are still standing on the same degree as a year ago or two ago. Thus, why the joy that you praise the Creator and say, ‘This is my gain, that I spoke to the Creator many times, and what else do I need?’ In other words, if the king had given me something, I might have received it in order to receive. But now that I have nothing in my hand, I am happy and thank the Creator because my intention in the work was only to bestow.”

However, since in that state a person is telling the truth, he faces strong resistance from the external ones, who cannot tolerate one who is walking on the path of truth, if his only aim is to bestow. In that state, he has a great war, and they wish to shatter his joy. They make him think that the opposite is true—that what they are telling him is the path of truth, and that he is deceiving himself thinking that he is right.

In this world, a lie usually succeeds. For this reason, he needs great strengthening, and to tell them, “I am walking on the path of truth, and now I want to hear no criticism. If there is truth in your words, I ask that you will come to me with your complaints, to show me the truth, when I decide it is time for criticism. Only at that time will I be willing to listen to your views.”

It therefore follows that in order for one to have joy in the work of the Creator, all he needs is faith. In other words, when he believes in the greatness of the Creator, he does not need the King to give him anything. Simply being able to speak to the King is all he wants, meaning to speak to the Creator, as mentioned in the third discernment of giving praise.

If he pays more attention to praising the King, then high inspiration will come to him by itself because he does not want anything from the King. This is similar to the SefiraBina. It is known that at its end, Hochma does not wish to receive the light of Hochma, but Hochma wishes to bestow upon the Emanator as the Emanator bestows upon Hochma. And she wants equivalence of form.

In that state, the abundance, called “light of Hassadim,” after the Kli, comes by itself. This means that the receiver wishes to engage in Hesed [grace/mercy], hence the abundance is called “light of Hassadim” [plural of Hesed]. It is similar here. When a person wants nothing of the King except to bestow upon the King, and pays attention to what He thinks, an inspiration from above comes upon him by itself when he engages in singing and praising of the King, to the extent that he has prepared himself.

Now we can understand the matter of Moses and Israel singing and praising the King for the queen, and not the queen herself. It is known that everything we say about the upper worlds is only in relation to the souls, that Malchut is called “the collective soul of Israel” or “the assembly of Israel.” It is explained in The Study of the Ten Sefirot (Part 16), that the soul of Adam HaRishon came out from the interior of the worlds BeriaYetzira, and Assiya, from which he received NefeshRuachNeshama. And they all came out from Malchut de [of] Atzilut, called Shechina [Divinity]. And Zeir Anpin, who gives to the Malchut, is called “King.”

Since Malchut is the receiver for the souls, it follows that Malchut cannot receive abundance for the people of Israel because they are still unfit—having no vessels of bestowal. Otherwise, it will all go to the Sitra Achra [other side], who are called “dead,” since there is reception in order to receive in them, which is called “separation and remoteness from the Creator,” who is called “the Life of Lives.” This is why they are called “dead.”

In The Zohar, it is considered that a person must be concerned about the sorrow of the Shechina, meaning sorrow at not being able to receive abundance for her children, who are the people of Israel. She is called “the assembly of Israel” because she assembles within her the abundance that she should give to Israel. Therefore, when the people of Israel engage in equivalence of form, there is room for Malchut to receive the upper abundance from the King, who is called “the Giver,” ZA, so as to give to the people of Israel.

This is called “Malchut, who is called ‘the Queen,’ praising the King for the abundance she has received from Him.” Likewise, when she cannot receive abundance for Israel from the King, it is called “the sorrow of the Shechina.” And when she can receive abundance, she is called “The mother of the sons is happy,” and she praises the King.

Yet, all the sorrow and joy relate only to the whole of Israel. This is why The Zohar says that Moses and Israel say the song, meaning praise the king for the queen. It means that the reason why Moses and Israel praise the king is for the queen, which means that they have established themselves to praise the King, since what the King was to give to Moses and Israel was not for themselves, but for Malchut. In other words, they cannot tolerate the sorrow of the Shechina,which is why they engage in equivalence of form, so that Malchut can bestow. This is why it says, “Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.”

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

DIFERENŢA DINTRE MILĂ ŞI ADEVĂR ŞI FALSA MILĂ

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

The Difference between Mercy and Truth and Untrue Mercy

Article No. 08, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

It is written, “[Jacob] called his son , Joseph, …and deal with me Hesed [mercy] and truth.”

The interpreters ask, “Why did he call specifically Joseph and said to him, ‘Deal with me mercy and truth.’” RASHI interpreted about “mercy and truth”: Mercy that one does with the dead is true mercy, for he does not expect a reward in return.” RASHI interprets the verse: “I give you one portion more than your brothers,” “since you trouble yourself with my burial.”

RASHI’s words contradict what is written here. He explains “giving you one portion more than your brothers” that it is because he troubles himself with my burial. Thus, this is not true mercy, since he is paying him for his effort by giving him one portion more than his brothers. Concerning “true mercy,” RASHI interprets that he does not give him anything for his effort to bring him to the Land of Israel, as he says, “For the mercy that one does with the dead is that he does not expect a reward in return.”

Our sages said about the verse, “And he commanded Joseph saying, ‘Your father commanded before his death,’” that they changed the matter because of peace, since Jacob did not command this, for Joseph was not suspicious in his eyes. Although our sages’ interpretation answers the question that we did not find that Jacob commanded the above before his death, this can still be implied. That is, by intimation, he did command him prior to his demise, but not explicitly, actually telling him; this did not happen.

To understand the above, we must first repeat what we already said many times, namely what is the purpose of creation. We learned that it is to do good to His creations. However, in order not to have the bread of shame, it was set up so that by this the shame upon reception of the delight and pleasure would be cancelled. This matter is called “to aim in order to bestow” upon receiving the pleasure.

At that time, because the receiver does not intend for his own benefit, but rather, all that he receives is because he wishes to please the Creator, as this was His will, for He wants to do good, by this the shame was removed. For this reason, the lights departed from the Kelim [vessels] when the intention to bestow departs from them. In the upper Partzufim, this is called Hizdakchut of the Masach, and by this they have no Ohr Hozer [Reflected Light].

Ohr Hozer means that the lower one wants to return the joy to the upper one. This means that as the upper light comes to the lower one in order to do good to His creations, the lower one now returns the pleasure to the upper one. That is, the lower one wants to delight the upper one by receiving the abundance from the upper one.

Likewise, for this reason the Klipot [shells/peels] were born, whose quality is the will to receive only for themselves. The good and the bad that we feel in our world also extends from this reason. All the corruptions and corrections revolve only around this point called “desire to receive pleasure.”

If the vessel of reception remains as it emerged—receiving in order to receive—it would cause shame due to disparity of form. For this reason, there was the correction called “in order to bestow.” This matter, meaning turning the will to receive into working in order to bestow, is all the work that the lower ones have. In the upper worlds, this matter is called “departure of lights” or “expansion of lights.”

That is, the aim to bestow is what moves all the worlds. In other words, if the lower one has the power of bestowal, he receives the upper abundance. Moreover, the measure of the abundance that the lower one receives depends on the measure of bestowal that the lower one has.

We learned that the thicker one is, and the more he can overcome and give Ohr Hozer, the higher degree he receives. In other words, everything depends on the measure of bestowal that the lower one can give.

We already said that this will to receive is the only thing that is regarded as a new creation and is called a Kli [vessel], in which the upper abundance is poured. From this extends that the lower creatures should discern four discernments in their will to receive: 1) the general public, which follows the ambition to receive delight and pleasure because they want to please themselves, 2) those who do bestow delight and pleasure upon others.

However, in this, too, there are two discernments to make: 1) If they bestow delight and pleasure upon others but receive money for this, it is not regarded as bestowing upon others. Rather, it is called a “barter,” where each one trades what he has and the other one gives him what he has in return.

For example, a person who has a restaurant or a hotel and gives people a place to sleep or eat and drink. No one will say that this person engages in bestowal, since he receives money for his work. Moreover, he assesses the price—how much money he should take in return for what he gives.

Or, for example, waiters, who are serving guests. Although they are not receiving anything from the guests, still, no one will say that the waiters engage in bestowal because the hotel manager pays them for serving the guests.

2) When engaging in bestowal, as said above, meaning giving people food and drink and a place to sleep, but without any monetary reward. Only he knows that by trying to do good to others he is buying for himself a good name and the whole town will know that he is a person who should be respected because he is giving his energy and money for the needs of the collective. That person has acquired a reputation as a good person, a merciful, hospitable person, etc. And although he does this for respect, no one will say that the things he does are all for himself, meaning because he wants respect.

It is customary that if a person behaves in this way, meaning works for the sake of the collective, it is regarded that he is working for the sake of the collective not in order to receive reward. Indeed, everyone respects him for his righteousness and integrity.

This discernment in the work of the Creator is called “bestowing in order to receive.” This means that the first discernment is called “receiving in order to receive.” But this discernment, when he does not want money for his work, is called “bestowing, but in order to receive.” This is called Lo Lishma [not for Her sake]. That is, the act is bestowal, meaning that he gives of his strength and wealth for sacred purposes, but he wants a reward. This is why it is called “bestowing in order to receive,” and this is called the “second discernment.”

The third discernment is that he does not want any reward for the exertion he makes in strength and money. That is, he works in concealment between man and man, and between man and God, and he says to the Creator, “I am grateful to You for giving me the desire and craving to do something to please You. This is my entire reward in life—that I have been privileged with serving You. In return, I ask that You will give me the reward of more desire and craving to have no foreign thoughts to do something for myself. Rather, my only wish is to work for the sake of the Creator. I think that there is nothing more important in the world that a person can expect to be rewarded with in life, which will make him happy in the world. The whole world works for wealth; everybody wants to achieve it. But they do not know what happiness is.

“However, in this, everyone is equal—they want to be happy. And I do know what happiness is. If one can be rewarded with serving the King and not think of one’s own benefit, but of the benefit of the King, that person is the happiest in the world. How do I know this? Since this is what I feel. Well, what reward do I want? Only this.” This is why he says, “Lord, grant me man works for the sake of the Creator.” It is as our sages said (Avot, Chapter 4): The reward for a Mitzva [commandment]: Mitzva. For this reason, this is the reward that I expect. This discernment is called “bestowing in order to bestow,” and this is regarded as Lishma [for Her sake].

The fourth discernment is that he can already say, “I want to receive delight and pleasure not necessarily from bestowing. Rather, I want to receive delight and pleasure from actually receiving, since he has already achieved the degree of “bestowing in order to bestow” and is not concerned with his own benefit. For this reason, he begins to think, “What can I say that will please the Creator? After all, He does not need to be given anything because the whole world is His, as it is written, ‘and if he is right, what will he give You?’”

This thought makes him begin to think about the purpose of creation. He sees that it is written that the purpose of creation is to do good to His creations. That is, the Creator wants to impart upon the creatures delight and pleasure. For this reason, he says to the Creator, “Give me delight and pleasure. I do not want this because I want to delight myself. Rather, I want to delight myself because You enjoy our delight. It is only with this intention that I ask You to give me delight and pleasure. That is, I have no desire whatsoever to benefit myself. Rather, everything I think and do is only to please You.”

When a person wants to exit the state of “the general public,” which receives in order to receive, the order is that he enters the second state, called “bestowing in order to receive,” which is called Lo Lishma. This is so because the act is of bestowal, but he hopes to be rewarded by performing acts of bestowal.

In this, too, there are two discernments: 1) He wants people to reward him, so it seems as though he is doing good deeds, to the extent that people compel him by giving him respect and so forth. It follows that it seems as though he is observing Torah and Mitzvot [commandments] because people are commanding him to observe, and it is not the Creator who obligates. 2) He is working in concealment and does not want any reward from people. He does not show them the work that he does, and naturally, they are giving him nothing in return. Instead, he wants the Creator to pay him for observing Torah and Mitzvot.

Here there is a big difference between the state of Lo Lishma. In that state, the Creator is the one who commands to observe Torah and Mitzvot, and it is not people who compel him to observe Torah and Mitzvot. This is why that person is called a “servant of the Creator,” since all his work is only to observe the commandments of the Creator, which He has commanded us. However, he wants reward for his work, that the Creator will pay his reward and not people.

However, our sages said (Pesachim 50b), “One should always engage in Torah and Mitzvot, even if Lo Lishma, since from Lo Lishma we come to Lishma [for Her sake].” In the work Lo Lishma, by which a person wants to come to the degree of Lishma, in that state, this is where one needs extra caution and much understanding, and special guidance how to exit the state of Lo Lishma and arrive at Lishma.

This place is very complicated because one cannot scrutinize the truth, meaning which is true and which is false, as it is human nature not to see any faults in oneself because a person is close to himself. For this reason, he is biased, and “Bribery blinds the eyes of the wise.”

Moreover, even if he sees the truth—that he is marching on the wrong path and must change his way, meaning to come out of self-love—the Klipa [shell/peel] of Egypt controls the body. A person can come out of that control only with help from above, as our sages said, “Man’s inclination overcomes him every day, and were it not for the Creator’s help, he would not be able to overcome it.” Therefore, the work begins primarily in the second state, called Lo Lishma.

It therefore follows that the work with the body, when it resists and does not let one work, is primarily when one is working in concealment and does not expect any reward from people, but works only for the Creator. Because He has commanded us to observe Torah and Mitzvot, he wants to do His will, and this is his reason for observing Torah and Mitzvot.

The only thing he lacks is that he expects a reward for this. That is, he sees that he cannot work not in order to receive reward, but only if he promises to his body that it will receive some reward for its labor. To the extent that the body believes this—that it will receive reward—to that extent he can observe Torah and Mitzvot. But when he doubts the reward, he has no fuel for work.

In such a state, when a person yearns to be a servant of the Creator in order not to receive reward, the body protests with all its might and does not give him rest when he says to it: “I want to observe Torah and Mitzvot without any reward. I want to observe the Mitzva [commandment] of faith,” meaning believe in the greatness of the Creator although the body does not feel the greatness and importance of the Creator—that it is worthwhile to obey Him and observe His commandments in every detail.

“By this I am serving Him and I imagine that if the greatest in the generation were here to serve, and he would not let just anyone serve him but has chosen a handful of people, and I am among them, how happy would I be then? So why here, with serving the Creator, I cannot work without any reward and I expect to be given something in return for the service?”

This is so because there I see a person whom everyone respects and tell me how great he is. I can grasp the greatness that they say about him. In that case, I serve him because of his importance. But with the Creator, we need to believe in his greatness and importance, and especially, believe that He is good and does good, since the body does not want to believe but to see with its own eyes that this is so.

For this reason, sometimes one overcomes and has partial faith, meaning to give Him small portions. However, he does not have the strength to believe in whole faith, as it is written in the “Introduction to The Study of the Ten Sefirot” (Item 14).

Now we can understand why a person cannot advance in the work of bestowal. That is, where he does not see a reward for his work, he has no fuel and the body slacks in its work.

We should say that this is only for lack of faith. When a person knows this, meaning when he knows the reason that causes him to weaken it so he does not have the strength to work, there is hope that he will be able to correct himself in a way that he will be healthy and strong and will be able to go to work.

But when he does not know the real reason for his weakness, he could listen to several people advising him on how to become better. However, nothing will help him because each one tells him what they understand according to their views with respect to healing him. Temporarily, he receives a medicine from them and begins to think that they understand something, or he would not heed their advice.

Moreover, it is easier to believe that they know what they are saying because they themselves think that they are great experts, and the medicines they prescribe do not risk his life, of self-love.

For this reason, anyone who feels some weakness in the work goes to them. They give them medicines, which are pacifiers. That is, when one feels some pain in the work of the Creator, when he sees that he is far from the truth and does not want to deceive himself, for this reason he goes to seek some cure to heal his weakness in the work.

When he takes the medicines they give, it is real remedy for the time being. That is, the pains he had have gone away thanks to their cure, and now he is not in pain for not walking on the path of truth. That is, through the medicine that he received from them he no longer has a demand for the truth. It follows that the medicines that he received from them are pacifiers, meaning not to feel the pain.

This is similar to a person with a headache who takes painkillers. The pills do not cure him; they only calm his pain. It is likewise with our matter: All the counsels he receives from the advisors that belong to the general public cannot be counsels to perform acts of bestowal. They are merely painkillers but do not heal the illness, which is the main reason for his weakness.

But when he has learned the cause of the illness, meaning that the reason is only that he lacks faith, to believe in the greatness and importance of the Creator. The Zohar calls this “Shechina [Divinity] in the dust,” and our work is to raise the Shechina from the dust. This gives us a different order in the work of the Creator.

This means that one should know that there are actions and intentions, and we were given the observance of Torah and Mitzvot in word and in action. However, all of them, both Torah and Mitzvot, have an intention, too, meaning to aim what I want in return for observing Torah and Mitzvot, meaning what I must intend while observing Torah and Mitzvot.

Primarily, he should know for whose sake he must observe them. That is, it cannot be said of people in the general public that they should have intentions because they will come from Lo Lishma to Lishma, and the actions alone will do. For this reason, they cannot be obligated to keep intentions.

Rather, as they observe Torah and Mitzvot in action, which applies to Mitzvot dependent on words or actions, the intention is not important then, for even if they have no intention, but rather they aim that now they are observing what the Creator has commanded them to do, this is enough for them for Lo Lishma.

But when a person wants to achieve Lishma, meaning he wants to observe Torah and Mitzvot not in order to be rewarded, but rather wants to bring contentment to the Creator, to achieve this there is the matter of intention. That is, this Mitzva I am observing, with what intention am I doing this?

It is known that it is impossible to work without reward. Thus, how can it be said to a person that it is worthwhile to work not in order to receive reward? After all, he needs a reward. There is only one thing that can be said to him: He will be rewarded with serving the King, and there is no greater pleasure than serving the King. Then, according to the importance of the King, so he will enjoy. That is, the measurement of the pleasure from serving the King depends on the importance of the King, on the extent to which he appreciates Him.

But since the Shechina is in exile and in the dust, it is said in The Zohar that one should aim to raise the Shechina from the dust. Dust means lowliness, which a person tramples with his feet. This means that in every thing a person does in observing Torah and Mitzvot, he should intend that by this he will be rewarded with “raising the Shechina from the dust.” It means that he wants reward for his labor in Torah and Mitzvot, to feel that he is serving a great King.

That is, during the labor he feels that for spirituality, when he wants to work in order to bestow, at that time he tastes the taste of dust during his work. This is so because there is a great concealment on spirituality—that we neither see nor feel the importance of the matter. From this all the obstacles come to him.

But if the Creator were to remove the concealment from him and he would feel the importance of the King, this would be his entire reward that he wishes for himself in life. This is so because he wants to serve the King, as it is written that we say in the prayer, “And … came to Zion,” “Blessed is He our God, who has created us for His glory.”

A person wants to be able to thank the Creator for creating him for His glory, meaning to serve the Creator. This means that a person will agree with all of his organs, and that his “mouth and heart will be the same,” in that he gives thanks to the Creator for creating man in His glory and for not creating man for his own benefit, but that His will and yearning will be only to bestow contentment upon the Creator.

A person should have this intention in everything he does: Thanks to this deed he is doing, the Creator will give him the intention that all his actions will be only in order to bestow, that He will cancel his desire for self-love, since he sees that he cannot exit its control and is in exile among the “nations of the world” in his body.

It is known that The Zohar says that every person is a small world. It was also said that there are seventy nations in the world, as well as the people of Israel. Also, within each person there are the seventy nations, as well as Israel, and the Israel in him is in exile under the rule of the seventy nations within him.

This is as our sages said, “He who comes to purify is aided” (Shabbat 104b). We should interpret the word “comes.” We can say that “comes” is the act he is doing. He wants to do it Lishma but he cannot because he is in exile under the rule of the nations of the world. “Aided from above” means that the Creator redeems him from the exile among the nations who governed him.

It turns out that when a person performs an act, and wants the act to be Lishma, and not because of self-love, meaning to receive some reward for the act, namely a reward in this world or the next world. Primarily, he wants something for his action. However, he wants the Creator to give him complete satisfaction from the act he does and to feel that he is the happiest person in the world now, in that he is serving the King.

But if he receives anything else besides the service that he does, it blemishes the service for the King. The evidence of this is that he wants something more. But what he can demand is why he has no inspiration and true sensation when he is speaking to the King.

For example, he is asking the King that when he blesses for pleasures and says, “Blessed are You O Lord, who brings bread out of the earth,” why does he not have the manners to be standing with fear and trepidation as one stands before the King? Rather, he speaks to the Creator and has no emotion, no feeling with Whom he speaks.

This pains him. But since he is incapable of correcting himself, he asks the Creator to help him and give him some revelation, so he will feel before Whom he stands: before the King of Kings. So why does he not feel it?

It was said about it in The Zohar, “He who comes to purify is aided.” It asks, “With what?” and it replies, “With a holy soul.” That is, he is given abundance from above, called Neshama [soul], which helps him have the ability to come out of the governance of self-love and enter Kedusha [holiness], meaning that all of his thoughts will be only to bestow contentment upon the Creator.

Through the soul he obtains, the concealment and restriction are removed and he feels the greatness of the Creator. At that time, the body surrenders to the light of the Creator “as a candle before a torch,” and he feels that he has come out from enslavement to freedom. That is, while he wanted to work only for the Creator, the questions of the nations of the world in his body promptly came and asked, “How can you give up the existence of the body and have no thought at all in its favor, and instead devote all the efforts and the senses only to be able to find ways to bring contentment to the Creator?”

Their questions are even worse because a person does not think that these thoughts belong to the people of Israel, but that they are thoughts of the seventy nations. However, a person thinks that they are his thoughts, that he is asking himself these questions, and how can a person fight against himself?

Baal HaSulam said that one should know that these thoughts and desires are foreign to the Jewish spirit. They do not pertain to Israel itself, but rather come from thoughts of the general nations of the world, which enter the personal nations of the world that exist in every person. When one believes that this is so—that they are not his—then one can fight with another body. But when he thinks that these foreign thoughts are his own, a person cannot fight against himself.

Thus, there is no other way but to ask the Creator to help us come out of this bitter exile only with His help, as was said in The Zohar, that the help that comes from above is that he is given a soul. Through the soul, which shows the revelation of His greatness, only then does the body surrender.

By this we can interpret what is written about the exodus from Egypt (in the Passover Haggadah [story]): “And in all the gods of Egypt I will do judgments. I am the Lord; I am He, and not the messenger. I am the Lord; it is I and not another.”

This comes to say that only the Creator can help one out of one’s enslavement in the exile in Pharaoh King of Egypt, who is keeping him from exiting self-love and doing only works that benefit his self-love, and he has no way by which to do something for the sake of the Creator. At that time comes the Creator’s help.

However, Baal HaSulam said, “When can one say that he cannot do anything for the Creator? It is precisely when he has done everything he could. That is, he has already tried every advice in the world that he thought could help him, yet these counsels did not help him. This is when he can say wholeheartedly, “If the Creator does not help me, I am lost. As far as the work of the lower ones, in terms of what they can do, I have done everything and it did not help.”

It is like a person who had a sick man at home. What does he do? He goes to the doctor and says that the doctor will be a good messenger of the Creator and the sick will be well. But if the sick has not yet healed, normally, he goes to a professor. He says that he will certainly be a good messenger of the Creator and will heal the sick. If the professor also cannot help, they make a conference of professors, perhaps together, but consulting, they will be able to find a remedy for the sick.

But if that, too, does not help, then normally we say to the Creator: “Dear Lord, if You do not help me, no one can help me. We have been to all the great doctors, who are Your messengers, and none could help me. I have no one else to ask but You, that You will help me.” Then, when he is healed, he says that only the Creator Himself helped him and not a messenger.

This is what is written in the Passover Haggadah [story], that the exodus from Egypt was done by the Creator Himself and not by a messenger. It is as they said, “And in all the gods of Egypt I will do judgments. I am the Lord; I am He, and not the messenger. I am the Lord, and not another.”

In other words, when a person has done all the counsels and tactics, which are as messengers such as the above mentioned doctors, but they did not help, then a person can pray from the bottom of the heart because he has nowhere to turn to for help, as he has already done all the counsels he could think of.

This is the beginning of the matter of “the children of Israel sighed from the work, and they cried out, and their cry went up to God from the work.” We explained what it means that their cries were from the work. “From the work” means after they had done all that they could in the work that pertained to them, and saw that no help was coming from here after all the work, for this reason, their cry was from the bottom of the heart. That is, they saw that no messenger could help them but the Creator Himself, as it is written, “I am He, and not a messenger.” This is when they were redeemed and came out of Egypt.

By this we will understand what the holy ARI said, that prior to the exodus from Israel, the people of Israel were in forty-nine gates of Tuma’a [impurity], and then the King of Kings appeared to them and redeemed them. The question is, why did He wait until that time when they were in utter lowliness?

According to the above we should understand that when they saw their true, lowly state, that they have regressed and could not advance to the side of Kedusha, they understood that no messenger could help them, as with the allegory about the doctors. Then they cried out only to the Creator to help them. This is why it is written, “I am He, and not the messenger.”

The meaning of He Himself redeeming them and delivering them from exile means that they attained that there are no messengers in the world, but the Creator does everything. This is as it is written in The Zohar, “He who comes to purify is aided. It says, ‘With what is he aided? With a holy soul.’” That is, he receives the revelation of His Godliness, called Neshama. By this he attains his root, and then a person annuls as a candle before a torch, after he has obtained the Neshama, for then he feels that it is a part of God above.

Now we can understand what we asked, “Why did He call specifically to Joseph and not to the rest of his brothers to tell them as he said to Joseph: “Deal with me mercy and truth.” RASHI interprets that the mercy we do with the dead is true mercy, for he expects no reward.

Here there is a contradiction to the words of RASHI in that he interprets the verse, “And I give you one portion more than your brothers.” He said, “Because you toil with my burial.” This is perplexing with regard to what he says, that Jacob said to Joseph to deal with him true mercy, since he expects no reward. After all, he is paying him for the trouble by giving him one portion more than to his brothers.

Here is an intimation of the order of the work from beginning to end. Jacob commanded his son Joseph: 1) Deal true mercy. This is so because the beginning of the work is that we must achieve Lishma, which is called “bestowing in order to bestow,” and we demand no reward for the work. This is the meaning of what RASHI interprets, that the mercy we do with the dead is that he expects no reward; they only do mercy, meaning acts of bestowing in order to bestow without expecting a reward.

By this he wants to imply that it is because “The wicked in their lives are called dead” (Berachot 18b). Also, in the “Introduction of the Book of Zohar” he says why “The wicked in their lives are called dead.” It is because they are immersed in self-love, called “will to receive only for themselves.” By this they are separated from the Life of Lives, hence they are called “dead.” This is the discernment that we said is called “receiving in order to receive.”

And since man was created with a desire to receive that comes from the impure ABYA, as is written in the “Introduction to the Book of Zohar” (Item 11), therefore, one should try to deal true mercy with his body, which is called “dead.” In other words, he should guide it into performing acts of bestowal in order to bestow, which is called “true mercy” that he does with his body, which is called “dead.” It should come to the degree of performing acts of bestowal, and the dead will not expect any reward. When he achieves this degree, it is regarded as having attained the third degree, called “bestowing in order to bestow,” which is Lishma. This is the meaning of “He called his son Joseph and commanded him to deal with him true mercy.”

Afterwards comes the fourth degree, called “receiving in order to bestow.” That is, after he has come to the degree of Lishma in vessels of bestowal, he guides it that it should receive, except only what it has the strength to receive with the aim to bestow. This is what RASHI interprets about the verse, “I give you one portion more than to your brothers,” since you trouble yourself with my burial.” This shows wholeness, for afterwards he can receive in order to bestow.

This is the meaning of what we asked, why he called his son Joseph. It could be said that he wanted to imply to him what is written, “And He commanded Joseph saying, ‘Your father had commanded before his death.’” Our sages interpreted that we did not find that Jacob said this to him. They explained that the matter was changed because of peace.

We should say that by commanding Joseph to deal true mercy, the aim was that he would engage only in bestowal and not for his own sake. It therefore implies that he would have no hatred for the brothers, for one who marches on the path of bestowal and does not worry about self-love, it cannot be said that he hates those who hurt him.

Now we can understand the difference between true mercy, and untrue mercy. We explained that in the work, mercy that one does with the dead is called “true mercy” because he expects no reward. This means that a person performs acts of bestowal, meaning Torah and Mitzvot, and they are Mitzvot that are only from our sages [De Rabanan] or from the customs of Israel, which are generally called “620 Mitzvot,” which are called Keter, as explained in the book A Sage’s Fruit.

The body is called “dead” because it extends from the impure ABYA, hence it is called “wicked” and “dead,” for it is separated from the Life of Lives. We are told that the mercy he does with the body should be true, meaning that the intention will truly be as the act, meaning that the aim, too, will be to bestow. If the aim is not to bestow, this mercy is not regarded as true.

If this mercy is not true, it does not correct his dead, which was called “wicked” because of his will to receive, by which the body received two appellations: “wicked” and “dead.” In order to correct it, there should be a correction where it goes completely opposite from where it went thus far, as it was walking on the path of reception and not of bestowal.

It follows that if this mercy is not true mercy, but has a different intention from the act of mercy that he does, as a result, the body receives no fundamental correction. And although there is the matter of “from Lo Lishma we come to Lishma,” it is only by passing through, meaning that it is impossible to achieve true mercy before we pass through the first stage, called “untrue mercy.”

However, the most important is to come to the truth, that the mercy will be true mercy, and not only that on the outside we see that it is mercy, meaning what is revealed, but what is covered, namely the aim, we cannot see what a person has in his heart. Perhaps, within the heart, where there is the intention on the act, he has calculated that by the mercy that he does he will receive some reward, which is called “bestowing in order to receive.”

We can interpret this as was said, “Go humbly with the Lord your God.” “Go humbly” means that a person cannot see what the person thinks about the act, for the aim is concealed and the other does not know his friend’s thoughts. Then the writing says, “Go humbly.” That which is in your heart, try to make it be with the Lord your God, meaning to bestow, such as what is revealed. This is called “his mouth and heart are the same.”

For this reason, we should make two discernments: 1) untrue mercy, which is Lo Lishma, meaning bestowing in order to receive, 2) true mercy, which is Lishma, meaning bestowing in order to bestow.

Indeed, there is the main discernment, which is the purpose of creation—for the lower one to receive delight and pleasure, but with the aim to bestow. That discernment, too, is implied in what was said, “And deal with me mercy and truth,” meaning that this mercy will bring him to the truth. “Truth” means as it is written in The Study of the Ten Sefirot (Part 13, Item 17): “The seventh correction of the thirteen corrections of Dikna is ‘truth,’ called by the name ‘two holy apples,’ which are the two Panim [faces].”

He interprets there (in Ohr Pnimi) that when attaining the seventh correction, called “truth,” we see that His guidance with the creatures is indeed a guidance of good and doing good. That is, the guidance that was previously only in faith, now they have been rewarded with attainment and feeling that this is truly so. At that time they receive the good in the form of receiving in order to bestow. This is the purpose of creation—for the creatures to receive the delight and pleasure, for this realizes the purpose of creation.

Now we can interpret the verse “The Lord is near to all who call upon Him, to all who call upon Him in truth” in two ways, too.

1) “The Lord is near” means that He hears the prayer of all “who call upon Him in truth.” That is, they feel when they are exerting in acts of bestowal, yet see that they are far from the intention to bestow. This means that they see the truth—that there is a great distance between the act and the intention, that they cannot exit the intention of self-love. They pray to the Creator to deliver them from this enslavement, and this is all they want and crave. This is the only salvation they expect.

They believe that as long as one is in self-love, he is separated from the Life of Lives. The verse says about this: “The Lord is near to all who call upon Him.” The Lord will give them the truth, meaning that they will be able to deal true mercy and will not settle for dealing untrue mercy, meaning Lo Lishma. And since it is a prayer for the truth, the Creator helps them and they receive from him the quality of truth.

2) They want to be rewarded with the quality of truth, which is the seventh correction of the thirteen corrections of Dikna. Through this correction, He is revealed to the created beings and indeed everyone sees that the Creator leads His world with a guidance of good and doing good. This is called “revealed Hassadim [mercies],” when the Creator’s mercies are revealed to all—that they are true.

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

MIRACOLUL DE HANUKA

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

The Miracle of Hanukkah

Article No. 07, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

In the Hanukkah poem, we say, “Greeks,” etc., “and from the one remnant of the jars, a miracle was made for the roses. Sons of Bina [understanding], eight days, established song and chanting.” The interpreters ask, “Why did they make the days of Hanukkah eight?” After all, they had oil for one night, and the miracle was that it burned seven more days. Therefore, according to the miracle, they should have set it only for seven days.”

They explained that since there remained on the first night from the oil that was needed for the first night, so the miracle on the first night was that not all the oil burned, but rather some of the oil burned and the rest remained seven more days.

This means that their finding the oil jar that was sealed with the seal of the High Priest is not regarded as a miracle, although it was a miracle that the Greeks did not see the oil jar. Instead, he regards a miracle as that which was unnatural, and that which was done above nature is regarded as a miracle, since the oil jar was in the world but they did not see it.

This is not so with the oil. Of the measure required for lighting during one night, only a small part of the oil burned. That small part, which was blessed, burned longer. This was unnatural. That is, it is not according to nature to burn longer than predicted. It follows that what was left of the first night, the fact that not all the oil burned, this is called “a miracle,” since this did not exist in the world.

We should interpret in the work the meaning of the Greeks, the oil jar, and the eight days of Hanukkah—that they established specifically eight days. That is, what do the eight days imply? In other words, why was it not nine or ten days, but rather the miracle lasted only eight days? In the literal Torah, it is said in the name of Rokach that the reason why the miracle lasted only eight days and not longer was because the place of the olives, from which the oil is brought, was four days’ walk there, and four days’ walk back, thus eight days. This answers why the miracle did not last longer than eight days.

It is known that our work, in which we need to exert in every way, is only to achieve equivalence of form, called Dvekut [adhesion]. Only then is it possible to achieve the purpose of creation—to do good to His creations—meaning to revelation.

But before the creatures obtain the Kelim [vessels] of equivalence of form, the purpose of creation cannot be revealedto everyone. Rather, it is concealed and we must merely believe that it is with the intention to do good.

What was revealed to everyone contradicts the good, since each one always feels deficiency in his life, and always lives with grievances against the upper guidance. He finds it difficult to say that he is enjoying his life and say all day long, “Blessed is the Lord.” That is, I am grateful to You for dealing with me benevolently.

Instead, a person’s life is always full of lacks and pains. He always sees that there is no meaning to his life, when he begins to think about life’s purpose, namely the benefits he gains while suffering the war of life.

This means that only when he tastes some pleasure, the pleasure intoxicates him and he loses his mind and reason and forgets to think about life’s purpose. But when the pleasure in which he is immersed departs from him, for whatever reason, he immediately begins to ponder life’s purpose.

Only when one has nothing with which to nourish his body, meaning when he does not feel pleasure, he immediately begins to think about life’s purpose. That is, a person asks himself “What is the meaning of my life? For what purpose was I born in the world? Was creation made so there would be creatures that suffer torments and pains in the world?”

That state causes one to begin to contemplate life’s purpose—what is it and what is it for. This is regarded as a person raising his head from the currents of life, where all the creatures are, and they have no time to think about what they are. Rather, they go with the flow where the water goes. And there is no one who can see the end, meaning where the flow of life is leading.

Only he, because the lack of pleasure causes him to raise his head up in order to look at life’s purpose, at that time he sees and hears as though a clarion from above tells him that the world was created with the intention to do good to His creations. But in order to taste that benefit, he is told by books and authors that there are conditions in order to achieve that good, called “the purpose of creation.” The Creator demands that they first meet these conditions, or He will not want to give them the delight and pleasure.

However, it is not that He requires these conditions, meaning that the Creator’s demands of man are for the sake of the Creator, and if the creatures do not abide by these conditions He will not want to give to them. With flesh and blood, if we want the seller to give us something then the seller sets the conditions for the customer, which, if he meets them, the seller will agree to give, but the conditions are in favor of the seller.

Conversely, the Creator is not deficient or needs the lower ones to meet the conditions required of them, as it is written, “If he is right, what will he give you?” Rather, these conditions that the Creator sets before them are for man’s sake.

We can see that this is like a person telling his friend, “I want to give you much silver and gold, but you must meet one condition or you will not receive anything from me.” His friend asks: “What is it you require that I will give you so that you will give me the silver and gold?” So he tells him, “Bring me large and small sacks so you can fill them with silver and gold. But you must know that for my part, there are no limitations on how much you will take. Rather, the amount of silver and gold depends on your limits. That is, as many Kelim [vessels] as you will bring me I will fill, not more and not less, but exactly that. This is the condition I am setting before you. Certainly, there is no doubt that the conditions that his friend requires are not for the sake of the giver, but everything is for the sake of the receiver.

Here, in the work of the Creator, where one must meet the demands that the Creator demands, they are only for man’s sake. However, a person thinks that they are for the sake of the Creator. And since man was created with a will to receive, he cannot understand anything of what needs to be done unless he sees that it is to his own benefit. But here he is told that the Creator wants us to work for Him and not for our own benefit. For this reason, the body resists these works. This is our work—we must go against our nature. This is called “work.”

But when one works and feels the reward he is receiving from the work—that it is for his own sake—he does not feel that this is called “work,” meaning that he wants to be rid of the work, since this, too, exists in man’s nature: He does not want to eat the bread of shame because our root is not receiving or deficient.

For this reason, when one feels that he is receiving something without anything in return, there is the bread of shame there and he is ashamed to receive. Therefore, a person does not resent having to work. Rather, one can regret being paid less than he thinks he is worth.

It follows that if a person knows he will be rewarded for his work, this is not considered “work.” But in the work of the Creator, it is regarded as work because he is required to work without any reward, which is called “working not in order to receive reward.” This is not in our nature, which is why this is called “work.” This is why our body resists these works and always has grievances with the Creator for giving us such hard work that we must work against our nature.

Thus, what do we need in order to be able to work in order to bestow? It is one thing: If we believe that although we do not see it right away, since our bodies do not show us the truth, if we exert to believe that working in order to bestow is in our favor, since that we need these sacks, as said in the allegory, that the sacks we are preparing are all of our Kelim for reception of the delight and pleasure, it follows that all the work that is with the aim to bestow makes part of the Kli [vessel] that is fit to receive the abundance. Also, every effort joins into the complete amount until we have a complete Kli fit for reception of the light.

However, it is difficult to believe and tell ourselves that what He gives is our vessels of reception to receive in it the delight and pleasure that are in the purpose of creation to do good to His creations.

Accordingly, we can interpret the matter of the governance of the Greeks, which is the opposite of the way of Judaism. The matter of the Greeks is that we must go only within reason in both mind and heart. Naturally, when Israel wanted to go above reason and not consider what the outer mind necessitates, they could not.

This is called the war against the Greeks. This is when the real work begins, namely that the people of Israel wanted to mount the track that leads to Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator. This path is called “faith above reason.” The Greeks wanted to control the body so it will not relinquish anything unless the reason agrees to it. Once this prevailed, and once that prevailed, and this caused one to have ascents and descents.

This, the reason, is the reason and the cause. That is, once a person has decided that he must go with faith above reason, as a result, an awakening from above comes to him and he begins to feel a good taste in the work of the Creator. At that time, it is human nature, since he loves to rest, for this reason he says, “Thank God that now I do not have to work with myself and assume the work of the Creator in the form of faith. Rather, now I feel good and my reason agrees to take upon itself to engage in Torah and Mitzvot [commandments] since now I feel contentment.”

He accepts this awakening as a basis and a foundation for the work of the Creator. That is, the basis of the flavor that he feels now, on this he builds his entire Judaism. It therefore follows that now he is blemishing the faith and says, “It is a shame that this awakening did not come to me right away, when I began the work. Then, I would not have to go above reason, meaning against the view of the body. Rather, I would need to believe what is received from books and from authors—that we must assume the burden of the kingdom of heaven although the body disagrees that this is good for me, and to believe that only in this state, when the body disagrees, is the best way for me.”

In other words, he believes above reason that only the path of working with mind and heart is good for him, meaning that then he will find the happiness that the Creator has prepared for him. It is very hard to believe this. But now he does not need to believe that this is so. Rather, he feels that indeed, observing Torah and Mitzvot will bring him happiness, since he feels that this is so, and he does not need to believe it.

It turns out that this is the real reason that later causes his descent, since his foundation is built on pleasure rather than on bestowal. If he remains with this foundation, he will never achieve Dvekutwith the Creator because as long as he is on this path, everything will fall into the Klipot[shells/peels] of the will to receive for himself.

Baal HaSulam said that when a person receives feeling and reason from above, when the body, too, begins to say that it is worthwhile to engage in Torah and work, one should be careful and say that he does not take this feeling and reason as a basis and foundation, “as the reason why I have decided that now it is worthwhile to work, since the body agrees to this work because of the pleasure I am receiving.”

Instead, he should say, “Now I see that this path, which is above reason, is a true path, since I see that it has granted me with being favored in the eyes of the Creator, that He is bringing me closer. For this reason, now I am fond of the Kedusha [sanctity/holiness], as well, and I feel the importance of the Kedusha—that it is worthwhile to work only for the sake of the Creator. For this reason, what should I do now? Brace myself and walk only on this path called ‘faith above reason,’ for by this I will be rewarded with permanent Dvekut with the Creator.”

It thus follows that specifically by being granted some good taste in the work, from this they took support for the path of faith. It follows that the basis of the faith grows stronger through the delight and pleasure that he now feels in the work.

Now we will explain the miracle of Hanukkah, as well, that they defeated the Greeks, meaning that they were rewarded with faith and felt good taste in this work, and did not go and take the delight and pleasure as a basis and foundation for work within reason, which is regarded as Greeks. On the contrary, they said that being rewarded with good taste in the work is a testimony that the path of faith is the true path, unlike the view of the Greeks.

Had they gone by the way of the Greeks, meaning that delight and pleasure would henceforth be their basis and foundation, that this would be their support to sustain their work, they would immediately descend from their degree, as this is the main reason why a person suffers a descent from his state. This is to his benefit, so he will not fall into the Klipa [shell/peel] of the Greeks. It follows that this descent is a great correction. Otherwise, everything he adds would only build the Klipa of the Greeks.

Therefore, there are two ways when coming to that state called an “ascent”:

1) To say that now he is liberated from the burden of faith. That is, until now he suffered because each time he had to assume the burden of the kingdom of heaven, the body always resisted it.

For example, when one must rise before dawn to go to his regular lessons, as soon as he opens his eyes and wants to get up, the body promptly comes and asks, “But you are enjoying the rest, you are lying in bed, and you must give up this pleasure!”

This can be as is done in commerce. That is, we relinquish the pleasure of money in order to obtain something that will bring us a pleasure that we need more. In other words, we will receive greater pleasure than money.

It is known that the value of every pleasure is measured by the need. For example, a person loves rest, but relinquishes rest for money. A person loves money but relinquishes it in favor of eating and drinking, etc. A person loves to eat and drink, but sometimes he avoids it if he knows it is bad for his health. It follows that he has relinquished eating and drinking in order to obtain health.

For this reason, the body asks the person, when he wants to rise before dawn to serve the Creator, telling him: “What do you think you will gain now if you relinquish the rest?” When he tells it, “I want to gain the next world by observing the King’s commandment,” the body replies, “Fine, you can get up in the morning like all other people. Why are you rushing to rise sooner than others? You have the whole day to observe Torah and Mitzvot!”

At that time the person says to his body: “Know that there is the world in general, called ‘ordinary people,’ and there are people who do not go with the flow, but want to be exceptional. That is, they want to be rewarded with the goal for which they were created, which is called ‘Dvekut with the Creator,’ ‘Torah Lishma [for Her sake].’ Our sages said that we can be awarded this by learning Torah after midnight, as explained in The Zohar, and this is also accepted among those who want to obtain anything in their lives.”

At that time the body comes with strong arguments and says to him: “You’d be right if this were as you say, that you have a lofty goal in your life, and you want me to assist you in your role. But, you see how much work and efforts you have put into this work in order to come to work Lishma, and you see that you have not moved an inch, meaning to have more desire to work in bestowal. If you calculate honestly, you will see the opposite—that you regressed by ten degrees! That is, now you have a greater will to receive than before you began the work on bestowal. Therefore, you see that you are not exceptional. You are like everyone else! Therefore, it is better if you enjoy the rest of staying in bed, and don’t tell me nonsense, that you are better than everyone else.”

With these arguments, which are true arguments, meaning that reasonably speaking, he calculates and sees that it is one hundred percent correct and there is nothing to reply to it. At that time, he does not always manage to overcome with faith above reason and tell the body: “Although you are correct with your arguments and common sense dictates following your way, I will go above reason.”

This is a lot of work because at that time a person suffers bodily torments as the body pricks him with slandering the work above reason. For this reason, when some awakening comes to him and he begins to feel some flavor in Torah and Mitzvot, when he feels a little bit of an ascent, he says, “Thank God I don’t have to go by the path of faith above reason, but that reason, too, says it is worthwhile to observe Torah and Mitzvot.” And as soon as he blemishes faith, saying, “Now I am relieved from the burden of faith,” this is the reason that he soon suffers a descent from his state because he has blemished the faith.

2) The second way is to say, “Now I see that the real way is to go above reason and not take feeling delight and pleasure as a basis on which to take upon myself henceforth to engage in Torah and Mitzvot. Rather, I want to work without any basis of delight and pleasure, since the idea is to work in order to bring contentment to the Creator. Therefore, how can I rely on the basis of delight and pleasure to build my Judaism? Thus, what should I do when I feel good taste in the work?”

At that time he should say what Baal HaSulam said, that he can receive his good feeling not as a basis, but as a testimony. That is, he should say, “Now I see that the path of above reason is the real way by which the Creator wants to be served. And the evidence of this is that I see that He has brought me closer by removing His concealment from me and I have been granted feeling His kindness and mercy—that He wants to bestow delight and pleasure upon the creatures, for this is the purpose of creation.”

However, in order not to come to separation by receiving from Him delight and pleasure, since reception of pleasure is in disparity of form from Him, this is why He has made the Tzimtzum[restriction] and concealment. But when we go by faith above reason, the body has no contact, but to the contrary, the body resists the work above reason. But now that I have gone above reason, He has removed from me some of His concealment. Thus, henceforth I will grow stronger and walk only in the path of faith above reason.

By this he will not fall into the trap of self-reception, called “separation from Kedusha.” On the contrary, now he will begin to work more forcefully with mind and heart, and the Creator will not throw him once again into the bottomless pit called “receiving in order to receive.” Rather, he will remain in a state of ascent. Moreover, he will ascend to a degree of greater revelation because he is not blemishing the faith, which is the keeping that one will not fall into the vessels of reception.

It therefore follows that in a state of ascent he has two ways. But how can a person win and walk in the path of the people of Israel and not in the path of the Greeks, which let him see that within reason they will be greater servants because reason agrees with this path more than with the path of faith?

Baal HaSulam explained the quarrel between the herdsmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdsmen of Lot’s cattle (Genesis 13:7). He said that “cattle” means possessions. Abram’s possession was only faith. This is the meaning of the word Av-Ram [Abram (High Father)], meaning that the father in heaven is high, above reason. “Herdsmen” means that he was sustaining only the possession of his faith. That is, he always sought sustenance—how he could sustain the faith so it has power and might, and not fail in the reason.

This is not so with the herdsmen of Lot’s cattle. The Zohar says that Lot comes from the [Aramaic] word eltlatia, meaning “curse.” That is, the herdsmen of Lot’s cattle were sustaining the possession of knowing and receiving. From this there cannot come a blessing, only a curse, for it is the opposite of bestowal, while blessing is only where one engages in bestowal.

In other words, the Kelim with which we can receive the upper abundance are specifically Kelim that give. With these Kelim we can receive. But with Kelim that want to receive, the upper abundance cannot enter due to oppositeness of form. Now we can understand the two ways that a person has when he has received some ascent in spirituality.

Yet, with what can we decide toward the good, called “faith,” meaning to be in the state of “the herdsmen of Abram’s cattle”? Baal HaSulam said in the name of The Baal Shem Tov that when one can do two opposite things and he cannot decide between them, the advice is to choose that which demands of him more effort. This is what he should choose for himself, since where there is labor, where the body disagrees, this is certainly Kedusha. He should hurry and do this, and take upon himself to do. It follows that here, too, he has two ways: 1) the way of faith, 2) the way of knowledge.

He should choose for himself the way of faith since the body does not agree to this, as it is toward Kedusha, meaning toward the desire to bestow, while the body wants the exact opposite. Therefore, it turns out that what is the determining factor? It is that the body rejects and regards the matter is redundant and superfluous. That is, he has no need for this and does not know why it is required in the first place. For this reason, it always wants to get rid of this matter of faith.

It therefore follows that the miracle that happens to a person, that he can decide for the side of Kedusha, is not a matter of intellect. Rather, it is something that the body deems redundant, which is the labor. The body loathes it and regards the whole matter of labor as redundant. But precisely from this redundancy, meaning what a person leaves and does not want or crave, from here comes to him the miracle remaining in Kedusha.

This is the meaning of “From the one remnant of the jars, a miracle was made for the roses.” A jar is as it is written, that Rabbi Meir purified the vermin with one hundred and fifty flavors. It means that in every thing there are views both ways. With what can we scrutinize? It is with what remains, meaning with what the body deems redundant, what it regards as nothing. This is faith above reason, and only by this can we be saved from falling into the trap of the Klipot.

This is the meaning of the jar of oil that they found, which was sealed by the seal of the High Priest. A Kohen [priest] is called Hesed [mercy/grace]. “High” means Hesed that became Hochma, meaning abundance of Hassadim, called “Priest.” The priest is the quality of Hesed, and Hesed indicates faith above reason. This is the meaning of Abraham, the quality of Hesed, being the father of faith.

The Greeks cannot see faith because they see only through reason, and not above reason. Therefore, when they walked above reason, the Greeks could not govern them. This is the meaning of the Greeks not seeing the oil jar.

And concerning the miracle that it burned eight days, it is an indication that it illuminated the Hassadim in Bina. From Bina to Malchut there are eight Sefirot, but Hochma of Hochma did not illuminate. This is why they established it as eight days, since it illuminated only in eight, as it is written, “Sons of Bina [understanding], eight days, established song and chanting.”

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

IMPORTANŢA CREDINŢEI PREZENTĂ PERMANENT

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

The Importance of Faith that Is Always Present

Article No. 06, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

The Zohar asks (Vayetze, Item 75), “Rabbi Yehuda said, ‘Since the Creator promised him, ‘Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go,’ why did he not believe, but said, ‘If God is with me’? He replies, ‘Jacob said, ‘I dreamt a dream.’ And as for dreams, some are true and some are not true. If it comes true, I will know that the dream was true.’ This is why he said, ‘If God is with me,’ as I dreamt, and ‘Then the Lord shall be a God unto me.’’”

We need to understand the above question, as well as the answer, in the work, as far as it concerns us. Also, what is a dream and what is the promise that the Creator made, and what is the condition that Jacob said, “If God is with me then the Lord shall be a God unto me,” then he will keep the vow.

To explain all this in the work, we should begin with the purpose of creation, which the Creator created in order to do good to His creations. It is considered that the Creator promised to give the creatures abundance. We should certainly understand this, that He promised abundance to the creatures—it certainly means that He would give to people only the abundance suitable for people.

For example, we see what is good for cats: When they catch mice and eat them, this is their abundance. We cannot say that this abundance, which He gives to vermin and insects, He should give to people. The same applies to the speaking, called “human.” In them, too, there are those who know nothing more than what the still, vegetative, and animate know as good. Certainly, animals, for example, were given the abundance that is good for them. And should we give them other abundance, it would be bad because they do not have the Kelim [vessels] to feel any taste in it. It is likewise with the vegetative and with the still. That is, within the speaking we should discern the still, vegetative, and animate.

This is as it is written in the “Introduction to the Book of Zohar” (Item 33): “And you must know that any contentment of our Maker from bestowing upon His creatures depends on the extent to which the creatures feel that He is the giver, and the one who delights them. Then He takes great pleasure in them, as a father playing with his beloved son, to the degree that the son feels and recognizes the greatness and exaltedness of his father, and his father shows him all the treasures he has prepared for him.”

Accordingly, we can see that the purpose of creation of doing good to His creations is that they will achieve the revelation of Godliness. There was no intent for corporeal pleasures because all the corporeal pleasures from which the creatures are nourished before they obtain vessels of bestowal are only, as it is written in The Zohar, a frail light of sparks of Kedusha [holiness] that fell among the Klipot [shells/peels]. This is all of their vitality. But the primary delight and pleasure are clothed in Torah and Mitzvot [commandments/good deeds].

However, in order for the pleasure that the Creator wishes to impart upon the creatures to be complete, the correction of Tzimtzum [restriction] took place, namely the concealment on the delight and pleasure that exist in Torah and Mitzvot. (It is so that the world will exist, so they can receive the pleasure and enjoy, in the meantime, from the frail illumination that fell among the Klipot and on which the world feeds.)

Through the concealment there is room for man to accustom himself that everything he does will be for the Creator because he wants to serve the King without anything in return, since he is keeping Torah and Mitzvot without any appearance of light, which is called “the true delight and pleasure.”

Once he has become accustomed to keeping his intent only to bestow, then, when he receives the delight and pleasure, there will not be any bread of shame in it because he will not be receiving the delight and pleasure for his own benefit. For himself, he will be willing to give up the pleasures. But since he wants to please the Creator and sees that the Creator lacks only one thing—that He can carry out His goal, meaning that the creatures will receive from Him—for this reason he now receives the abundance, to please the Creator, for the Creator can receive only this from the lower ones: that they will receive from Him delight and pleasure. And since the Creator wants to delight the creatures, the creatures must delight the Creator, too. This is called “equivalence of form.”

However, it takes great labor to achieve equivalence of form, which means that all the actions are done for the Creator, since it is against nature. Since man is created with a will to receive pleasure for himself, called “will to receive for himself,” and a person is told that he must cancel this will to receive and acquire a new Kli [vessel], called “desire to bestow,” so not every person is rewarded with being able to acquire these Kelim, which are fit to contain the upper light.

In order for one to have a desire to bestow, our sages said (Kidushin 30), “I have created the evil inclination; I have created for it the spice of Torah.” Thus, precisely by the Torah he can achieve vessels of bestowal.

Also, there is a saying by our sages (Sukkah 52): “Rabbi Shimon Ben Levi said, ‘Man’s inclination overcomes him every day and seeks to put him to death, as it was said, ‘The wicked watches the righteous and seeks to put him to death.’ Were it not for the Creator’s help, he would not overcome it, as it was said, ‘The Lord will not leave him in its hand,’ referring to this will to receive, since it is separated from the Creator, as it is known that in spirituality, disparity of form separates the spiritual and divides it in two.’’”

It is explained in the “Introduction to the Book of Zohar” (Item 10) that “Indeed, first we must understand the meaning of the existence of Tuma’a [impurity] and Klipot. Know that this is the great will to receive, which we said, and which He placed (the will to receive) in the system of the impure worlds ABYA. Because of it, they have become separated from the Creator and from all the worlds of Kedusha [holiness]. For this reason, the Klipot are called ‘dead,’ as it is written, ‘sacrifices of the dead.’ And the wicked that follow them, as our sages said, ‘The wicked, in their lives, are called ‘dead,’’ since the will to receive imprinted in them in oppositeness of form to His Holiness separates them from the Life of Lives, and they are far from Him from one end to the other. It is so because He has no interest in reception, but only in bestowal, whereas the Klipot want none of bestowal, but only to receive for themselves, for their own delight, and there is no greater oppositeness than this.”

According to the above, in order for a person to have equivalence of form so he may receive the delight and pleasure from the Creator, one is required to great exertion and much help from above so he can defeat the evil in him, which is the will to receive, and to be able to use it with the aim to bestow. There are many people who are not rewarded with it, and for those who are rewarded with it, it is truly a miracle.

Now we should explain what we asked about what is written about Jacob, what it comes to teach us of the way of the Creator in that the Torah tells us his dream and the vow he made, and that the vow was on condition in that he said, “If God is with me.”

It is written, “And Jacob arose from his sleep… and took the stone he had placed under his head.” It is known that a stone is called Malchut, and Malchut is called “faith.” That is, when a person wants to understand, and understanding is called “head” [mind], he takes this understanding in his mind and places it under his head. This means that he places faith in the head and places his understanding and knowledge under his head. It follows that afterwards the order is that faith is above and reason is below.

This is called “faith above reason.” Accordingly, we can interpret what is written, “And he took one of the stones of the place and put it under his head.” It is written, “and [Jacob] set it up as a headstone,” meaning that he had made faith above reason his state. Matzeva [headstone] comes from the word Matzav [state], meaning that the state that he wants to build the structure of Kedushawill be in faith above reason. This is the meaning of the words, “Then Jacob made a vow, saying, ‘If God is with me… then the Lord will be a God unto me.’”

The Zohar asked about it: “Why did he not believe but said, “If God is with me”? It replies that Jacob said, “I dreamt a dream. And as for dreams, some are true and some are not true. If it comes true I will know that the dream was true.”

We should interpret the meaning of this world and the next world in the work. This world is like a dream. That is, however we solve it, so it exists. It is as our sages said (Berachot 55), “All the dreams follow the mouth,” as was said, “As he solved it for us, so it was.” In the literal meaning, this is difficult to understand that however people solve it, so it comes true. Accordingly, why should I torment myself over a bad dream? There is a simple advice: He can go to people who are his friends and they will certainly resolve the dream favorably, as our sages said, “All the dreams follow the mouth,” and there is no doubt that there are explanations in the literal.

We will interpret this in the work. The Creator created the world in order to do good to His creations. In order not to have shame in the delight and pleasure, man is in this world, which is a place of work where he can obtain vessels of bestowal by which to receive everything in order to bestow. By this there is no room for shame here because he is receiving everything because of a Mitzva[commandment].

This is the meaning of what The Zohar says, “The Creator promised Jacob abundance.” However, He spoke to him by way of a dream, meaning in this world, which is like a dream. That is, according to how a person solves it, meaning if a person goes according to the view of Torah (as it is written in Article No. 5, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin), it follows that he gives a good solution to what the Creator promised, in that He has created with the world with the intention to do good to His creations. But this promise is a dream, meaning that by a person solving the promise to do good, which is what the Creator wants to bestow, he will give the solution: As the Creator is the giver, likewise, man can work only in order to bestow.

This is regarded as the promise that the Creator promised, to do good, being if a person also provides the solution, namely to do good. This is as our sages said, “As He is merciful, so you are merciful.”

But if a person does not offer the solution to the dream, but what the Creator promised, which is to do good to His creations, and he wants the opposite, meaning he wants to receive in order to receive, it follows that he solves it negatively. That is, the good that the Creator wants to give cannot be upheld because he did not prepare the suitable Kelim for the delight and pleasure to able to enter them, meaning that there will not be separation between them, as it is known that disparity of form separates the spiritual in two.

Now we can understand why the dream follows the solution. The meaning is that the Creator’s promise to do good to His creations depends on man’s work in this world, where this world is like a dream, and everything depends on its solution, on how it is solved. That is, if the solution in this world is for the better, meaning if all of a person’s actions are to do good, meaning to bestow, then the promise that the Creator promised, to do good, will come true. If the solution follows the evil inclination then the dream, which is the work in this world—that the Creator will give the abundance—cannot come true.

Accordingly, we can understand what our sages said, “All the dreams follow the mouth.” It means that if a person speaks good things with his mouth, meaning that he always says that we should do good deeds, that everything is for the Creator and not for his own sake, then the good dream comes true. That is, he is rewarded, as our sages said (Berachot 17), with “You will see your world in your life, and your end in the life of the next world.”

But if his mouth solves badly and he says that he must care for his own benefit, it is a bad dream because he solved the dream negatively. It follows that the Creator gave His promise to give the delight and pleasure as a dream, meaning within this world, which is like a dream.

Now we can understand the condition and the vow, and the importance of the vow, what greatness there is in the vow, where he said, “If the Lord keeps everything that He has promised me,” what a great thing he will do then, as it is written, “This stone, which I have set up as a headstone, will be God’s house.”

Accordingly, the verse, “And he took from the stones of the place” means that he took the stones, meaning the understandings and concepts and views of the place, where each one has his own view. According to everyone’s understanding, he should walk in the path of the Creator only where the intellect dictates, and not go against reason, saying that this is why we were given reason—so we will understand what we are doing. However, he saw that although each one has a different intellect, he saw that the Creator, by creating the creatures with a nature of wanting to receive, there is really only one view here, namely self-love, except each one elicits his self-love with a special intellect. But they are equal in that they are only will to receive and nothing more. It is as it is written, “And he took the stone,” one stone.

That is, he placed reason, called “stone,” under his head, and took faith into his head, with reason being below faith. The vow was that “If God is with me,” meaning if he is rewarded with greeting the Shechina [Divinity], as it is written, “Then the Lord shall be a God unto me.” And still, I will not take this as the basis, but my whole structure of God’s house will be on faith above reason. This is the meaning of what is written, “This stone, which I have set up as a headstone, will be God’s house.”

Now we will understand the importance of the vow that he said, “If God helps me solve it positively,” meaning that he will acquire the appropriate vessels of bestowal where the upper abundance clothes, this is called “greeting the Shechina.” However, he still wants to use only the stone he had taken in the beginning and which he made into a headstone, meaning the stone that was below his head. And then the vow was that although he would be rewarded with “God is with me and the Lord shall be a God unto me,” that stone, which I have placed as a headstone, will be the house of God. That is, he wants to stay in faith even though he has all the revelations. It follows that faith applies both in Katnut [infancy/smallness] and in Gadlut [adulthood/greatness]. From here we see the importance of faith, for the vow was that even in Gadlut he would not move from faith.

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

CE ESTE MAI BENEFIC ÎN MUNCĂ DECÂT ÎN RĂSPLATĂ

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

What Is the Advantage in the Work More than in the Reward?

Article No. 05, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

RASHI interprets the verse, “And the Lord appeared to him”: “He opened the tent door to see if there were any passers by to let them into his house. At midday, the Creator took out the sun from its sheath, not to trouble him with guests. And since He saw him regretting that guests were not coming, He brought him angels in the similitude of people.”

We should understand 1) why he says, “And since He saw him regretting that guests were not coming, He brought him angels in the similitude of people.” Did the Creator not know in advance that he would regret not having guests? Thus, why did He take out the sun from its sheath? 2) Did the Creator have no other way to send him guests other than by deceit, meaning that he deceived him into thinking that they were people? After all, He could easily put the sun back in its sheath and people would be able to come to him as guests.

Our sages said (in the Midrash) that Abraham said, “Before I was circumcised, passers by would come to me. Now that I have been circumcised they are not coming to me.” The Creator said to him: “Before you were circumcised, uncircumcised would come to you. Now, I and My entourage come to you.”

This, too, is perplexing: 1) What is the answer to the question he asked, “Why are guests not coming now?” So He told him: “Before, uncircumcised would come to you. Now, I and My entourage.” But He did not reply why guests were not coming. 2) What is the question, “Why are they not coming?” It is simple: because it is midday. This is why guests cannot come. 3) In general, what is the reply that the Creator gave him, as if now you are in a greater and more important state than before, when uncircumcised would come? After all, our sages said, “Greeting guests is greater than greeting the Shechina [Divinity].” Accordingly, Abraham’s complaint is just, since Abraham understood that once he had circumcised himself, he must certainly reach a higher degree, but he sees that it is not so. Rather, he suffered a descent; he had lost a great thing, meaning greeting guests.

However, we should understand why greeting guests is greater than greeting the Shechina. Our sages said (Shavuot 35b), “Rav Yehuda said, ‘Rav said, ‘Greeting guests is greater than greeting the Shechina.’’” “Greater” means it is more important.

However, in the reality of this world we see that the important things in the world are only in a chosen few and not in ordinary people. It is only a handful of people. But things that are less valuable are found in more people than important things. Accordingly, the rule should have been that many people will be rewarded with greeting the Shechina, and a few with greeting guests.

However, in reality we see the opposite: There are more people who are greeting guests than people who have been rewarded with greeting the Shechina. It is so much so that we cannot even know how many there are in the world who have been rewarded with greeting the Shechina. Moreover, we must believe that there is such a thing in the world, that they have been rewarded with greeting the Shechina, although we do not know who they are. But our sages said (Sukkah 45), “There is not a generation without thirty-six righteous.” But who knows them?

Instead, we must believe that they exist in the world, and it was said about them that greeting guests is more important than greeting the Shechina. But according to reason, it should have been the opposite, as it is in reality, that important things are more difficult to find than things that are not so important.

Likewise, we should understand what our sages said (Berachot 8a), “He who enjoys his labor is greater than fear of heaven.” This implies that one who enjoys his labor has no fear of heaven. And if the intention is that one who enjoys his labor has fear of heaven, why is it so remarkable? Of course one who has fear of heaven—and in addition has the merit of enjoying his labor—is more important. However, we should say that the intention is that one who has only one thing—only labor—is more important than fear of heaven. We need to understand this, too, for it is contrary to reality.

We see that in reality, many people enjoy their labor. However, we do not see many people with fear of heaven. And if those who enjoy their labor were more important than those who have fear of heaven, there should have been many more people with fear of heaven, and people who enjoy their labor should have been a small part of the public.

To understand the above said, we will interpret this according to the work, as this path brings one to enter the King’s palace, and it is called “the path of Torah.” This pertains specifically to servants of the Creator and not to the view of landlords, as we have said in previous articles.

However, we should understand what is the work that He has given to man, and in which he must toil, as our sages said (Megillah 6b), “I labored and did not find, do not believe. I did not labor and found, do not believe. I labored and found, believe.” However, we should understand why we need this labor.

We should interpret once again what we said in the previous articles, that it is known that the purpose of creation was that the Creator created creation because of His desire to do good to His creations. It is as they said (Beresheet Rabbah, Chapter 8) concerning man’s creation: “The angels said to Him: ‘What is man that You remember him, and the son of man that You should visit him? Why do You need this trouble?’ The Creator said to them, ‘Then what are sheep and oxen for?’ What is this like? It is like a King who had a tower filled with great abundance, but no guests. What pleasure has the king that he has abundance? Promptly, they said to Him, ‘O Lord, our Lord, how great is Your name in all the earth! Do that which pleases You.’”

However, accordingly, why are the creatures not receiving the delight and pleasure that He wanted to give to the creatures? The answer is known—He has given us Torah and Mitzvot [commandments] so we will not have the bread of shame, for by observing Torah and Mitzvot we will be able to receive the delight and pleasure and we will not feel in it the bread of shame.

However, accordingly, this is perplexing, since there is a clear Mishnah [treatise] (Avot, Chapter 1, 3) that says as follows, “He would say, ‘Be not as slaves who are serving the rav in order to receive reward. Rather, be as slaves who are serving the rav in order not to receive reward.’” Thus, how is it permitted to labor and exert in Torah and Mitzvot so we can receive reward for the labor, for only in this way we will receive the delight and pleasure without shame?

According to what is explained in the “Introduction to the Study of the Ten Sefirot,” the meaning is that since we have been imprinted with a desire to receive pleasure, which is called “self-love,” and we have no understanding of love of others, but when we are told that we must do something for another our body promptly asks, “What will we get out of working for others?” For this reason, when we are told to observe Torah and Mitzvot, our body asks, “What is this work for you?” That is, what will we gain from this? We have to exert in Torah and Mitzvot for this. Therefore, it is told that by this it will be happy in this world and will also have the next world. That is, it is impossible to work without reward. It follows that we teach the general public to observe Torah and Mitzvot in order to receive reward; otherwise, no one will want to engage in Torah and Mitzvot.

Maimonides (Hilchot Teshuva, Chapter 10) writes, “Our sages said, ‘One should always engage in Torah, even if Lo Lishma [not for Her sake], since from Lo Lishma he will come to Lishma [for Her sake]. Therefore, when teaching little ones, women, and uneducated people, they are taught to work only out of fear and in order to receive reward. Until they gain knowledge and acquire much wisdom, they are taught that secret little-by-little and are accustomed to the matter calmly.’”

Thus, it is clear from the words of Maimonides that there is a difference between the general public and individuals. That is, it is possible to reveal the path of the Creator only to individuals, meaning the path to the Creator’s palace, meaning the way by which they can achieve Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator, as it is written, “And to cleave unto Him,” meaning that he achieves equivalence of form. This is the meaning of what our sages said, “As He is merciful, so you are merciful.”

This is the difference between the view of Torah and the view of landlords. The view of a landlord is that in everything he does, he knows that he must profit and receive all the profits into his own authority, meaning he feels that he has his own authority and that he controls his possessions.

Conversely, the view of Torah is that he has no authority of his own. It is as our sages said (Berachot63), “Rish Lakish said, ‘How do we know that words of Torah come true only in one who puts himself to death over it? It was said, ‘This is the Torah [law], should a man die in a tent.’’”

However, we should understand the words of our sages in what they said, “The Torah exists only in one who puts himself to death over it.”

1) Why do I need this death? Why should one put himself to death in order for the Torah to exist in him?

2) What is the measure of death that we need for this? It cannot be said that it is actual death, for it is written, “For they are our lives and the length of our days,” which is the opposite of death.

3) We also cannot say that needing much time to study Torah and to understand it is called “death.” After all, we see that even those who exert only in secular studies and not in holy words, but rather want to get a PhD in some science, they, too, sit day and night and study. And we also see that there are those who have already received their PhD, and still continue to study to become professors. Also, there are people who have already become professors but do not stop studying. They want to put all their energy and vigor into research and become world famous scientists. Still, it is not said about them that the wisdom does not exist in them, but that they must die, as our sages said that the Torah does not exist. This means that secular studies do not have such conditions. Thus, what is the meaning of “The Torah exists only in one who puts himself to death over it”? What is this death?

4) We should also understand what our sages said, “The Torah exists only…” what is this existence? If we interpret that existence means that he should know and remember what he has learned, that this is regarded as the Torah existing, should one put himself to death over this? It follows that one who was born talented, with an acute mind and perfect memory, memorizing everything that he has learned, there remains the question why he needs to put himself to death so the Torah will exist in him.

To understand the above, we should reiterate what we have begun to clarify regarding the purpose of creation, which is in order to benefit His creations. As he explains there (“Introduction to the Study of the Ten Sefirot”), since all the creatures are called “creatures” because something new was created here, which did not exist prior to the creation of the worlds, namely a lack and craving to receive delight and pleasure, since the measure of delight from the pleasure depends on the measure of craving and coveting of the matter, to that extent he can enjoy. Likewise, one who is not hungry cannot enjoy the meal he is given.

However, here, through the desire to receive pleasure that was imprinted in the creatures, it caused separation and disparity of form between the Creator and the creatures, and it is known that disparity of form separates into two in spirituality. To the extent of the difference between them, they also become remote from one another. For this reason, the creatures were separated from the Creator and became two authorities, where man says that he, too, is the host and not the guest, and has his own authority.

However, we should know that this will to receive is the evil that exists in the world, as is explained there (“Introduction to the Study of the Ten Sefirot”). That is, all the thefts, murders, and wars in the world, as well as all the bad qualities such as anger and pride derive from this will to receive, which wants with all its might to satisfy its self-love. Wherever it sees that it can derive pleasure, it is immediately ready and willing to be filled with it.

Even laziness, when a person does nothing, is also due to self-love. Now he chooses to do nothing because now he feels that the body craves to receive pleasure from rest. For this reason, he relinquishes other pleasures because at the moment, it sees and thinks that it will give him more pleasure than other things. That is, lazy means that he derives excessive pleasure from rest. However, all these fall into self-love, which is the evil from which the entire world suffers.

In order to correct this evil, which is called “evil inclination” and causes us separation, and for which we cannot receive the delight and pleasure that the Creator wants to give us, it is if we exit self-love and cancel our own authority, and our desire will be only to bestow contentment upon the Creator. This is called “cancelling the authority,” since we are not concerned with our own pleasure and contentment, but desire only to benefit the Creator and not ourselves.

At that time a person comes to feel with what he can delight the Creator. That is, what a person can say that will bring contentment to the Creator, since nothing is missing in the King’s palace. At that time a person finds one thing that he can say will bring contentment to the Creator, since the purpose of creation was to delight His creatures. For this reason, a person searches how to derive pleasure, in order to delight the Creator.

By wanting to give contentment to the Creator, he elicits a new thing: He really does enjoy. Otherwise, it is regarded as lying. That is, he makes room for the Creator to carry out His will, His desire for the creatures to enjoy. And if he does not enjoy and says that he is enjoying then he is lying to the Creator. In truth, he really does receive delight and pleasure, but the whole difference is in the intention, meaning that the pleasure he receives is because the Creator wants it. For himself, even though he desires and craves pleasures, he overcomes his desire, goes against it, and does not want to receive. This is called “receiving in order to bestow.”

By this we see that although in terms of the act they are the same, meaning that both enjoy, there is still a difference in the intention. One who enjoys because of self-love follows the counsel of the evil inclination, and one who, due to self-love, relinquishes the pleasure and enjoys because of the commandment of the Creator, that He desires to do good, and this is why he receives the pleasure, that person is regarded as following the counsel of the good inclination.

Similarly, we find in the words of our sages (Nazir 13): “Rabbah Bar Hana said, ‘Rabbi Yohanan said, ‘Why is it written, ‘For the ways of the Lord are straight, the righteous will walk and the transgressors will fail?’ There is an allegory of two people who were roasting their lambs. One did it for the purpose of Mitzva [commandment/good deed] and the other for crass eating. The one who ate it for a Mitzvais ‘the righteous will walk.’ The one who ate for crass eating is ‘the transgressors will fail.’ Rish Lakish said to him, ‘Do you call this one wicked? True, it is not a first rate Mitzva, but he did indeed perform the Pesach offering.’’’”

This means that there is a difference in the intention, although in the act, they are the same. Rish Lakish says “He is not regarded as wicked because in any case, he did perform a Mitzva, but it is not first rate.” We can interpret this that specifically concerning Mitzva we say that it is regarded as a Mitzva, but not a first rate one. This is why our sages said (Nazir 23b), “Rav Yehuda said, ‘Rav said, ‘One should always engage in Torah and Mitzvot even Lo Lishma [not for Her sake], because from Lo Lishma he will come to Lishma [for Her sake].’”

However, concerning permission, there is certainly a difference between receiving the pleasure because it is the commandment of the Creator, who wants to do good to His creations. Otherwise, meaning due to self-love, he would relinquish the pleasure. It follows that the main thing is the intention. But concerning a Mitzva, we say that even if he does not have the intention it is still considered a Mitzva. (It is as said above, that concerning the general public, they are taught to observe Torah and Mitzvot Lo Lishma, as Maimonides says.)

Accordingly, we should interpret the matter of a person having to put himself to death. We asked, “What is the meaning of death?” Now we will understand that death means annulment of one’s own authority. He says that there is no authority in the world but the Creator’s. This is called “singular authority.” This is the meaning of our saying, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one,” meaning that there is only one authority in the world, and he cancels his self-love.

By this we can interpret what the ARI says, that we must take upon ourselves devotion while saying the Shema Israel, that the intention is to annul self-love. Afterward, we can say, “And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might,” since his own reality does not exist with respect to himself because all this thoughts are for the Creator. This is called “putting himself to death over it.”

Now we can understand why the Torah exists only in one who puts himself to death over it. We asked, “What does it mean to observe the Torah, that without putting oneself to death over it the Torah cannot exist?” We should interpret that observing refers to what the Torah has promised us, meaning as it is written, “For they are our lives and the length of our days,” and as it is written, “They are more desirable than gold, than much fine gold, and sweeter than honey and the drippings of the honeycomb,” and other such promises that the Torah has promised us.

This is as was said above, that all those things are included in the purpose of creation, called “His desire to do good to His creations.” All this cannot come to the creatures for the above reason, which is the matter of disparity of form from the Creator, who desires to bestow, while the creatures want to receive into their own domain, which is called “separation” in spirituality, and from which derives the matter of the bread of shame.

Therefore, there must be concealment, meaning that the upper abundance included in the purpose of creation cannot shine. The reason is to give room for choice. It follows from this that we see in the world concealment of the face. This is what King David said (Psalms 73), “Behold, these wicked and those who are always at ease have obtained riches.”

However, when a person has already come to a state of “putting himself to death over it,” meaning that he puts his self to death, which is self-love, and he has no concern for himself but worries only about increasing the glory of heaven above, as it is written, “May His great name grow and be sanctified.” At that time, when one wants to bestow contentment upon the Creator, it is regarded as “and to cleave unto Him; as He is merciful, so you are merciful.” At that time we can be rewarded with all those things that the Torah has promised us; then they come true.

By this we can understand the words of our sages, who said, “The Torah exists only in one who puts himself to death over it.” It follows that the meaning of “The Torah exists only,” which He promised us, is only after he has put his self to death over it.

Now we will explain what we asked about what our sages said, “I labored and did not find.” We asked, “Why do I need this labor?” However, there is a famous question about this, since finding comes only when there is no preparation. That is, it just happened to a person that he found something, but without preparation. But here in the Torah there is a condition before the finding, that it takes great labor to obtain the find. Accordingly, it should have said, “I labored and acquired.”

Baal HaSulam interpreted that it means that if a person has labors in Torah first, he is rewarded with the Creator’s favor and the Creator gives him the Torah as a gift. This is the meaning of “I labored and found.”

By the above-said we can understand why the Creator does not want to give the Torah as a gift before a person has labored. And also, what is the labor? The answer is as it is said (“Introduction to the Study of the Ten Sefirot”), that since man was created with a will to receive for himself, he therefore becomes separated from the Creator. In order to adhere to the Creator he must be in equivalence of form, “As He is merciful, so you are merciful.” Otherwise, if he receives true pleasure from the Torah, he will be farther from the Creator.

Therefore, when one wants to come into a state where “All your actions are for the Creator,” the will to receive in the body resists it. This is the real labor that the creatures have because they must go against the nature with which they were born. It follows that the labor is that we need to go against nature. But why do we need the labor? It is in order to come to “and to cleave unto Him,” so there will be one authority.

It follows that we should discern between the general public and individuals. That is, the general public is taught and educated to work Lo Lishma, which is in order to receive reward. They are called “servants who serve the rav in order to receive reward.”

But the individuals are told, “Be as servants who are serving the rav not in order to receive reward, and let the fear of heaven be upon you.” The Zohar interprets (“Introduction of the Book of Zohar,” Item 191), “Fear, which is the most important, is that one should fear one’s Master because He is great and ruling.” It teaches us that “There are three manners in the fear of God, only one of which is considered real fear: 1) Fear of the Creator and keeping His Mitzvot so his sons may live and he will be kept from bodily punishment or a punishment to one’s money. This is a fear of punishments in this world. 2) When fearing punishments of Hell, as well.

“Those two are not real fear, for he does not keep the fear because of the commandment of the Creator, but because of his own benefit. It follows that his own benefit is the root, and fear is a derived branch of his own benefit.

“3) Rather, the fear that is the most important is for one to fear one’s Master because He is great,” because He is the root.

It therefore follows that the labor applies primarily to people who wish to go by the path of individuals, which is the view of Torah, which is about annulment of plural authority, and want there to be only one authority.

That is, the general public, as said in the words of The Zohar, want the reward of both this world and the next world. But individuals, who annul their authorities and care only about delighting the Creator, their whole intention is the work and the labor, and not the reward, for they want to serve the rav not in order to receive reward. It follows that neither this world nor the next world matter to them; their sole desire is the work.

When they are craving work, they are certain that they are not deceiving themselves that they are working for the Creator. But the minute they are looking at the reward, although he can say that he aims for the Creator, who knows if this is really so? Therefore, the only precious thing they have is room for work in order not to receive reward at all.

According to the above, we can understand the words of our sages, who said in the Midrash that Abraham said, “‘Before I was circumcised, passers by would come to me. Now that I have been circumcised they are not coming to me.’ The Creator said to him: ‘Before you were circumcised, uncircumcised would come to you. Now, I and My entourage come to you.’”

We asked, What is the answer to his question why he cannot keep the Mitzva of greeting guests? The answer is that now he has a higher degree, which is greeting the Shechina [Divinity]. This is why He said to him: “Now, I and My entourage come to you.”

But previously he had a higher degree, which is greeting guests, and hospitality is greater than greeting the Shechina. Thus, what is the Creator’s answer?

However, we should understand this, too. This is the opposite of common sense, since normally, it is a great privilege to people if an important person comes to them. According to the person’s importance, so is the value of the preparation to greet him, such as if the greatest man in his town should come to him, or the greatest in the country, or the greatest in the world.

But here we are saying that he was rewarded with greeting the Shechina, which is something that cannot even be evaluated. We cannot even know what it means to greet the Shechina, as is explained in all the books, that a person cannot attain it unless he has been granted with it. And who is granted with it, certainly the greatest righteous in the generation. And we cannot even attain who are those righteous, unless by faith, when we believe that there are such people. It was said about this that greeting guests is greater than this.

Certainly, there are answers to this in the literal meaning, but we will interpret this in the work. There is the matter of labor in the Torah and knowing the Torah. Labor in the Torah is that since man wants to serve the Creator not in order to receive reward, he looks only at the labor. If he begins to think about knowing the Torah it will seem like he is expecting a reward, for we must believe that no reward is greater than knowing the Torah, as it is written in The Zohar, “For the whole of the Torah is the names of the Creator.” Also, a complete man is one who has been rewarded with “The Torah and the Creator and Israel are one.” Therefore, indeed, greeting the Shechina is very important because the purpose is for man to achieve this degree.

But to come to greet the Shechina requires prior preparation, for one to be fit for it. In the words of our sages, this is called “As He is merciful, so you are merciful.” This is the interpretation of the verse, “and to cleave unto Him, cleave unto His attributes.” It means, as explained in the book Matan Torah [The Giving of the Torah], that only by a person working in love of others can he achieve Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator. There are many names to this: “Instilling of the Shechina,” “attainment the Torah,” “greeting the Shechina,” etc.

The main preparation, which is called “labor,” is that one must prepare oneself to annul one’s authority, meaning one’s self. We can call this hospitality [greeting guests], meaning that he cancels the view of landlords and craves the view of Torah, which is called “annulling of authority.” Naturally, he becomes the guest of the Creator, who is the Host of the entire world.

And since there are ups and downs about it, meaning that many times the body makes him see that he, too, is a host, meaning that he is allowed to do what he wants and he is not subjugated to the Host, who is the Creator. Naturally, he wants to do whatever he wants. But later, a person overcomes the body’s thoughts and desires and accepts that he is the guest and the Creator is the Host, and a person has no authority; he is only a passing guest in this world.

This matter, namely these ascents and descents, repeat themselves. It follows that from time to time a person always lets guests into his body. That is, a person always walks around with thoughts that he is the guest. We can call this “greeting guests,” where each time he lets into his body thoughts of guests. However, this is a great labor because it is against the body’s nature.

Afterward, he is rewarded with the reward called “greeting the Shechina.” For this reason, in order for one not to deceive himself that he is not concerned about the reward, called “in order to receive reward,” but wants to work not in order to receive reward, for this reason a person’s greatness is seen if he says, “greeting guests is greater than greeting the Shechina.” Then, a clear awareness is carved and becomes evident in a person that he is not looking at the reward, but at the work and labor, that he has something with which to serve the Creator, and this is all he wants.

We can understand it through an allegory: Two men who were great friends loved each other dearly. Once, one of them needed 5,000 dollars urgently. He said to his friend: “I need a big favor from you, to lend me this sum, and I know that you don’t have that kind of money, but I know that you have relatives and friends, and you can borrow from twenty people—from each one $250 dollars, and then you will have the money I need. In two weeks, God willing, I’ll pay you back.”

That person did not know what to do. Now he had to go to twenty people to borrow money from them with the promise he would pay them back in two weeks. “What if he does not have the money to pay back in time as he has promised me? What will I do? How will I be able to look in their faces, since I did not keep my promise to them?”

Afterward, he thinks differently: “He is my friends and certainly loves me, for if he did not know for certain that he will be able to pay back in time he would not make me feel bad.” After that he gets another thought: “It’s true that he would not ask for the loan if he did not know for certain that he would have the money to give me, but perhaps he made a mistake, meaning that the places from which the thought he would get this sum, his calculation was not very accurate, so what will happen if he does not pay me in time?” Subsequently, another thought comes to him: “Since he loves me as much as I love him, I have to say that he has thought several times before asking me for the loan.” These thoughts continue back and forth.

In the end he decides above reason, meaning although his reason leaves him in doubt if he will meet the payback time, but he goes with faith above reason and tells himself: “Since we have love of friends, I want to do my friend a favor, for by this I can show the love I have for him.”

But when he gave him the $5,000 dollars, his friend took out of his pocket two checks that he had to receive from the government, one to be paid in a week, and the other in two weeks. In that state, the person faced a dilemma:

1) He tells his friend, “Why didn’t you show me the two checks when you asked me for the loan? Only now that I have brought you the money you are showing me?” The friend asks, “What is the difference?” So he tells him, “I haven’t been able to sleep for two nights thinking what will I do if you cannot pay back in time? Now it is as though a load has been taken off my back because now I’m sure I can be a decent person in the eyes of those twenty people from whom I borrowed.”

2) He tells him: “Why did you show me these checks? If you hadn’t shown them to me now, I would have two whole weeks to work on love of friends above reason, and I would have a great gain in love of friends, which I regard as a great thing. By showing me the checks now, it’s as though you have robbed me of work.”

By the above allegory we can understand the words of the Midrash, that after Abraham was rewarded with making a covenant with the Creator, as it is written, “And made the covenant with Him,” he was rewarded with greeting the Shechina, and then he was rewarded with permanent faith in the Creator, without ascents and descents. He saw the reward for his work and felt that now he could not labor. He thought that now all his work was in order to receive, which is self-love, and longed for work, since here he could know for certain that his intention was not to receive reward, but that he wants to work not in order to receive reward. But now, after he was circumcised, he has no ascents or descents and no room for overcoming in the work.

Therefore, he complained to the Creator and said to Him: “Before I was circumcised, passers by would come to me.” That is, previously, I saw that I was transgressing the words of Torah and not keeping them as one should keep the law of the Creator, but then I overcame. “Returning” [“passers by” is written in Hebrew as passing and returning] means that I have repented. Afterward, they pass by again, meaning that I had another descent from my state. Subsequently, I overcame my state and repented, which is called “returning,” and so on and so forth.

It follows that I feel that I am doing something for You. But now that I have been circumcised and rewarded with making a covenant with You, I am not doing anything for You, but I long to do some service for You, so I will be able to say that it is not in order to receive reward. But this has vanished from me. This means that Abraham had a just argument.

However, the Creator replied to him: “Before you were circumcised, uncircumcised would come to you.” Nonetheless, you were uncircumcised. Even though you had some ascents in the work, you were still uncircumcised. But now you have been rewarded with greeting the Shechina. This is why the Creator said to him: “Now, I and My entourage come to you. So why are you angry at Me?”

Now we should know the truth, meaning whose argument is more truthful. The answer is that both are true, as said in the allegory. That is, the lender, after the borrower showed him the two $5,000 checks, since the borrower did not want his friend to be tormented by the possibility that he might not be able to pay him in time.

And the lender is angry at his friend because he had lost room for work. That is, had his friend not shown him from where he could pay, he would have work the whole two weeks—working in himself that he needs to adhere to love of friends and believe in my friend that he thought several times before asking me something, so that it would not pain me in any way. At the same time, the body always brings him evidence to the contrary, since it wants to install in my heart hatred of friends. Naturally, I would have ascents and descents. But then I would enjoy working with myself.

But now, by wanting to do me a favor, I lost. We see from this allegory that both are correct. That is, by each one claiming that he wanted to show his love, the love is established forever.

It is the same here: The Creator showed Abraham the love by coming to him by making the covenant between them, as it is written, “And made the covenant with him.” Likewise, by complaining to the Creator, Abraham showed his love for Him, that he wanted to serve Him not in order to receive reward, and that this is why Abraham longed for work called “hospitality,” as we explained concerning greeting guests.

Now we will clarify what we asked about what RASHI interpreted, “At midday, the Creator brought out the sun from its sheath, not to trouble him with guests. And since He saw him regretting that guests were not coming, He brought him angels in the similitude of people.” We asked, “Did the Creator not know that he would regret not having guests? If so, why did He take the sun out from its sheath?” We also asked, “Why did He have to send him angels in the similitude of people, for it seems as though there is deception here? He could have simply put the sun back in its sheath, so people could be able to come to Him.”

We should understand the meaning of taking the sun out from its sheath in the work. The light of the Creator is called “day” or “sun.” A “sheath” is like the sheath that covers a sword. When he wants to say that the light of the Creator is covered, he says that the sun is covered in the sheath and is unfelt.

During the work, meaning before a person exits his self-love, he must work in concealment. That is, although he still does not feel any taste in Torah or prayer, he should exert in Torah and prayer, and not say, “When I feel the taste of Torah and prayer I will pray and study.” Rather, if a person does not think of himself, but wants to serve the King, then he does not care what taste he feels. Instead, he should say, “Now I am keeping the commandment of the Creator and I want to bring Him contentment by keeping His commandments, and not consider myself, but only consider what will bring the Creator more contentment.”

However, when the Creator sees that he is already fit to receive everything in order to bestow, a person is rewarded with the revelation of the face of the Creator. This is called “taking the sun out from its sheath,” when the concealment of the face of the Creator is removed from him, and instead His face becomes revealed.

It is as our sages said (Avot, Chapter 6), “Rabbi Meir says, ‘Anyone who engages in Torah Lishma is rewarded with many things and the secrets of Torah are revealed to him.’” This means that if he engages Lishma, meaning not for his own benefit, but his intention in keeping the Torah and Mitzvotis only for the Creator, by this he becomes fit to receive the abundance because there is equivalence of form here, called Dvekut, meaning that as the Creator wants to bestow upon the creatures, man wants to bestow upon the Creator.

At that time, the concealment is removed from his place because the concealment was only due to the correction of the bread of shame. But now that he has come to a degree where he wants to bestow, there is no more room for shame because everything he receives now is not for his own benefit, but because the Creator wants it. Thus, naturally, he is rewarded with greeting the Shechina. This is called “taking the sun out from its sheath,” meaning taking out the upper abundance from the concealment it had been in until now.

According to the above, there is no room for asking why the Creator took the sun out from its sheath if the Creator knew in advance that Abraham would regret not having guests, called “passers by,” meaning ascents and descents, since He did not place the sun in its sheath. That is, He made the concealment only so that man could come to aim to bestow upon the Creator.

That is, even though he does not see any reward in this work he is doing, to achieve Torah Lishma, and not to receive reward, but now that Abraham has achieved this there is certainly no room for concealment. Instead, the concealment is removed from the place that belongs to the Creator, as it is written, “In every place where I mention My name, I will come to you and bless you” (Exodus 20:21).

The question is about “where I mention.” It should have said that if a person mentions the name of the Creator, “I will come to you and bless you.” What is, “I will mention”? It means that the Creator will mention His own name.

We should interpret that if a person annuls himself as we explained about the view of Torah, meaning follows “puts himself to death over it,” which is annulment of the authority so there is only the singular authority here—that of the Creator—then the Creator can say, “In every place where I mention.” Why can I mention My name? It is because man has canceled that place for the Creator. At that time, “I will come to you and bless you” comes true. For this reason, he comes to a state where the Creator took the sun out from its sheath, which is the greeting of the Shechina.

Naturally, there is no room here for the question about the Creator saw that he regretted, He placed the sun back in its sheath, since this contradicts the goal. The purpose of creation is as is written, “And let them make Me a Temple that I may dwell among them,” and not depart. As long as there is a place of equivalence of form, meaning a desire to bestow, the Creator, too, brings Himself to that place. Only in a place of sin—when falling to the vessels of reception in order to receive due to some sin—the abundance departs due to the iniquities. This is called “the ruin of the Temple.”

This is why He could not give him a state of greeting guests, for that state is still not Kedusha[holiness], for there are ascents and descents there. Instead, He sent him angels, which is complete Kedusha, for it could no longer be differently, as he has already made the everlasting covenant with the Creator. However, in the similitude of people, meaning that he must discover the situation, that it is only a façade, meaning that he will be able to criticize himself—whether he is aiming for the reward, namely greeting the Shechina, or craving to serve the rav not in order to receive reward.

At that time, if he delights in having been rewarded with guests, although he later discovers that they are angels, but his criticism of himself—that he wanted to see if he was deceiving himself and was thinking of the reward and not of the work—he already received from being happy that he could greet guests again, meaning have room for work. At that time it was clear to him that he was working not in order to receive reward.

It is as Baal HaSulam explained people’s question about the verse, “And He said, ‘Do not reach out your hand to the youth, and do not do anything to him, for now I know that you are God fearing.’” The question is, “Did the Creator not know this before the test?”

He said that the meaning of “for now I know” is that you know that you are God fearing. That is, Abraham wanted to know if he was on the path of only for the Creator and he himself did not merit a name. For this reason, the Creator sent him a test, so that Abraham would know that he can endure the test, for then he would not fear extending upper abundance downward, for now it was clear to him that he will not blemish the upper abundance because he saw that his only wish was to bestow, and nothing for himself, which is called “receiving in order to bestow.”

According to the above, we should interpret what we asked about what our sages said, “Greater is one who enjoys his labor more than fear of heaven.” We asked, “How can this be?”

It is known that there is labor in the Torah and there is the study of Torah. Study of Torah is called that which the Torah teaches us—to keep the commandments of the Creator in act and in intention. It is as we see that there are two blessings: 1) “Blessed are you, O Lord … to engage in words of Torah”; 2) “Blessed are you, O Lord, who teaches Torah to His people, Israel.”

This means that if we thank the Creator for allowing us to engage in words of Torah, it pertains to the labor—that we can engage, which is the engagement in Torah. Also, we thank the Creator for studying Torah, meaning that we have been rewarded with the Creator teaching us. This is called “knowledge of the Torah”—what the Torah teaches us.

We need both labor and knowledge. This is the meaning of what we learn, that there is no light without a Kli [vessel], meaning that there is no filling without a lack. Similarly, a person cannot enjoy rest if he did not previously have toil and labor.

However, here, in the work of the Creator, there are two discernments in the lack: The first is that he craves pleasures. This is the first discernment in the Kli, called “deficiency,” meaning that he feels deficient of this pleasure. The second is that there is a condition to satisfying his deficiency: He must pay for the pleasure. For example, in corporeality, if a person walks into a store and sees something nice that he wants to buy, it follows that now a desire for this something has awakened in him.

The second deficiency is that there is a lack that he wants to receive the object, but he is not given without something in return. Rather, he must pay the owner, and then he is given the object. The fact that he must pay is regarded as labor. This is regarded as a deficiency, since a person thinks that if he were given without pay then he would not be deficient, meaning he would not have the money to pay for the object, which is the reward required of him, and would not be able to give.

It turns out that now he has two deficiencies: 1) He wants that thing. 2) He cannot pay for it.

Thus, the craving for it caused an even greater deficiency because now he knows that he cannot give what is asked in return for the object. It turns out that here, in the work of the Creator, one whose soul yearns to cling to the Creator, a deficiency is born in him. But who causes him that lack of craving for the Creator? This comes from above.

This is called an “awakening from above,” when a person is summoned to enter Kedusha, as it is written, “You will be holy, for I the Lord am holy.” All of a sudden, a person begins to feel that he is far from the Creator, meaning where previously he used tobe preoccupied with other needs, and now he sees that all he needs is spirituality.

Afterward, he begins to think, “What is the real reason that I do not have spirituality?” At that time he comes to a resolution that it is only due to absence of equivalence of form, as in, “as He is merciful, so you are merciful.”

It follows that the first deficiency is that he feels that he is deficient of spirituality. This is the first deficiency. Now he needs to work on equivalence of form but he sees that he cannot, and this is the second deficiency. It is as our sages said, “Man’s inclination overcomes him every day, and if the Creator did not help him, he would not be able to overcome it” (Sukkah 52).

However, this second lack, too, comes from above. That is, the Creator has deliberately made man unable to overcome it (for the reason we already discussed) unless with His help. It follows that that deficiency comes from above, as well. It turns out that the labor is primarily in the second lack, which is regarded as not being able to pay the price required for studying Torah.

That is, there is a high price to being rewarded with the Torah, namely equivalence of form, so there will not be the bread of shame. This is the meaning of what we interpreted concerning the words of our sages, “The Torah exists only in one who puts himself to death over it,” and this is the real labor. It is for this deficiency that the filling comes and fills this lack. This is the greeting of the Shechina, or the secrets of Torah, etc.

Especially, here begins the real division between labor and the reward, meaning that some want to labor without reward, and want to be among the workers who serve the Rav in order not to be rewarded, or who work in order to receive reward, meaning the reward for the labor. That is, they look at what they can gain by the labor, which is called Torah, in the sense that the whole Torah is the names of the Creator. This is called “And you will know that I am the Lord your God.”

It is as our sages said (Berachot 38a), “When I take you out I will do something so you will know that I am the One who brought you out of Egypt” (as said in Article No. 13, Tav-Shin-Mem-Vav). I said there that the intention is that the Creator, besides delivering them from the Klipa [shell/peel] of Egypt, made it so they would be rewarded with knowing the Creator, as in, “The Torah, Israel, and the Creator are one.”

We need to understand the difference between labor in the Torah and knowing the Torah, meaning that he wants only to serve the Rav not in order to be rewarded, without the pay, called “knowledge of the Torah.” Since the Creator’s wish is to reveal the Torah, as it is written, “The Lord desires, for His righteousness He will extol and magnify the Torah,” at that time a person says, “I agree to labor several hours in the Torah so that I may know the Torah. And when there is a desire to reward me for my labor, I agree that the reward will be given to another. That is, I will labor in the Torah, and another will receive the reward, meaning the knowledge of the Torah that should be revealed by the labor that he has given.”

This is true labor because he wants only the labor and not the reward, although the reward is very important to him. Still, he gives it up because he wants to serve the Rav not in order to receive reward. And because the Creator’s wish is that the Torah will be revealed to His creatures, he wants his friend to be rewarded with the knowledge of the Torah, while he wants to continue exerting in the Torah. This is a true exertion because he craves the knowledge of the Torah, as is evident from the fact that only he is making the effort, and not his friend. However, because he wants his work to be for the Creator, he wants to stay in a state of labor.

However, there are people who walk on the path of “Be as servants serving the Rav in order to receive reward.” Because of this, their wish is only the knowledge of the Torah and not the labor. According to what our sages said (Midrash Rabbah, portion, “This Is the Blessing”), “The Creator said to Israel, ‘All the wisdom and all the Torah are easy. Anyone who fears Me and carries out the words of Torah, all the wisdom and all the Torah are in his heart.’”

In order to attain the reward without labor, and since though fear of heaven it is possible to receive the wisdom and the Torah easily, without any effort—as said in the Midrash—they want to be fearing heaven, in order to receive the reward, called “wisdom” and “Torah.” It follows that his fear of heaven is founded on self-love, meaning he is serving the Creator in order to receive reward, called Lo Lishma, but in order to receive reward. This is called “the view of landlords.” It is as Maimonides says, “Until they gain much knowledge and grow wiser, they are taught to engage in Torah and Mitzvot Lo Lishma, but in order to receive reward.”

Now we can interpret what we asked about what our sages said, “He who enjoys his labor is greater than fear of heaven.” We asked, “How can such a thing be?” According to the above, we can interpret that fear of heaven means that he wants to receive the wisdom and the Torah easily and effortlessly. That is, he expects the reward, not the labor. He does not want to serve the Rav not in order to be rewarded. Rather, he wants the reward and not the service, called “labor.” This is called Lo Lishma, which is in order to receive reward.

It is not so with one who enjoys his labor, which is the labor in the Torah, and does not think of the reward, but rather that through the labor he will be rewarded with a Kli, which is a place where the Shechina can clothe because there is equivalence of form between the light and the Kli, and he wants only to bring contentment to his Maker and not to himself, as said above (concerning having guests being greater than greeting the Shechina). Of course, this degree of one who enjoys his labor is greater than fear of heaven. In fear of heaven, his intention is Lo Lishma, but one who enjoys his labor thinks only Lishma, meaning he has no other aim but to bestow.

However, we could ask about the Midrash that says that the Creator said to Israel, “The whole wisdom and the whole Torah are easy: Anyone who fears Me, all the wisdom and all the Torah are in his heart.” According to the above, this is called Lo Lishma, so how can he be granted wisdom and Torah? The Creator says that through the fear they can be rewarded with wisdom and Torah.

We can interpret this the same as when I asked about the question people ask about the verse (Numbers 31:1-3): “And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, ‘Avenge the vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites…’ And Moses spoke to the people, saying, ‘…Go against Midian to execute the Lord’s vengeance on Midian.’”

The question is, why did Moses change what the Creator had told him? The Creator said, “Avenge the vengeance for the sons of Israel,” and Moses said to the people, “the Lord’s vengeance on Midian.”

The thing is that the Creator created the world with the aim of benefiting His creatures, meaning that the creatures will receive delight and pleasure. In order not to have unpleasantness, called “bread of shame,” about the pleasures that the creatures will receive, there was a correction that the receivers will not receive the delight and pleasure from the Creator except on condition that they can receive in order to bestow. This is called Dvekut, equivalence of form.

This is as our sages said (Hagigah 7): “As I for free, so you are for free.” That is, as I want to give you delight and pleasure without any reward, but I rather want you to have contentment, likewise, you are for free, meaning the work you do for Me will be for free, without any reward for your work. This is called equivalence of form.

For this reason, we can interpret that the Creator says to Israel, “It is easy: All the wisdom and all the Torah are in his heart.” However, man should say, “I do not want to the pleasure You want to give me,” which is as it is called, “For this is your life and the length of your days,” and “They are more desirable than gold, yes, than much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and the drippings of the honeycomb.” He gives all of this up although his soul craves these good things. Still, since all those things come into vessels of self-love, and self-love separates him from the Creator due to disparity of form, and he wants equivalence of form, therefore he gives them up.

However, precisely those who want equivalence of form and to be among those who serve the rav not in order to be rewarded, they are the people who have a Kli in which to instill the upper light. There are several names to this: “Instilling of the Shechina,” “greeting the Shechina,” “the secrets of Torah,” or “the light of Torah,” for then the purpose of creation to do good to His creations will come true.

According to the above, we can interpret what our sages said about the verse, “Greater is one who enjoys his labor more than fear of heaven.” It is written about fear of heaven, “Happy is he who fears the Lord,” while concerning one who enjoys his labor, it is written, “If you eat from the labor of your own hands, happy and delighted are you, happy in this world and delighted in the next world.” Concerning fear of heaven, it is not written about it, “and delighted are you.”

We should interpret this world as the time of work, while the next world is called “the time of reward” that he is destined to receive after the work, as it is written, “To do them today and receive the reward for them tomorrow.” Therefore, concerning fear of heaven, the reward is the main thing for him, that he will later be rewarded easily with wisdom and Torah, which is called “the next world.” This is the good he expects to be awarded later. This is why it is written about it once, since it is written about it only “happy are you,” meaning the reward in the next world, this is what he expects. This world is called “the time of labor.” He is not happy in this, and each day he stands and waits, “When will I be rewarded with the reward called ‘wisdom’ and ‘Torah’?”

But one who enjoys his labor is happy during the work, as this is all he wants. He wants to serve the Rav not in order to be rewarded. It follows that he enjoys in this world, called “to do them today,” and he is also rewarded with the next world, called “to receive the reward for them tomorrow.”

Accordingly, we can interpret what we asked about what our sages said, “I have labored and found.” Labor [finding] is without any preparation. It should have said, “I labored and acquired,” meaning that the labor was a preparation for acquiring, but finding is something that comes absentmindedly. According to the above, it may be so since while the labor is the goal because he wants to serve the rav not in order to be rewarded, and as I said above, he agrees that knowledge in the Torah—that will be revealed after his labor—his friend will be rewarded with it, and since the Torah is revealed only after the labor, which is regarded as light and Kli, meaning deficiency and filling. But now that he is giving the Kli and the lack, he agrees that his friend will be rewarded with the filling.

It therefore turns out that during the work he is not thinking about the reward at all. Thus, his labor was not preparation for finding, which is knowing the Torah, for this was not the intention while he was working. Rather, he longed to be among the servants who are serving the rav not in order to be rewarded. Accordingly, the labor was not a preparation for the acquisition. Also, the Torah is called “possession” (Avot, Chapter 6). This is why they said, “I labored and found,” since he was rewarded with knowing the Torah, which came to him absentmindedly, without any preparation for it, hence it is called “finding.”

According to the above, which we said about Abraham, that even after he was rewarded with greeting the Shechina he still longed to have guests because he wanted it to be clear that his intention was not the reward but to serve the rav not in order to receive reward. Now we will understand what Baal HaSulam explained about people’s question about the verse, “And Israel feared,” and then “and they believed,” which would mean that they would not believe before they saw. He explained that it means that even after they were rewarded with seeing, they craved faith.

And as said above, the advantage in work over expectation for reward is evident.

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

ESTE OPRIT SĂ ASCULŢI LUCRURI BUNE DE LA O PERSOANĂ REA

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

It Is Forbidden to Hear a Good Thing from a Bad Person

Article No. 04, Tav-Shin-Mem-Zayin, 1986-87

It is written (Genesis 13:8-9), “And Abram said to Lot, ‘Please let there be no strife between you and me, or between my herdsmen and your herdsmen, for we are brothers. Is not the whole land before you? Please part from me: if to the left, then I will go to the right; and if to the right, then I will go to the left.’”

We should understand why he says “For we are brothers,” since they were not brothers.

The Zohar (Lech Lecha, Item 86) interprets this as follows: “‘For we are brothers,’ meaning the evil inclination and the good inclination are close to one another. One stands to the right of a person and the other to his left. That is, the evil inclination stands to his left, and the good inclination to his right.” Accordingly, “for we are brothers” means that we are speaking of one body and the quarrel is between the good inclination and the evil inclination, which are called brothers.

This is perplexing. The good inclination tells the evil inclination, “If to the left,” meaning you are telling me to take the path of the left, which is the path of the evil inclination, for it is always on the left, as it is written in The Zohar that the evil inclination is to his left. The good inclination tells him: “I will not go by your way. Rather, I will go by the way of the right, the way of the good inclination, which is always on the right. We can understand this. But when it says, “If to the right,” meaning that if the evil inclination goes to the right, which is the path of the good inclination, why does the good inclination tell it, “Then I will go to the left,” meaning that the good inclination will go by the way of the left, which is the path of the evil inclination? This is difficult to understand.

Baal HaSulam asked why is it that when Jacob had an argument with Laban, it is written (Genesis 31:43), “And Laban replied and said to Jacob, ‘The daughters are my daughters, and the children are my children, and the flocks are my flocks, and all that you see is mine.’” That is, Wicked Laban argued that everything is his, meaning that Jacob had no possessions and everything belonged to wicked Laban.

But why is it written (Genesis 33:9), when Jacob gave the presents to Esau, “And Esau said, ‘I have a lot, my brother. Let what is yours be yours.’” He did not want to receive from him everything he wanted to give him. But Laban claims the opposite—that everything is his.

He said that here there is an order of work—how to behave in the work with the evil inclination when it comes to a person with its just arguments in order to obstruct a person from achieving Dvekut[adhesion] with the Creator.

“Laban said” means that it comes with the argument of a righteous. It tells him, when a person wants to pray and wishes to prolong his prayer a little, or another example, when he wants to go study at the seminary, a person had in mind to be as strong as a lion and overcome his laziness. The evil inclination comes and argues, “It is true that you want to overcome, to do the will of your Father in heaven, as it is written (Avot, Chapter 5), “Yehuda Ben Tima says, ‘Be as fierce as a leopard, as light as an eagle, running like a gazelle, and as strong as a lion to do the will of your Father in heaven.’

“However, I know that you have no desire to do the will of your Father in heaven. I know the truth—that you are working only for self-love and you have no love for the Creator that you can say that the fact that you are going to do something now is for the Creator. Rather, you are working only for me, for the Sitra Achra [other side], and not for Kedusha [sanctity/holiness].

“Thus, what is this overcoming? That is, if you are working for me then I advise you to sit calmly and enjoy, since everything you want to do is for me. Therefore, I have pity on you so you will not make great efforts, and enjoy the rest.” This is what Laban said. That is, he dressed in a white Talit [prayer shawl], meaning he said, “The daughters are my daughters … and all that you see is mine.”

Jacob countered him: “It is not so. I am working for the Creator. Therefore it is worthwhile for me to overcome my laziness and do the Creator’s will. I do not want to listen to your argument—the argument of a righteous that you are making.”

Wicked Esau was the opposite. When Jacob came to him and wanted to give him his possession of Torah and Mitzvot [commandments], Esau told him, “I have a lot.” That is, “I have a lot of Torah and Mitzvot from other people, who are all working for me and not for the Creator. But you are righteous; you are not working for me but for the Creator. Therefore, I have no part in your Torah and work. This is why I do not want to receive it and admit it into my authority. Rather, a righteous, and you are working only for the Creator.”

Baal HaSulam asked about it: Which of them made a true argument, Laban or Esau? He said that in truth, both said the truth—what is good for the Sitra Achra, that they obstruct a person from achieving wholeness. The difference is in their arguments: whether it comes before the act or after the act. That is, prior to the act, when a person wants to overcome and do something in Kedusha to benefit the Creator, the evil inclination dresses in the argument of a righteous and tells him: “You cannot do anything for Kedusha. Rather, everything you do is for me.” This is called “All that you see is mine.” That is, you are doing everything for the Sitra Achra. In that case, it is better for you to sit and do nothing. Why exert to overcome your laziness? By this it subdues a person so as not to engage in Torah and Mitzvot. This is Laban’s argument.

Esau’s argument is after the act. That is, if one finally overcomes Laban’s argument and follows the path of Jacob, Esau comes to him and says: “You see what a mighty man of war you are? You are not like your friends. They are lazy and you are a man! There is no one like you!” This puts him into the lust of pride, of which our sages said (Sotah 5b), “Rav Hasda said, ‘Mar Ukva said, ‘Any man in whom there is crassness of spirit, the Creator said, ‘He and I cannot dwell in the world.’’”

For this reason, Jacob counters him and argues, “This is wrong! Everything I did was only for you,” meaning for his own benefit, which is a will to receive that belongs to the Sitra Achra. “Now I must begin the work anew so it will all be for the Creator and not for you. But until now I have been working only for you.” This is what Jacob gave to Esau as a gift and Esau would not receive from him and argued to the contrary, that Jacob was righteous and worked only for the Creator and not for his own benefit.

Now we can interpret what we asked, “How can it be said that the good inclination said to the evil inclination, ‘If you take the right path, I will take to the left.’” After all the path of the left belongs to the Sitra Achra and not to the side of Kedusha. According to the above we can interpret that the good inclination said to the evil inclination: “You should know that you cannot deceive me because I know one thing—that you want to obstruct me from achieving the degree of a servant of the Creator, meaning that all my thoughts will be in order to bestow. And you, due to your role, are trying to leave me in self-love. Therefore, how can I listen to your right, meaning when you come to me and clothe in the argument of a righteous, namely advise me to be righteous and work for the Creator. This cannot be since it is not your role. You probably want to fail my achieving the goal with your counsels. For this reason, when you come with the argument of the right, called Laban, what should I do? Anything but listen to you, and do the complete opposite of your opinion.” This is why it is written, “and if to the right, then I will go to the left.”

Accordingly, a person should always be alert not to fall into the net of the evil inclination that comes to him with the argument of a righteous, and not listen to it. Although it makes us understand that we are not going on the straight path, since what we want to do now is a Mitzva [commandment] that comes through transgression, by these words it ties us and we fall into the trap and the net, as it wants to control us with the justness of its words.

It is said in the name of the Baal Shem Tov that to know whether it is the advice of the evil inclination we must scrutinize: If what it says requires labor, it belongs to the good inclination. But if listening to it will cause you not to need to labor, it is the sign of the evil inclination. By this we can discern if this is the advice of the good inclination or the evil inclination.

For example: If a thought comes to him that not every person should rise before dawn, that this work belongs to people whose Torah is their craft, and not just any Jew can equal wise disciples, who must keep, “And he will contemplate His law day and night,” but just a Jew. It also brings evidence from the words of our sages to justify its argument, from what Rabbi Yohanan said in the name of Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai (Minchot 99): “Even if a person reads only the Shema reading morning and evening, he has kept, ‘This book of Torah shall not move from your lips.’” Thus, it argues before him: “It is better for you to get up in the morning like everyone else and not be tired the rest of the day. Then you will be able to pray with more intention than you will be able to pray if you rise before dawn.”

It is known from all the books of Hassidut that prayer is the most important, since in prayer, a person thinks of nothing but that the Creator will hear his prayer. The prayer is when we can aim more easily and feel before whom we stand. It is not so when studying Torah, although it is written, “Learning Torah is equal to all of them.”

It is also interpreted that the meaning is that the Torah brings one importance and greatness of the Creator. It follows that the Torah is only a remedy that brings a person the ability to pray and feel the words “before whom you stand,” which is a remedy by which to achieve Dvekut [adhesion]. When a person prays to the Creator he can know with whom he speaks and in what manner he is speaking with the Creator. At that time he can annul before the Creator, and this is the most important—that he will annul his own authority. He needs to come to feel that there is nothing in the world but the Creator, and a person wants to adhere to Him and annul his own authority.

Our sages said even more: All the good deeds that a person does, both Torah and other things in Kedusha, a person can see if they are in order according to his feeling during prayer. It follows that prayer is the most important. “If you rise before dawn it will all be ruined. So what are you gaining?” Clearly, it is arguing the argument of a righteous.

At that time a person can scrutinize: If he listens to its argument and it will give him more work then he can know it is the argument of the good inclination. If he listens to its advice and it will give him less work, it is a sign that now the evil inclination speaks to him, but clothed in the argument of a righteous. By this it traps him in the net it has set up for him by speaking to him the words of the righteous. In truth, we always need a guide who knows how to lead a person, so as to tell between truth and falsehood, since one cannot scrutinize alone.

Accordingly, when the evil inclination comes with an argument of a righteous, wanting to advise a person how he can enter Kedusha, we can interpret what our sages said (Baba Batra 98a), “Anyone who boasts with a Talit of a wise disciple, but is not a wise disciple, is not admitted into the presence of the Creator.”

We should understand why it is such a grave sin to boast with the mantle of a wise disciple, meaning to regard the clothing of a wise disciple so highly as to boast of it. After all, he did not commit such a grave transgression worthy of such a harsh punishment as not to be admitted into the presence of the Creator. It implies that we are speaking of a person who is worthy of being in the presence of the Creator, but this sin of boasting with a garment of a wise disciple deserves such a harsh punishment.

We should interpret that it means that the evil inclination comes to a person and boasts of the Talit of a wise disciple, meaning speaks to a person like a wise disciple speaking to an uneducated person and advising him to be a wise disciple. It is as Baal HaSulam asked, “What is a wise disciple? Why do we not say simply, “wise?” It implies we should know that wise means the Creator, whose desire is to bestow upon His creatures. One who learns from the Creator this quality of being a giver is called “wise disciple,” meaning that he has learned from the Creator to be a giver.

Now we can interpret that the evil inclination comes to a person and advises him how to achieve Dvekut with the Creator, meaning to be in the presence of the Creator, but he is not really a wise disciple, namely that the aim of the evil inclination is not to bring him to Dvekut, but on the contrary—to separation—and it is speaking like a wise disciple because it wants to set a trap for him to divert him from the right path.

If a person does not notice who is speaking to him—the good or the evil inclination—and only hears that it is speaking with the Talit of a wise disciple, it takes pride in it, meaning lets him understand the importance of a wise disciple while conspiring to divert him to another path, to disparity of form. At that time one is told that he should know that if he listens to its advice, one who listens to its advice will not be admitted into the presence of the Creator, but to the contrary.

Therefore, one must be very careful and know with whom he speaks. He should not mind what he is saying, meaning that even if it says good things, he must still not listen to it. It follows that from an indecent person it is forbidden to hear even decent words.

Inapoi la pagina 1987 (ŞLAVEY HASULAM (TREPTELE SCĂRII) – link

error: Content is protected !!